When the Mars rover Curiosity stuck its landing on the red planet on Aug. 6, 2012, it not only opened a new era of space exploration and a bright new door to NASA’s future, but it also signified a triumph of human ingenuity over staggering odds.
There was virtually zero margin of error with the US$2.5 billion project, as this new book about the Rover points out, and many things could have gone wrong with a mission that depended upon the work of more than 7,000 scientists and engineers, and about 500,000 lines of computer code.
After being blasted into space by an Atlas V rocket on Nov. 26, 2011, Curiosity spent eight months hurtling some 354 million miles through space, plunging into Mars’ atmosphere at a brutal 13,200 mph. For the rover to alight safely in the chosen landing zone, everything had to work perfectly in an immensely complicated system known as EDL (entry, descent and landing). The process involved rocket-powered deceleration, a giant parachute and a sky crane using nylon ropes to lower Curiosity gently onto the surface of Mars and set it directly down on its wheels.
It all sounded pretty crazy, as NASA’s top administrator observed, but, as it turned out, it was “the right kind of crazy.” For more than three-and-a-half years now, the little rover has been working diligently, trundling across the surface of Mars, looking for evidence that the planet could have once supported life, and occasionally tweeting.
The Right Kind of Crazy is the title of this engaging book, written by Adam Steltzner, an engineer leading the team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) that was charged with landing the Curiosity. Written with William Patrick, the book is an inside account of the intense decade of teamwork that went into Curiosity, and it’s also the story of Steltzner’s own unlikely journey — from an aspiring musician, who barely graduated from high school, to a California Institute of Technology recruit to a team leader at the JPL in Pasadena, California.
Though The Right Kind of Crazy is hobbled at times by the author’s digressions into management-speak (the reader gets the feeling that he was encouraged to try to extrapolate all-purpose lessons about teamwork and leadership from his experiences), the book offers a gripping account of the Curiosity mission, and some fascinating insights into the engineering principles and analytics involved in pulling off the project. Steltzner — who became known at JPL for his Elvis hair, his cowboy boots and his swaggering style — often talks less like a science geek than like the rocker he wanted to be as a teenager, and he displays a gift here for capturing the high-stakes, adrenaline-laced atmosphere of the Mars Science Laboratory, as the overall project was called.
On top of racing the clock, which had been “set by celestial mechanics” (at one point, the launch date would have to be moved back from 2009 to 2011), Steltzner and his colleagues were faced with inventing a landing system for the car-size one-ton Curiosity, which was filled with delicate scientific equipment and way too heavy for the air-bag cocoons used in earlier rover missions. Along the way, there would be moments in what Steltzner calls the Dark Room — that place where it’s hard to “egghead” your way through a problem, and “you know you have no solution.”
Six months from launch (“a few seconds in spacecraft development time”), something went horribly awry in a simulated landing: Radar, crucial to the process, failed to kick in. After a string of all-nighters, examining “every component for the source of the failure,” Steltzner says, they found “that all our incredibly sophisticated naughty bits had worked fine.” There was nothing wrong with the spacecraft computer or the flight software or the algorithms.
“What hadn’t worked was some run-of-the mill, everyday components” of their test equipment. In this case, the problem was caught in time to save the mission; a similarly mundane mistake that went undiscovered (one team had used English units of measurement; another used metric units) led to the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter in 1999.
In the course of this book, Steltzner gives us an appreciation of the hard data and intuition involved in the engineering of a huge project like the Mars Science Laboratory — and the way teams learned to break down seemingly impossible problems into smaller, more manageable ones. He writes that one of the difficulties with space exploration is that “we never have enough iterations to allow us to fully learn from our mistakes.” And he describes the technology necessary for landing the rover on Mars as “tantamount to magic.”
He reminds us that the kind of life NASA hopes to find on Mars “has nothing to do with little green men or dudes who look like Arnold Schwarzenegger.” Microbes, even fossilized microbes, would be “an astonishing discovery.” Life beyond Earth, he adds, would be “a profound and comforting discovery” — comforting because “it means if we screw up and ruin all life on Earth, we would not have destroyed the only living things in all existence.”
Curiosity hasn’t found any actual life on Mars yet, but it did find an ancient stream bed and evidence that the planet could have supported microbial life billions of years ago. And the rover keeps toiling away, collecting samples, analyzing rocks and sending back spectacular photographs of the red planet, along with the occasional selfie. On the first anniversary of its safe landing on Mars, hundreds of millions of miles from Earth, the lonely little rover sang “Happy Birthday” to itself.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless