Chosen as the closing film for the Busan Film Festival and nominated for seven Golden Horse categories, including best feature, best director and best actor and actress, we’ll find out how Love Education (相愛相親) fares at the award ceremony on Saturday.
Accolades aside, the film is a solid effort by actress-director Sylvia Chang (張艾嘉), who continues her exploration of family relationships, gender roles and, most importantly, facing and reconciling one’s feelings about the past. It’s the first Chang production filmed in China.
Love Education is most often compared to her 2004 effort, 20 30 40, which tells the stories of three women aged 10 years apart. The age difference is bigger here, as we have Chang’s character Huiying, who is retiring, her father’s 90-year-old first wife Nanna (Wu Yanshu, 吳彥姝) and Huiying’s daughter Weiwei (Lang Yueting, 朗月婷), who is about 30 years old. But the plot seems to be more of a carry over from Chang’s previous directorial effort, Murmur of the Hearts (念念).
Photo courtesy of atmovies.com
Set in a nondescript medium-sized Chinese city, Chang wastes no time delving into the dramatic. Huiying’s mother dies in the opening scene, and despite not leaving any clear instructions, Huiying takes it upon herself to move her father’s grave from his home village to the city. However, her father’s first wife, who was left behind in the village a few months after their arranged marriage, refuses to let her take the body, resulting in a comical scuffle that ends with Huiying and her family being chased away by angry villagers brandishing farming tools.
This sets the tone for the rest of the film, which is driven by Huiying’s headstrong, insensitive and controlling personality, which often alienates those around her, including her husband (Tian Zhuangzhuang, 田壯壯) and daughter.
Huiying is not a particularly likable character, but her personality makes the plot work — with Chang playing the role perfectly as she spends much of the film going from government office to office (upsetting more people along the way) trying to obtain legal proof of her parents’ marriage.
The burial dispute is the main impetus, but Chang weaves many subplots into the film to nicely fill out the story, including her impending retirement from her job as a schoolteacher and her fragile relationship with her daughter and husband. We eventually understand why she is so adamant that her parents be buried together, going as far as to threaten Nanna with a lawsuit.
Weiwei becomes involved more than she had expected as the Jerry Springer-style television show she works for wants to feature the dispute between Huiying and Nanna, and eventually even drags her rock singer boyfriend into the mix. Her relationship also becomes one of the subplots.
Some subtle touches are added here and there to heighten the fragility of human bonds and emotions, including encounters with the opposite sex by both Huiying and her husband that may or may not turn into something more, which adds some extra tension. The film could have done without these scenes, but it’s a good thing that they were left in.
All three female leads deliver strong performances, most notably Wu, who successfully portrays the complex layers underneath this taciturn yet passionate woman who suddenly twists people’s ears when she’s mad. The contrast and similarities between the three women’s lives — especially that of Nanna and Weiwei — show that no matter how generations change, human emotions remain the same and they face similar dilemmas though in drastically different contexts.
With many feature films nowadays set amid unrealistically beautiful scenery, it’s probably a conscious choice to feature this one in a drab Chinese city and a pretty standard looking village. Love Education is probably not going to make you cry, but not all dramas have to. In a cinematic world saturated with mushy dialogue only a teenager would believe, this is more of a low-key, mature dose of reality that manages to stay entertaining and relevant at the same time.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless