In our age of many so-called “revolutions,” it is good to be reminded what a real revolution tastes like: not simply the removal of a ruler but the complete overthrow of the social, economic and political structures. Robert Service’s new book revels in the sheer exuberance of the first months of Russia’s 1917 upheavals, with the new leaders “cheerfully smashing institutions to smithereens.” As he makes clear, these Bolsheviks were committed to the overwhelming use of force and terror in achieving their revolutionary ends. In this context, the idea of “democratic revolutions” such as those in Egypt or Tunisia seems like a contradiction in terms.
As befits the serial biographer of Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin, Service is well primed to draw sharp portraits of the leading actors. The picture of a grumpy Lenin writing his April Theses on the infamous sealed train, which the Germans permitted to cross their territory, will long live in the mind. Humorless to a fault, Lenin not only banned smoking on the train but also introduced a ticketing system for the overused toilets. If only the Russian proletariat had known what it was in for.
In those early years, both the Bolsheviks and the Western powers were desperately trying to understand what had happened in Petrograd in 1917 and what it meant for the rest of the world. Lenin and Trotsky seized power convinced that they were merely the vanguard and, even if they were crushed, Russia’s revolution would have provided the spark for Europe to follow. By the early 1920s, they saw that Marx had got that bit of futurology wrong. After the first chaotic flush, they began the dual strategy of seducing the captains of Western industry while attempting to undermine them.
There is a lovely moment when a serious diplomatic mission arrived in Berlin for peace talks with the German government, only for a crate they brought in their diplomatic luggage to break open on the railway platform, spilling out “insurrectionary propaganda.” While it was dispiriting to watch as uprisings in Berlin and Budapest and Munich guttered into nothing, the failures also gave the new leaders the sense that they had the right to control and patronize their brothers and sisters elsewhere. Though even Lenin had to admit, when the Red Army was defeated in Poland, that the workers had joined “a Polish patriotic upsurge” rather than the international revolution.
Lenin was faced with giving up at least temporarily his belief in state control, and reintroduced a market economy in order to survive. When famine struck, the Bolsheviks had to accept food aid from the US. These are the years when the party learned that ideology did not govern — and when the shape of the future centralized, paranoid Soviet regime was forged.
On the Western side, there was a heady mix of ignorance, uncertainty and fear. At first, attempts were made to keep the Russians in the war against the Germans; later the fear of contagion drove Western leaders to all sorts of absurdities, and half-baked intervention. Those who want to understand the seemingly genetic antipathy the Soviet secret services (ex-employee: prime minister and soon to be president again, Vladimir Putin) have for their British counterparts need look no further than the tales of the ace of spies, Sidney Reilly, and Robert Lockhart. Modern Russian agents are no doubt fed on a diet of perfidious Albion — as Lockhart turns from supportive friend of the new leaders to the astonishing plot to capture Lenin and Trotsky in the Kremlin. Lockhart claimed the intention was to “strip them to their nether garments” and parade them through Moscow, so humiliating them in front of their people; Service has little doubt that the real intention was to kill them.
Service’s cast list of journalists, diplomats, agents and their lovers is a joy. Emmeline Pankhurst wanders briefly across the stage. Though this is hardly an untold story, Service finds a winning combination of scholarship, narrative drive and detail to guide us through a constantly shifting set of realities. Here are the first fellow travelers — the men and women who saw what was really happening in revolutionary Russia, yet reported everything through their ideological spectacles. At the same time, Service makes clear that the governments of the West had enough clear information on the nature and intent of Lenin’s Bolshevik revolution. They could have prevented its consolidation. It was a lack of purpose they came to regret.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless