Japan will review the testimony of South Korean women who served in wartime brothels, a senior official said on Friday, but he gave no indication whether Tokyo might water down a 1993 apology on the issue that has long caused friction with its neighbors.
The possibility of a revision to the landmark apology, known as the Kono Statement, drew outrage from South Korea and China, from where many of the “comfort women” — as the women who served in the brothels are known in Japan — were recruited.
The move comes as remarks on the wartime past by aides to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe raise concerns about his increasingly conservative agenda, aimed at bolstering the military and recasting history with a less apologetic tone.
Photo: AFP
Japan’s ties with South Korea are frayed by a territorial row and the legacy of its 1910-1945 colonization of the Korean peninsula, including the question of compensation and an apology to women forced to serve in military brothels in World War II.
In 1993, then Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono issued a statement recognizing the involvement of military authorities in the brothel system and apologizing for the women’s suffering.
The statement was based in part on the testimony of 16 South Korean women who had served in the brothels.
Current Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga repeated on Friday that the government would re-examine the women’s testimony. But he sidestepped a direct reply when asked whether this might lead to a revision of the Kono statement.
“We will review their testimony,” Suga told a news conference after being asked repeatedly about the issue.
He initially promised a re-examination of the women’s testimony on Thursday in comments to a parliamentary committee.
CHINESE, SOUTH KOREAN DENUNCIATIONS
The Chinese Foreign Ministry denounced the recruitment of comfort women as “a serious crime against humanity.”
“Any attempt by Japan to deny this crime and any move attempting to overturn the case of the history of invasion would be met with strong opposition from both the majority of the victims from countries and the international community,” spokeswoman Hua Chunying Hua told a news briefing in Beijing.
South Korea’s Foreign Ministry said Seoul could accept no attempt by Japan to raise questions “about whether there was coercion in the recruitment, transport and management of comfort women that it itself had recognized through the Kono statement”.
At least one political group, the nationalist Japan Restoration Party, which Abe’s government looks to for support on selected issues, called this week for revision of the 1993 declaration. It criticized Japanese foreign policy for aiming principally not to “rock the boat” in Asia.
“... We are starting a citizens’ movement and petition drive calling on the government to revise the Kono statement which is concerned with the ‘comfort women problem,’” it said.
Abe came under fire abroad during his first tenure from 2006-2007 for denying government involvement in forcing women to work in the military brothels during World War Two.
In a cabinet statement issued then, his government said there was no proof that either the military or government officials had kidnapped women, but also said it was continuing the position expressed by previous governments.
Abe said in parliament on Thursday that Japan had caused great pain in Asia and elsewhere in the past. His government would stick by past apologies and the door was open for dialogue with Beijing and Seoul, he added.
Last December, Abe visited Tokyo’s Yasukuni Shrine, where convicted war criminals are honored along with war dead, further straining relations with China and South Korea.
The visit also prompted a rare statement of “disappointment” from the United States.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless