Oct. 9 to Oct. 15
The windows and furniture went first, then each roof tile, truss, brick and finally the stone floor panels. In November of 1978, the then-195 year old Lin An Tai Old House (林安泰古厝) was gone — but not demolished.
Luckily, the government’s decision to remove the house came during a time when historic preservation was becoming a hot topic. Instead of razing the house, all parts were carefully labeled and numbered so it could one day be put together again.
Photo: Lin Hsiang-mei, Taipei Times
However, since it was the first undertaking of its kind in Taiwan, things did not go as smoothly as anticipated, and the 10km move to its new site took 10 years to complete, with only a third of the original courtyard compound rebuilt.
Perhaps environmental activist and current Taipei Clean Government and Transparency Commission (台北市廉政透明委員會) member Ma Yi-kung (馬以工) was right: after the plan was unveiled on Oct. 11, 1977, she wrote in the book, Goodbye Lin An Tai (再見林安泰), that “there is no way the entire house could be restored to its former glory with such a hasty plan.”
SAVING HISTORY
Photo: Lin Hsiang-mei, Taipei Times
Lee Chia-lin (李家琳) writes in the book, Introduction to Cultural Heritage and its Regulations (文化資產概論與法規) that the the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) completely ignored historic preservation when it first arrived, their main focus was to solidify their rule and focus on economic development.
Rapid industrialization and urbanization in the 1950s and 1960s led to the destruction of countless historic sites, which alarmed many scholars. Since the KMT was only concerned with promoting Chinese culture, Lee writes that preservationists argued that historic buildings were built by people who originally came from China and thus were worthy of attention.
The “movement” to save old buildings took off in the 1970s, with notable events such as the restoration of the Lin Family Garden and the successful resistance to the government’s attempt to raze the Changhua Confucius Temple.
Photo courtesy of Taipei City Government Department of Civil Affairs
Ma was actually elated when she first heard in 1976 that the government was planning to move the Lin An Tai house to the planned Taipei Zoo in order to extend Dunhua South Road (敦化南路) to meet Heping East Road (和平東路).
“We’ve been too used to seeing old houses replaced by modern apartments,” she writes in the book. “At least this shows that society is now paying attention to cultural progress and historical value.”
But when she met with the Taipei City Government to discuss the plans in March 1977, she realized that there was no plan, nor were the officials confident that they could pull off the relocation.
This news garnered the attention of scholars, historians and cultural experts, who all made attempts to stop the government. Of course, there was also a camp who advocated modernization and removal of all things old. The city officials argued that since the house was not listed among Taipei’s official historic sites, it did not have legal protection.
Ma and the other scholars were furious. They later learned that the building was indeed surveyed during the making of the list in 1973, but since it was already in the way of the planned Dunhua South Road extension, the city government intentionally left it out.
After much back and forth over the following few months, the final decision came down for the building to be removed by the end of October 1978.
“It was such a joke,” Ma writes. “The ‘plan’ was a three-page document mostly describing the house and introducing the concept of historic preservation. Only on the second half of the last page were there a mere 138 characters — including punctuation — detailing the relocation.”
BACK TO LIFE
The caretaker of the house, Lin Fu-chuan (林福傳), was forced to accept the relocation plan, Ma writes. The Taipei City Government told Lin that if he did not agree to the terms, they would simply demolish the part of the house that stood in the way of the new road, which would be a far worse outcome.
It took five months to dismantle the house. Due to a land dispute, the parts sat in a warehouse on Anhe Road (安和路) until they were later moved again and placed under a viaduct on Heping West Road (和平西路). Exposed to water leaking through the viaduct, many wooden stresses and columns deteriorated.
Six years later, the government finally found it a new home at Binjiang Park (濱江公園), where it currently sits. By that time, the parts were all mixed up due to the multiple moves and it took a gargantuan effort to reorganize each roof tile and brick.
Many of Taiwan’s early restoration efforts ended up uglifying the structure with additional or non matching modern materials. By 1984, people knew better to keep the building as authentic as possible — the Lin An Tai house’s reconstruction guidelines specifically banned the use of metal, plastic and the use of nails.
Four hundred days and NT$45.3 million later, the building was complete. It opened to the public in June 1987 and continues to be an important tourist site.
“Although the effort to keep it in its original site failed, this was a turning point for the preservation of historic sites in Taiwan,” Lee writes, noting that the incident brought much attention to the issue, leading eventually to the passing of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act in 1982.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless