On Monday, the Ministry of Education (MOE) celebrated the 10th anniversary of the enactment of the Gender Equity Education Act (性別平等教育法), patting itself on the back for promoting gender education in Taiwan. For the gay and lesbian community, however, there was much to lament.
The MOE caused an outcry in January when Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) recommended Jseng Pin-chieh (曾品傑), a professor at National Chung Cheng University and Ting Hsueh-yin (丁雪茵), an associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education as members of its Gender Equity Education Committee. According to a Storm Media Group (風傳媒) report, the former has made anti-gay remarks in public before, while the latter is a member of an alliance against same-sex marriage.
In response to criticism that these members are linked to homophobic religious groups, Ke Chin-wei (柯今尉), the chief of the MOE’s gender equality education and student counseling section, said that the MOE respects each committee member’s religious beliefs, adding that such appointments reflect diverse social opinion.
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
REFLECTING DIVERSITY
This is simply absurd. Appealing to diversity of opinion to allow discrimination in the schools is a slap in the face for education. Following Ke’s logic, we can expect the MOE to appoint misogynists to protect women’s rights or child abusers to protect children’s rights — all, of course, under the guise of reflecting diversity.
Equally worrying are recent revelations by Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康). Tuan wrote on his Facebook page last month that Taipei Municipal Jieshou Junior High School (介壽國中) had invited a production company to show students a film called Smiling Cross (微笑Cross).
The 2011 film, produced by Passion 99 International Movie Co (熱力九九國際電影有限公司), tells the story of a young male college student who longs for romance, but who has difficulty meeting women. Leaving aside the obvious overtones of the “cross” in the movie’s title, the story itself seems innocuous enough. The question-and-answer session that followed, however, is a textbook example as to why religious groups should be kept out of the public school system.
Tuan says that at the end of the screening, which took place in front of an estimated 700 eighth grade students, the film’s lead actor appeared in front of the assembled children and “confessed” to taking the wrong path, a thinly-disguised reference to being gay. Finding god, he added, set him on the right path — ie, he was cured of his homosexuality. He concluded the session by telling the students to lower their heads and pray.
ANTI-GAY EDUCATION?
The lawmaker says he learned of the incident following parent outrage that the school had signed off on the movie and discussion.
“Why did your school allow religious activists to play an anti-gay movie?” Tuan asked Lin Tsai-jui (林財瑞), the principal of Jieshou Junior High School.
Tuan added that schools should be responsible for teaching the students to respect difference, but was doing the opposite by allowing the dissemination of anti-gay propaganda.
“Imposing a certain standard for one’s sexual orientation is torturous for gay students,” he said. “The school should not try to forcefully change a student’s sexual orientation.”
Lin says that Tuan quoted him out of context.
“The movie was part of the school’s gender equality education, and the actor was just sharing his own experience with the students, not confessing his sexuality,” Lin said.
He added that the movie enables students to see that there are many kinds of options in life.
RELIGION AND THE STATE
This is disingenuous. According to Passion 99’s blog, the movie was played at dozens of schools, from primary and secondary schools to universities. Passion 99 is fully funded by Passion 99 Harvest Church (熱力九九豐收教會), a conservative Christian organization that was an active and vocal participant in a large anti-gay demonstration organized by religious groups in November last year.
It seems clear that the production company is simply a front for disseminating the church’s teachings. Indeed, in addition to the production company, Passion 99 Harvest Church has also established Harvest Character Education Promotion Association (豐收品格教育促進會) to promote the so-called “character education” for teenagers.
Both the production company and educational organization are registered to the same address as Passion 99 Harvest Church. Allowing the former into the state school system raises troubling questions about the separation of religion and the state.
Article 6 of the Education Basic Act (教育基本法) clearly states: “Public schools shall not engage in promotional or other activities for any religion or belief. Nor shall they force administrative personnel, teachers, or students to participate in any religious activity.”
This is an example of where the public schools and the MOE have failed to teach our children about the value of acceptance — be it gender or sexual orientation or any other perceived difference. The authorities in charge must act immediately to ensure that religious groups are not allowed into the public school system to teach hate.
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and