A man doffs his head. For half a second it looks like a gesture of welcome, the body leaning forward as if about to bow. One could almost take the head for a hat. But the eyes are tight shut, wincing, enduring, concentrating hard on whatever is happening within while out of his mouth issues a string of tiny wire figures, miniature men exactly like him except that they are somehow keeping their heads.
Stand close to this marvelous figure by the Spanish artist Juan Munoz, currently on show at the Frith Street Gallery, London, and you become part of a peculiar identity crisis. Who or what is he? Slightly smaller than life, and matte gray from his empty collar to the scuffed toes of his shoes, he cannot be anything but inanimate. He even seems to be made out of something like laminated mackintosh.
And that string of figures on their twisted wire, standing in for garbled words; that uniform gray; that idea of losing one’s head, getting out of one’s mind — he is in himself a figure of speech. But this man stands in our world, in our space, stirring feelings of empathy and unease that don’t quite go with being merely artificial. He could almost be one of us, or a member of some counterpart race. He inspires true fellow feeling.
photo: BLOOMBERG
The gray men outlive their maker, who died very suddenly in 2001 at the age of 48. Munoz had Tate Modern’s Unilever commission at that time and had transformed the Turbine Hall as no other artist before him or since. The infrastructure he created between two floors, with its secret service of gray suits performing their enigmatic drama in a network of balconies, lift-shafts and corridors, was bewildering, mysterious, enthralling — somewhere between a parallel city and the embodiment of purgatory.
The figures at the Frith Street Gallery are like odd men out, the ones that got away. Most of their colleagues were made to be seen high up on those balconies and walkways. These men are down on the ground, intimate with the viewer. You could, I suppose, reach out and touch them if that didn’t feel like an intrusion. That is part of their semi-human power: like actors they partake of the real as well as the illusory.
One man tries to forge ahead, bowed down against the wind and the rain and the burdens of life. Another seems to be carrying his own shroud like an attribute. A third bears a burning fluorescent tube, eyes closed against its blinding light, perhaps listening to its faint crackle. He is caught between the outward danger and the inner struggle, trying to come to terms with one, the other, perhaps both. His face is alarmingly ambiguous.
But the light allows you to see, more closely than before, one source of the power that characterizes these figures. From a certain angle the expression may appear to be blind stoicism or pain; from another there is the dawning of something more like enlightenment. And in between there are many other nuances.
So that sets them apart from most statues (although curiously closer to those living statues on our city streets, fleetingly letting their guard down beneath the greasepaint) just as their racial connection sets them apart from most sculpture. For no matter how isolated in the gallery, or how solitary their cares, they are all part of the same cast of quasi-human characters, and we seem to be more than just their audience. It is as if we coexist with them.
The gray men (and the color is crucial, for they must be both naturalistic and unreal) are among Munoz’s great coinings. Seeing them up close in this show you notice more keenly that although they bristle with self-consciousness, they are not putting out. They never attempt to make eye contact with the viewer — unlike the people in Munoz’s drawings.
In these dark and knotted images, shadowy figures turn stealthily towards the viewer. Some are misshapen, others like gargoyles or confidence tricksters, catching your eye with a conspiratorial wink. The effect can be vividly confrontational, as if one had peered into a gloomy window and found someone staring right back.
These effects are deepened, somewhat, by Munoz’s use of black oilstick on white paper. But they also emphasize a family resemblance between the drawings and the three-dimensional works. Namely, that although his art veers in the direction of theatre, of speech, dialogue and the dramatic encounter, it aims for something that cannot be said.
A wonderful curtain-opener of a drawing could also be this show’s final act. It depicts a dark figure holding up some heavy drapes, alone on the page like a Goya vignette. He seems to be looking for an audience, or perhaps avoiding one backstage. Either way, it could all vanish to black or white in an instant, the image expunged when that curtain drops.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless