The charming and quick-witted author and lawyer Gordon Chang (章家敦) will give a speech — China’s Faltering Economy, Historic Leadership Transition and New Strategic Arc — on Sunday at Taipei’s Ting Ting Tsuei Yu (婷婷翠玉), a restaurant near Da-an District’s Far Eastern Plaza Hotel.
Space for the talk is limited, and it is advisable to contact organizer Jerome Keating, jkeating@ms67.hinet.net, for a seat.
Chang, an outspoken critic of China and regular contributor to Forbes and the World Affairs Journal and the author of The Coming Collapse of China, was particularly vocal throughout the Sunflower movement’s occupation of the legislature and Hong Kong’s democracy protests. He continues to maintain his long-held view that China’s economy is on the brink of collapse, something which he is not afraid to express in lectures around the world and on news channels like CNN, Fox News and the BBC.
Photo courtesy of Gordon Chang
‘SMALL TAIWAN,’ BIG IMPACT
In a Forbes article published earlier this month, Chang discussed how Chinese tourists were visiting Japan to purchase higher quality home products such as toilet seats. They were even clearing the shelves of products that were made in China, trusting that Japanese buyers were more inclined to choose top-of-the-range merchandise, Chang argued.
Japan may be the playground for China’s wealthy, but Taiwan has something more valuable to offer. As Chang tells the Taipei Times, they are visiting Taiwan for less tangible reasons.
“They come for food, scenery and those things they can find only in a free society, like lively commentary on television and books of all varieties,” Chang says.
“The citizens of the world’s largest autocracy love freedom, and they find it everywhere in small Taiwan,” he adds.
Taiwan may lack the “gargantuan architecture” China has, but the vibrancy found on the streets, Chang says, “is what’s missing in the grandiose People’s Republic.”
Taiwan, he says, has been influencing China for decades by way of soft power and culture. Taiwanese elections in particular, have given the Chinese — especially those who are politically aware — some sense that they too, can self-govern.
Chang says that it’s important to draw a distinction between ordinary Chinese citizens and the Communist Party. Although he believes that Taiwanese and Chinese harbor few misconceptions towards each other — something which others may beg to differ especially when seeing Chinese tourists crowd the Taipei 101 or the National Palace Museum — it’s a different story when it comes to China’s government.
AN ELECTION THAT SHOCKED
Beijing was shocked with the results of last year’s nine-in-one elections, Chang says.
“It was inconceivable that Taiwan’s people, whom they wrongly consider to be ‘Chinese,’ could ever vote against economic integration with the People’s Republic,” Chang says.
“It doesn’t matter how many fact-finding missions Beijing’s officials make to Taiwan — they just don’t get it,” he says.
While Taiwan may have the capacity to change the minds of Chinese citizens, it’s unlikely that Taipei will be able to affect any meaningful change in the upper echelons in Beijing.
However, China may have bigger domestic problems to worry about. Chang says China’s economy is headed for a “historic crisis” since debt is accumulating faster than it is growing.
President Xi Jinping (習近平), Chang says, is undoing reforms from previous decades and “recreating Maoist-inspired monopolies by combining already mammoth state enterprises.”
Chang maintains that if China is to avoid an economic crash, it has to grow faster and reform. The problem, he says, is that “further reform would threaten the Communist Party’s hold on power, so it will not sponsor change of that sort.”
Chang adds that “the Chinese economy has gone just about as far as it can within the confines of the Communist Party’s framework.”
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless