No, this is not a manual — by which I mean that it’s not a book that’s meant to be read with one hand. Despite its pink wrapper and the cover photograph of a naked young man with a flap-happy wrist, it’s a solemn pedagogical production, derived from an undergraduate course taught by Halperin, who is WH Auden distinguished university professor of the theory and history of sexuality at an address somewhere in the American cornbelt. Out there on the dreary plains, Halperin instructs students who could be his grandsons in irony, archness, melodramatic flouncing, the worship of Judy Garland and all the other queeny foibles and fetishes that most of us thought had been discarded when gay men marched out of the closet and asserted their right to respect and acceptance. Bobs, bangs and military buzzcuts probably feature in the curriculum: Halperin has an earnest interpretative interest in “what a hairstyle is ‘about.’”
The course, when first offered, created a local scandal, because a state university was expending public money on what Halperin enticingly called “an experiment in the very process of initiation.” Affronted legislators wondered what kind of homework was required of the inductees. I’m curious myself, since Halperin on one occasion addresses the reader of this book as “darling.” He relished the outrage of the puritans: he was used to it, having been accused of sexual harassment while teaching at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the early 1990s. That charge was dropped, and MIT sent him off on study leave for a couple of years; his next academic appointment, however, was in faraway Australia, where he can’t have made many friends if he imperialistically announced, as he does in his book, that “being gay is like being American” and presented himself as the proselytizing agent of “total, global queerness.” Now repatriated to the US, he is assiduously milking the fuss about his course, which has enabled him, as he reports with a hoot of triumph, to increase his lecture fee.
Halperin’s first efforts to profess “gay male studies” were half-cocked. He made the mistake of expecting his mid-western students to read books, which bored them; they spent his classes covering the attendance sheet he circulated with doodles of themselves in drag, preening under the hair-dryer in a beauty salon. Revamping the course as “How to Be Gay,” Halperin eased the strain on their bubbly brains by dispensing with a bibliography and instead prescribing excerpts from a few campy movies. His book devotes literally hundreds of pages to the obsessive analysis of a catfight between Joan Crawford and her bitchy daughter in the film noir Mildred Pierce, with footnotes on Faye Dunaway’s maenadic impersonation of Crawford on the rampage with a coat-hanger in Mommie Dearest and Sofia Coppola — the distinguished professor, incidentally, misspells her name — lewdly mimicking both Crawford and Dunaway in a music video for Sonic Youth.
The abusive encounter between Crawford and Ann Blyth in Mildred Pierce is, for Halperin, a Freudian primal scene, an authoritative primer from which gay men can learn how to be ersatz women, suffering with grandiloquent flair while rolling their eyes and spitting epigrammatic put-downs at each other. I’m glad that he mostly stays away from literature (which, as he found, gave his students headaches), since he describes Melville’s Christ-like Billy Budd as the apotheosis of rough trade, a pick-up whose naval pants obligingly unbutton in the rear, and his only reference to Auden, in whose honor the professorship he holds was endowed, refers to the old boy’s quaint habit of referring to himself not as “I” but as “Your mother.” Halperin is more at ease when enthusing over curiosities like To the Last Man, a porno western in which cowboys wearing very snug jeans gun down their bunkmates and are ineffectually reproved by a preacher who lisps “I’m tired of getting blood on my dog collar.”
If you can tune out Halperin’s shrillness and grope though his pseudo-philosophical miasma (“Every thing is a ‘thing’,” he tells us at one point), you may be able to trace an argument I happen to consider reactionary and disreputable. By teaching the young to adore old-time divas like Crawford and Garland, Halperin hopes to persuade them that gayness is about culture not sex, about solitary, subjective taste not shared identity. In his nostalgia for the heyday of giddy effeminacy, he denounces the campaign for marriage rights as a concession to “heteronormative” society; political protests about discrimination are waved away by his silly insistence that “camp is a form of resistance to power” or his astonishing notion that maleness is a mode of “terroristic surveillance and enforcement,” a symptom of the “lethal dose of unironised masculine histrionics that the world has had to absorb since September 11, 2001.” This swishing makes me wonder whether al-Qaida’s fanatics may have a point about the decadence of the west.
Back in the 1960s, Susan Sontag — whose Notes on Camp articulated in a few fleet aphorisms most of what Halperin spends more than 500 pages paraphrasing — welcomed a new gay formalist style in criticism by declaring: “In place of a hermeneutics we need an erotics of art.”
In the mainstream view, the Philippines should be worried that a conflict over Taiwan between the superpowers will drag in Manila. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr observed in an interview in The Wall Street Journal last year, “I learned an African saying: When elephants fight, the only one that loses is the grass. We are the grass in this situation. We don’t want to get trampled.” Such sentiments are widespread. Few seem to have imagined the opposite: that a gray zone incursion of People’s Republic of China (PRC) ships into the Philippines’ waters could trigger a conflict that drags in Taiwan. Fewer
March 18 to March 24 Yasushi Noro knew that it was not the right time to scale Hehuan Mountain (合歡). It was March 1913 and the weather was still bitingly cold at high altitudes. But he knew he couldn’t afford to wait, either. Launched in 1910, the Japanese colonial government’s “five year plan to govern the savages” was going well. After numerous bloody battles, they had subdued almost all of the indigenous peoples in northeastern Taiwan, save for the Truku who held strong to their territory around the Liwu River (立霧溪) and Mugua River (木瓜溪) basins in today’s Hualien County (花蓮). The Japanese
Pei-Ru Ko (柯沛如) says her Taipei upbringing was a little different from her peers. “We lived near the National Palace Museum [north of Taipei] and our neighbors had rice paddies. They were growing food right next to us. There was a mountain and a river so people would say, ‘you live in the mountains,’ and my friends wouldn’t want to come and visit.” While her school friends remained a bus ride away, Ko’s semi-rural upbringing schooled her in other things, including where food comes from. “Most people living in Taipei wouldn’t have a neighbor that was growing food,” she says. “So
Whether you’re interested in the history of ceramics, the production process itself, creating your own pottery, shopping for ceramic vessels, or simply admiring beautiful handmade items, the Zhunan Snake Kiln (竹南蛇窯) in Jhunan Township (竹南), Miaoli County, is definitely worth a visit. For centuries, kiln products were an integral part of daily life in Taiwan: bricks for walls, tiles for roofs, pottery for the kitchen, jugs for fermenting alcoholic drinks, as well as decorative elements on temples, all came from kilns, and Miaoli was a major hub for the production of these items. The Zhunan Snake Kiln has a large area dedicated