Hemingway described courage as “grace under pressure” and such courage, as well as professional dedication, was needed and shown by all involved in the LAB Space’s second annual 24 hour theater festival held over the weekend.
Starting at 8pm on Friday of last week, eight directors drew by lot a playwright and a group of actors for the play they would direct. After that, each writer also drew a setting, a prop and a line that had to be included in the script, which they would spend the next 12 hours writing.
The script was then given to the director and crew. End result? By 8pm the following night, the audience was treated to eight plays that had been memorized, rehearsed and to be performed. It was an unusual display of ingenuity and creativity, theater at its most raw, most improvisational and most exciting.
Photo courtesy of Jay Jay Chen
All plays had difficulties to overcome given the time constraints. However, the award for most grace under pressure has to go to the team that performed The Evaluation.
James Lo (羅濟豪) wrote this Chinese-language play for 11 characters, but only 3 people showed up — and the director was nowhere to be seen.
Derek Kwan (關顯揚) stepped in to direct and the remaining team of Lin Rou-chun (林柔君), Ho Kang-ting (何岡娗) and Fox Lee (李亞臻) put on a slam-bang performance with Lee and Lin using talking heads and multiple voices in lieu of actual human actors.
Next in the challenge of the draw, Lisa Kang’s House of Days was the most creative and revolved around a black wig. When worn, it allows every member of a family of four living on a remote farm to express their inner dreams and wishes. The play closes with dreamy-eyed actress and step-in director, Miriam Laerke Harkenskov, slyly introducing a new blond wig.
Shashwati Talukdar gets the writer’s “Say what?” award having to work zombies, outer space and the line, “You are not thinking of selling our camel to that madman are you?” into the delightful script of No Space for Brains.
It was great to see many established actors and actresses return, but new faces we expect to see more of are Lucie Liu, the “jilted” wife in Rick Monday’s turnabout comedy Skullduggery and Althea Guiao, the sassy but savvy rocket mechanic in No Space for Brains.
The full program can be found at in English at: thelabtw.com.
The Taiwan of yesteryear was dominated in whole or in part by the Dutch, Spanish, Qing Empire and Japanese. But is the Taiwanese name for a popular edible fish derived from the Portuguese language? Cheng Wei-chung (鄭維中), an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Taiwan History, says yes. The fish in question is the narrow-barred Spanish mackerel, which was listed in early 18th century Qing local gazetteers as Taiwanese specialities alongside milk fish and mullet, according to Cheng’s paper, “Mullet, narrow-barred Spanish mackerel and milkfish: Multiple contextual developments of three certified seafood specilaities in Taiwan, from the
Aug. 10 to Aug. 16 They called him the “No Problem Doctor” (沒關係醫生) because that’s what he always told his patients when they couldn’t pay up. Operating the only clinic in Changhua County’s Pusin Township (埔心) during the 1950s, Hsu Tsai-chih (許再枝) knew that life was difficult in his remote hometown. “They barely had enough to survive, so it was pointless to chase after them for the money,” an 81-year-old Hsu told the United Daily News in 2002. “I just went with the flow, some offered to pay me back years later but I had already forgotten
I didn’t expect to spend more than three minutes out of my car, yet the sun was so brutal I put on my hat before approaching the seawall. Beimen (北門) is the flattest and most sun-baked part of Tainan. It lacks trees and people. In wintertime, the weather is often delightful. It wasn’t yet mid-morning in the hot season, however, and I felt like a leaf shriveling in the desert. Atop the seawall but facing inland, I could see dozens of the rectangular ponds which account for a significant percentage of Beimen’s “land” area. Some, no doubt, were dug to produce
A widely criticized peer-reviewed study that measured the attractiveness of women with endometriosis has been retracted from the medical journal Fertility and Sterility. The study, “Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: a case-control study,” was first published in 2013 and has been defended by the authors and the journal in the intervening years despite heavy criticism from doctors, other researchers and people with endometriosis for its ethical concerns and dubious justifications, with one advocate calling the study “heartbreaking” and “disgusting.” The study’s conclusion was: “Women with rectovaginal endometriosis were judged to be more attractive than those in the two control groups.