The Obama administration’s attempts to cut US carbon emissions by six billion tons by 2030 were boosted on Monday, when 13 of the country’s largest companies added their names to the American Business Act on Climate Pledge.
Among them were Goldman Sachs, Google, Microsoft, Apple, Walmart, Coca-Cola, Cargill and Alcoa. While many of the commitments under the pledge were not new, the White House stated that the news showed the private sector to be “committed to stepping up and doing its part in taking on this global challenge.”
“It’s not simply the administration that’s supporting [these companies] — there’s support in the business community, there’s support in state and local government,” Brian Deese, a senior adviser to Barack Obama, said in a conference call with reporters. “Alcoa is making a commitment to reduce absolute emissions by 50 percent by 2020.”
Photo: Reuters/Tony Gentile
Kevin McKnight, Alcoa’s chief sustainability officer and vice-president of environment, health and safety, said: “To ‘de-carbonize the world’ is one of our core business objectives.”
He went on to correct Deese, however, pointing out: “We are affirming that we’re committed to an absolute reduction goal in the US of 50 percent by 2025, but we appreciate your confidence.”
Among other commitments were a pledge by Coca-Cola to reduce the carbon footprint of “the drink in your hand” by 25 percent by 2020; a pledge by Cargill to reduce greenhouse emissions in its beef supply chain; and a commitment by Google to power its operations with 100 percent renewable energy.
Altogether, according to the White House, the pledge equalled “at least US$140 billion in new low-carbon investment and more than 1,600 megawatts of new renewable energy.” There were also company-specific goals to cut emissions, reduce water intensity and pursue zero net deforestation in supply chains.
This is not the first time that companies have joined the Obama administration in similar efforts. Earlier this year, companies within the White House supply chain including IBM, General Electric and Hewlett-Packard pledged to further reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Most such companies already had sustainability programs in place. For example, Walmart reinforced its previous commitment from 2010 to cut greenhouse emissions by 20m metric tons by the end of this year. But by adding their names to White House efforts, the companies provide support ahead of the United Nations climate change conference in Paris in December.
“We applaud the growing number of countries that have already set ambitious targets for climate action,” the American Business Act on Climate Pledge reads. “In this context, we support the conclusion of a climate change agreement in Paris that takes a strong step forward toward a low-carbon, sustainable future.”
The UN conference is meant to bring together countries, including the US, to agree on a legally binding agreements on greenhouse gas reductions.
Related: EU politicians protest to Congress over climate exemption in TPP row
In the past months, several members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have expressed skepticism over Obama’s ability to negotiate such a deal. This was especially evident after the Republican congressman Paul Ryan added a last-minute amendment to the Trade Promotion Authority bill, also know as fast track, that would bar Obama from making action on climate change a condition of international trade negotiations.
“Tackling climate change is essential for everybody’s prosperity,” MEPs wrote in a letter to Congress, asking it to remove the amendment.
“As the global community prepares for the UN climate conference in Paris this December we do not believe that it is anyone’s interests to be seeking to limit or restrict the scope for international agreements to help us make progress on addressing global warming and climate change.”
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and