Just before a recent advance screening of The Cabin in the Woods, a friendly publicist asked the assembled bloggers and critics if we would please refrain from disclosing any of the “reveals, surprises and uncredited performances” in the movie we were about to see. I’m happy to oblige, though I worry that it might count as a spoiler even to mention that there are reveals, surprises and uncredited performances.
The filmmakers — Drew Goddard directed and collaborated on the script with the estimable Joss Whedon, one of the producers — clearly went to a lot of trouble to put all that stuff in. With compulsive effort that is meant to feel like giddy abandon, they have tried to make a horror movie that is frightening, original and knowing, all at the same time. Two out of three is not bad, given the difficulty of the task. A wink can sometimes undermine a scare. Novelty and genre traditionalism often fight to a draw. Too much overt cleverness has a way of spoiling dumb, reliable thrills. And despite the evident ingenuity and strenuous labor that went into it, The Cabin in the Woods does not quite work.
Which is not to say that it entirely fails, either. Right at the beginning two parallel conceits are set in motion. Five attractive young people, full of pheromones and naive exuberance, set off for a party weekend in a remote — well, take a guess.
Photo courtesy of CatchPlay
Meanwhile, a pair of white-shirted white guys (Richard Jenkins and Bradley Whitford) busy themselves at what looks like NASA ground control or Norad headquarters or some other supersecret, ultradangerous, highly secure official facility. Though it does not take long to discern a connection between what they and their colleagues are doing and what those kids in the woods are up to, I will retreat into generality and indirection for the rest of this review. I don’t want that publicist to come after me with a chain saw.
Some of the pleasure of the first (and best) part of The Cabin in the Woods comes from trying to see just over the narrative horizon and figure out what these incompatible sets of cliches have to do with each other. Two distinct kinds of movie are being yoked, by violence, together, and the performers inhabit their familiar roles with unusual wit.
Since this is — at least officially and at least half the time — a slasher/zombie/monster kind of movie, the revelers are arranged according to well-known types. Or they seem to be: the discrepancies between those assigned identities and other, less predictable aspects of their personalities turn out to be part of an elaborate meta-meta-joke. The designated dumb jock (Chris Hemsworth) and the designated dumb blonde (Anna Hutchison) may not actually be all that dumb. The cynical, paranoid stoner (Fran Kranz) might turn out to be more sensible than most of his friends. Even the bland, nice, would-be couple (Kristen Connolly and Jesse Williams, both charming) whose survival you are primed to root for, are kind of, well, interesting. Now let’s sit back and watch them die!
Photo courtesy of CatchPlay
Once the doomed five reach their destination (after an ominous stop at a deserted gas station), terrible things begin to happen pretty much on schedule, and the two plots begin to converge. Whitford and Jenkins provide clues and tongue-in-cheek commentary about the ordeal at the cabin in the woods, which they are observing along with a nervous
co-worker (Amy Acker) and a skeptical security guard (Brian White).
Their callous amusement at the unfolding spectacle of violence and terror is mildly shocking, but of course it is also a reflection of the audience’s experience. We go to scary movies because we enjoy being manipulated into being scared by phenomena we know better than to believe in, and The Cabin in the Woods takes special delight in the mechanics of its own artifice.
Dismissing the recent vogue for technically crude, fake-real shockers in the Paranormal Activity manner — and sidestepping the gory sadism of the torture subgenre of the Saw and Hostel pictures — this movie evokes the playful pseudosophistication of the Scream franchise.
The lesson of the Scream movies — a lesson their characters reliably failed to learn — was that a grasp of the semiotics of cinematic horror will not necessarily save you from a crazed killer. At its best, that series proved that it was possible to be spoofy and scary at the same time, to activate the cognitive and sensory circuits that produce both laughter and fear.
The Cabin in the Woods bungles that relatively straightforward trick, partly because it wants to do a lot more than provide a dose of shrieks and giggles. There is a scholarly, nerdy, completist sensibility at work here that is impressive until it becomes exhausting. Not content to toss off just any horror movie, Goddard and Whedon have taken it upon themselves to make every horror movie. I, and they, mean this literally, but to say more would be to reveal too much and spoil the fun. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what the movie does in the end.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist