For centuries many have pondered what lies behind the Mona Lisa’s enigmatic smile, but it was more of a rhetorical question. Now art lovers can literally discover what the back of Da Vinci’s masterpiece looks like.
In a unique and quirky Dutch exhibition, Brazilian artist Vik Muniz displays about 15 painstakingly recreated exact reproductions of the backs of some of the world’s most famous paintings.
There’s Vincent Van Gogh’s Starry Night leaning facing the wall across the room from Vermeer’s The Girl with a Pearl Earring. A massive, almost bare, wooden frame is the stark reverse side of Rembrandt’s haunting The Anatomy Lesson of Dr Nicolaes Tulp.
Photo: EPA
The paintings looking shockingly exposed, their backs bared, and visitors to the exhibition at the Mauritshuis museum in The Hague could be forgiven for thinking they have accidentally wandered into a storage room.
But a closer look reveals a fascinating trip into the history of each painting, who owned it and where it traveled, as well as changing tastes in art conservation.
On his first museum visit as a schoolboy, Muniz was instantly intrigued not by the artworks, but by the mechanics and artistry of their backs. The Museum of Art of Sao Paulo had displayed the paintings on glass easels and exiting the building the backs were boldly on display for all to see.
As “an eight-year-old I wasn’t very interested in paintings. I was very fascinated that all the paintings from the back, they looked like machines, contraptions. They looked like things that did things,” Muniz told AFP.
“And in fact they do. They serve a purpose. They are instruments for preserving history.”
SEEING A PAINTING ‘NAKED’
His curiosity was later revived in a startling moment when as an adult on a visit to the Guggenheim in New York, he was given a look at the back of Picasso’s Ironing Woman.
“It was like looking at a naked person,” he recalled. An interest was reborn, and when photographing the backs of paintings failed to satisfy his creative spirit, he conceived the idea of actually copying the backs of some of the world’s best-loved masterpieces.
It was not always simple. It took six years of negotiations with the Louvre in Paris to be able to study the back of The Mona Lisa.
The Vik Muniz: Verso exhibition, which opened last week in The Hague until Sept. 4, is now the first full show of these works.
It is extraordinarily intimate, drawing the visitor back through the centuries, forcing them to peer closely at what are more usually neglected parts of an artwork.
“Joconde” is scrawled in a faded black flourish on the back of The Mona Lisa, close to arrows pointing up to show which is the top. A small red triangle painted on the backs of the Dutch masters is a sign that in war time they are part of a priceless cultural heritage which must be saved first.
A bevvy of stickers from the world’s top museums, The Tate Gallery, the Centre Georges Pompidou and the Guggenheim, traces the exhibitions which The Smokers by Fernand Leger painted in 1911 to 1912 has been part of.
MAPPING HISTORY
“The front of the painting tells of the intention of preserving a moment forever,” Muniz said. “The image is supposed to last exactly the way it is for millennia to come.”
“The back of the painting tells the story of changing. It’s where the painting has been.”
The Mauritshuis gave Muniz — renowned for his eclectic art works often in unusual medium such as chocolate, rubbish or sugar — unparalleled access to its most iconic works from the Dutch Golden Age and he and his team have created five new reproductions.
Joining Pearl Earring and The Anatomy Lesson, are Vermeer’s View of Delft and The Goldfinch by Carel Fabritius, as well as Frans Post’s View of Itamarca Island in Brazil.
For future projects, Muniz is already eyeing Gustav Klimt’s The Kiss hanging in Vienna, and Edvard Munch’s The Scream — which in an added challenge has another painting on its back.
For Mauritshuis paintings conservator Abbie Vandivere it was an exciting moment when Pearl Earring came off the wall — something which doesn’t happen often.
“But you can’t tell from the back that there’s this very famous painting on the front,” she laughed.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless