In the closing chapter of Mad as Hell — informatively subtitled The Making of ‘Network’ and the Fateful Vision of the Angriest Man in Movies — Dave Itzkoff lays out how the American media has become even more Chayefskyian in the decades since Paddy Chayefsky, the angry man in question, wrote his crazed, perceptive, unwieldy, galvanizing satiric fantasia set in the world of network television news.
Yet Itzkoff, a culture reporter for the New York Times, doesn’t go far enough. How could he? Between the time the covers were glued on his lively and terrifically detailed account and this very minute, the media world has become more Chayefskyian still.
Rachel Maddow, a real-life, crusading left-wing journalist, now appears as Rachel Maddow in an episode of the snake-pit Netflix drama House of Cards, about a scheming, fictional politician. Giant cable company Comcast plans to acquire giant Time Warner Cable to create an earth-stomping commercial behemoth. Jeff Zucker, president of CNN Worldwide, announces that he wants more reality programming, more of “an attitude and a take,” “more shows and less newscasts” on the Cable News Network.
These times confirm the pinwheeling visions of Howard Beale, the anchorman and “mad prophet of the airwaves” in Network. If, when the movie was first released, the words Chayefsky put into Beale’s mouth were considered outrageous, today they sound eminently sane.
“Right now,” proclaims Peter Finch as Beale, “there is a whole, an entire generation that never knew anything that didn’t come out of this tube. This tube is the gospel, the ultimate revelation; this tube can make or break presidents, popes, prime ministers; this tube is the most awesome goddamn force in the whole godless world, and woe is us if it ever falls into the hands of the wrong people!”
“Right now” was when Chayefsky won the 1976 screenwriting Oscar for his howl against cutthroat network executives and sheeplike viewers, cynical programmers and dumbed-down pop culture, the dual American malaise of infectious personal apathy and metastasizing corporate greed. Not that his howl was universally well received at the time. Itzkoff’s narrative is thorough yet brisk as he catalogs the good and the bad that befell Chayefsky and his passion project. It is fortified with vivid anecdotes pulled from generous access to the Paddy Chayefsky papers at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts and to the Network script supervisor Kay Chapin’s observant production diary. Among the many interviews conducted, those with the screenwriter’s son, Dan Chayefsky; his longtime producer, Howard Gottfried; and the Network cinematographer, Owen Roizman, are particularly illuminating.
The movie stung industry insiders. “Awful,” “just such a caricature,” “simply couldn’t happen,” said Richard S. Salant, then president of CBS News. It also divided critics. “Brilliantly, cruelly funny,” Vincent Canby said in the New York Times; “a mess of a movie,” said Frank Rich, then a movie critic at the New York Post.
Still, it was nominated for 10 Academy Awards, and won four, including Chayefsky’s for screenwriting. Faye Dunaway won best actress for her performance, both chilling and sizzling, as a ruthless programming executive; Beatrice Straight won best supporting actress for her small but piercing role as an executive’s wronged wife; and the best actor award went, posthumously, to Finch, who died of a heart attack in January 1977. (The director, Sidney Lumet, lost to John G. Avildsen, who directed Rocky.)
But what of it? “Los Angeles did not really suit his temperament,” Itzkoff says of Chayefsky; “neither did awards ceremonies, nor did fawning attention.”
Some of that prickliness was in self-respecting service to his talent, which Chayefsky was justly proud of; he had rare and absolute creative control over his scripts, and brooked no changes in his famously wordy monologues. (Finch could make it through the mad-as-hell speech in its entirety only once, and Lumet shot only two takes; the final version uses a portion of each.) Some of that was blunt cantankerousness, and, as Itzkoff puts it, Chayefsky’s “familiar, cynical form.” Some of it was no doubt a carapace to protect an artist’s thin skin. He died of cancer in 1981, at the age of 58.
Mad as Hell is most engrossing when the focus is on how the work actually got done: how the screenwriter wrote and cut and rewrote; how the director shot and planned the next shot; how the casting was completed; and how the producer, director and screenwriter accommodated their fancy constellation of stars. (An account of the negotiations necessary to produce Dunaway’s great sex scene with William Holden is irresistible.) And if the emphasis on Chayefsky’s Chayefskyness occasionally wears thin — yes, yes, we get it, he’s mad as hell! — there is more than enough prescient wisdom tossed off in his notes and drafts and dialogue to absorb the reader.
“The thing about television right now is that it is an indestructible and terrifying giant that is stronger than the government,” Chayefsky jotted down. “It is possible through television to take a small matter and blow it up to monumental proportions.” That was just a note in an early draft. Preach it!
The year was 1991. A Toyota Land Cruiser set out on a 67km journey up the Junda Forest Road (郡大林道) toward an old loggers’ camp, at which point the hikers inside would get out and begin their ascent of Jade Mountain (玉山). Little did they know, they would be the last group of hikers to ever enjoy this shortcut into the mountains. An approaching typhoon soon wiped out the road behind them, trapping the vehicle on the mountain and forever changing the approach to Jade Mountain. THE CONTEMPORARY ROUTE Nowadays, the approach to Jade Mountain from the north side takes an
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and