On March 24, the Council of Grand Justices held a historic debate for a constitutional interpretation regarding petitions submitted by gay rights pioneer Chi Chia-wei (祁家威) and the Taipei City Government on the issue of same-sex marriage. Since Taiwan is the first Asian country to approve a constitutional interpretation on the issue, it attracted attention at home and abroad.
Several legal professionals and government officials, among others, expressed their opinions to the Grand Justices on whether the recognition of marriage should only be between a “man and a woman,” as stipulated in the Civil Code (民法). A ruling is expected within a month.
Chi, who first attempted to file a similar petition in 1986, said that a constitutional interpretation in support of same-sex marriage is likely to hasten the legislation process. Yet even before the debate, there were troubling signs both at the legislature and within the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) that support for same-sex marriage might be dwindling.
Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times
MINISTER UNDER FIRE
During the debate, Minister of Justice Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) raised eyebrows when he stated that marriage equality might ruin the institution of marriage.
“Has there ever been a cultural institution or social phenomenon for same-sex marriage in the thousands of years of our country’s history?” he asked, displaying an astonishing ignorance of the issue.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
Chiu pledged to safeguard the thousands-year-old tradition, while describing same-sex relationships as a “phenomenon newly invented in the 1970s.”
Chiu claimed that legalizing same-sex marriage would destroy a number of traditional cultural and ritual practices, citing “ancestral tablets” for deceased fathers and mothers as an example.
“What are we going to write [for same-sex couples] on the ancestral tablets once same-sex marriage is legalized?” he asked the panel.
Ancestral tablets, of course, are not the issue. But by linking non-legal issues to the amendments to the Civil Code, Chiu exposed his ignorance of the key point: protection of equal rights. In spite of his role as justice minister, he sounded like a spokesman for the Alliance of Taiwan Religious Groups for the Protection of the Family (Family Alliance, 護家盟), an anti-gay organization.
Responding to public criticism, Premier Lin Chuan (林全) said that the minister’s remarks “do not represent the Executive Yuan.”
The justice ministry’s attitude toward lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people was also revealed by a leaked report. According to news outlet Up Media (上報), the ministry issued an internal report that suggested a “special law” (專法) for same-sex couples, instead of amending the Civil Code, so as to avoid potential political risks.
Despite the growing support for marriage equality in recent years, the ministry’s report suggests a same-sex partnership act until “social consensus is reached.”
WORRYING SIGNS
Meanwhile, there are indications that the government may be adjusting its stance. Tsai recently received representatives from 22 religious groups at the Presidential Office. When some representatives expressed opposition to the draft amendments, Tsai reportedly said, “[I’m] a little surprised. I didn’t expect the legislation to be so urgent and cause such an uproar.” Her statement was seen by LGBT people as a compromise with religious forces.
Moreover, soon after the current legislative session began, the Cabinet announced more than 40 draft bills on its priority list. Unfortunately, the marriage equality bill wasn’t one of them.
“Differences between supporters and opponents of the issue have not been resolved,” said Cabinet spokesman Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇).
As the Grand Justices are to issue a constitutional interpretation on the issue within a month, such signs of a policy U-turn are disturbing. Hopefully the Grand Justices can remain neutral and make the decision based on expertise and humanity, so marriage equality will no longer be empty talk.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would