The Riverbed Theater’s (河床劇團) A Secret for a Secret (只有秘密可以交換秘密) at the Experimental Theater on Friday night was a fine introduction to the work of Taiwanese poet Hsia Yu (夏宇), capturing the lyricism of her wordplay by actors singing the verses, rather than speaking them.
As the audience took their seats, three people were already on stage: a woman sitting on a chair in the back, a woman sitting on a low, square box on the floor, and a man perched atop one of the 12 large wooden boxes that formed a semi-circular wall. The actual play began with the woman on the box blotting her face as she gazed into a mirror, but instead of cleaning her face she was adding black streaks, while in the back, a man with a large face mask entered, wearing rubber gloves with the hands bloodied. Were they linked? It is never easy to tell with Riverbed, you just have to let the images sink into your brain. Actors emerged from below the floor or disappeared into the mattress of the tilted bed, they entered and exited slowly, occasionally wearing rabbit masks or dressed in a giant panda costume.
With Riverbed productions, the set is often as engaging as the human actors. It may have appeared rather simple, but there were layers upon layers: the large walls in the back slid apart to reveal a red-velvet-curtain draped stage; a tilted bed came rolling out of a box, lifting the lid on the flat square box on the floor revealed a small grass lawn, which in turn had a square opening to allow a puppet (a Muppet dressed as a cheerleader) to emerge.
Photo Courtesy of Riverbed Theater
Hsia was at Friday night’s show and pronounced herself well pleased with what director Craig Quintero and his team had created from 10 of her works, which included Written for Others (寫給別人), Hug (擁抱), Dancing Without You (背著你跳舞) and Ventriloquy (腹語術).
My one complaint about the show was that at just over an hour it was too short. I did not want to leave the world created by Hsia and Quintero. However, the disappointment was tempered by the knowledge that Riverbed is today starting to set up another production/exhibition that will be part of the Are We Working Too Much? (我們是否工作過量?) show at the Eslite Gallery (誠品畫廊) on the fifth floor of the Xinyi store, which opens on Saturday for a five-week run before transferring to Greater Taichung.
On Saturday afternoon at Taipei’s Huashan 1914 Creative Park (華山1914文創園區), Le Ballet du Siecle de Taipei (世紀舞匯) gave a very pared down staging of the divertissements from Act II of the The Nutcracker with just nine dancers — seven women and two men.
With so few dancers, almost everyone danced more than one role, with the Nutcracker/prince doubling as a partner for the Spanish dance, Clara dancing the Dance of the Reed Pipes — which is usually a pas de trois — as a solo, and the two girls who dance the Chinese dance taking key roles in the Waltz of the Flowers. Clara and the Sugar Plum Fairy did very well, given the limited space they had to dance in, but they will have to remain unknown except to family and friends since the program did not provide any names.
What the show lacked in scale, the dancers made up for in enthusiasm — and the proof was in the little girls who crept out of their seats and/or their mothers’ arms as the show progressed so they could sit on the floor and get as close to the dancers as possible. The true magic of The Nutcracker is best seen through the eyes of the very young.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless