Art lovers should expect the unexpected in the latest offering of the ground-breaking and normally roof-scraping Monumenta exhibit, as artist Daniel Buren brings the Grand Palais’ lofty ceiling for the first time — literally — down to earth.
Monumenta, the hugely mediatized annual art project that’s in its fifth year dares an artist of international stature to “move into’’ the nave of one of the French capital’s most monumental buildings, and own it.
With a space measuring 13,500m2 and 45m high, it’s a dizzying feat for any artist, but especially for Buren.
Photo: AFP
The man, a national treasure in France, is a minimalist artist.
In a testament to the show’s importance, French President-elect Francois Hollande dropped in Wednesday last week — a day before the opening to the public — for his first cultural event since winning Sunday’s election.
Last year’s leviathan-shaped gargantua by British artist Anish Kapoor is a hard act to follow, scraping the nave’s ceiling, and attracting more than 270,000 people in six and a half weeks.
But as ever, Buren, who won 2007’s Praemium Imperiale award, akin to the Nobel Prize for art, thinks outside the box.
Thinking big
Buren’s attempt sees myriad translucent circles in red, blue, green and yellow installed horizontally like a second human-scale roof, 2.5m high, supported by his signature 8cm bars, striped in black and white.
The central part directly underneath the nave is empty, save for nine circular mirrors on the floor, shining up.
At first look, it seems as if Buren has failed his Monumenta homework — to fill the space.
But think again: what’s the medium that fills not only the Grand Palais, but every interior ever seen? In a word: light.
“The spirit of this place is sun, is light, which cuts through the color in the circles ... You need to feel for the space you’re in ... The Grand Palais with the glass ceiling has such beautiful light, all the time — even on a rainy day,’’ Buren said.
Visitors were seen exploring furtively under the rainbow-dappled disks that stand uniformly at 2.5m high across the expanse, some in awe and others in confusion.
There was a gasp as the morning’s first ray of sunlight shone through the building’s roof.
“Wow. That’s the moment I only understood it, when the sunlight came through the ceiling and hit the disks and shone of the floor: that’s the beautiful part with colors everywhere, when everything came together perfectly,’’ said Nina Aelbers, 27.
Others could only describe their reaction to the work in metaphor: one viewer at a loss for words, Roberta Prevost, called the second roof a “shimmering rug or multicolored tapestry.’’
Art critic Joost de Geest summed it up best: “Buren’s art is never immediately accessible, visible. You need to stroll around to feel it. The colored circles are very light, joyous, agreeable, but you need to discover them first. Imagine this — you can walk comfortably around the Grand Palais for the first time! I like that it’s on a small scale.’’
The small size was intentional.
“I’ve often worked in very different projects, different sizes. Some are empty, some are full, some are deconstructed. Here, again, the fundamental heart of the work was to make the work accessible and personal ... I made the ceiling this low, so it would be just about the height of a person, human size. It’s to re-appropriate the building for everyone,’’ Buren said.
As part of plan to democratize the space, Buren also sealed up the main entrance of the Palais, and in the process visually censored its huge doors and sweeping stairs.
“Oh yes, that’s the first thing I did, when I started thinking how to make this space more personal. I blocked off that entrance that doesn’t work, and it doesn’t need and opened up the smaller side doors at the north and south ... I want the volume of air in the Grand Palais to speak by itself. That’s exactly the idea.’’
Detractors
Not everyone, however, was convinced by the installation’s size, and perceived lack of grandeur, such as Jonathan Hoenig, who’d seen last year’s Kapoor exhibit: “When I first saw it was underwhelming. It’s Monumenta — and of course I expected something bigger, more impressive from someone like Buren. Last year, Kapoor really filled the space, he was better.’’
It’s not the first time criticism has been fielded at Buren, who has previous examples in his 40-year career of sparsely endowing vast expanses.
His most famous permanent work in situ at Paris’ Palais-Royal, triggered a national outcry in the 1980s during the two years of its creation.
Filling the entire courtyard of the famous 17th century palace, a stone’s throw from the Louvre museum, Buren installed dozens of short black and white columns (again, with his signature stripes), with some standing no taller than stumps.
Critics said Buren had defaced national heritage.
In the ensuing outrage, the fencing around the construction site was covered in graffiti and there were even threats to destroy Buren’s work.
It caused a halt to the project, which was eventually completed in1986.
Twenty five years on, and the columns have since gone on to become a sort of national treasure, the marble stumps now affectionately called The Buren Columns.
Buren reflected on any hiccups in the making of his 2012 work.
“Ah no, we were lucky there were no problems in the making of this installation, so we ran on time!’’ he admitted, jovially.
Humor is a tool well-suited to weather many a storm in the fickle world of art, as Buren demonstrates well.
When asked for the artistic reasoning behind his narrow choice of colors, journalists chuckled: the company that manufactured them “only had four.”
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and