Over their decades of competition, the battle between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo has taken on many colors — brown (cola), orange (juice), blue (sport drinks) and clear (water).
Now, they are fighting over green: The beverage rivals are racing to become the first to produce a plastic soda bottle made entirely from plants.
But despite dueling announcements claiming technological breakthroughs, consumers should not expect to see many all-plant bottles on store shelves any time soon. Neither company is confident enough in the technology to say when, or even if, they will be able to deliver on their environmental ambitions.
Photo: Bloomberg
Coke delivered the latest volley on Thursday last week, saying it plans to work with three companies that are developing competing technologies to make plastic from plants, with bottles rolling out to consumers in perhaps a few years.
PepsiCo is aiming to beat that timeline and claim the 100 percent green label first. The company declared in March that it had cracked the code of the all-plant plastic bottle, and on Thursday, it said that it was on schedule to conduct a test next year that involved producing 200,000 bottles made from plant-only plastic.
But until Pepsi conducts the test, executives said they would not be able to predict when large-scale production of such bottles might begin. If the test fails to prove that the technologies favored by Pepsi are cost-effective at a commercial scale, more experimentation will be needed, said Denise Lefebvre, the company’s vice president for global beverage packaging.
Photo: Bloomerg
“The test is very important in really determining efficient cost and manufacturing processes,” Lefebvre said. She said the company was still working out details of the test, including what products to sell in the all-plant bottles and what type of plant materials to use to produce them.
Coke was the first out of the gate in the green bottle race, when in 2009 it began selling Dasani water in the US in bottles made with up to 30 percent plant-based plastics. (In some cases, recycled plastic may decrease the plant-based amount.)
On Thursday the company said that by 2020 all of its plastic bottles would meet the 30 percent plant-based standard.
But the company was more cautious about when it could start selling beverages in bottles made entirely from plant materials. “We will set the target once we have the commercial technology in place,” said Scott Vitters, the general manager of Coke’s plant bottle packaging platform.
One of Coke’s new partners, Virent, a Wisconsin-based biofuel and chemical company partly owned by Cargill, Shell and Honda, said it hoped to have a large-scale plant to produce plastic for beverage bottles up and running in 2015.
Vitters would say only that some commercial production of 100 percent plant-based plastic bottles was achievable “in the next few years.” The exception is Coke’s Odwalla juice brand, which already uses all plant-based material to make a type of plastic suitable for juices.
The two other companies working with Coke to develop the all-plant soda bottles are Gevo and Avantium.
Lefebvre said that Pepsi was following a similar path to the one Coke announced Thursday, teaming up with companies that are developing different ways of solving the plastic puzzle. But she declined to identify the partners.
Soda bottles are made from a type of plastic known as PET, which commonly has two main components. One, called MEG, makes up about 30 percent of a bottle’s weight, and is what Coke has been producing from plant sources, using sugarcane grown in Brazil.
The other component, called PTA, makes up 70 percent of a bottle’s weight. Scientists have been able to make PTA from plant materials in the laboratory but pulling off the same trick on an industrial scale has proved more difficult.
Vitters said that production capacity for MEG, used in the 30 percent plant bottle, was poised to increase drastically. The material is produced in only one facility today, but at least two additional factories are expected to begin production next year.
Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist at the National Resources Defense Council, an environmental group, said that the production processes involved in creating plastics from plant sources generated smaller amounts of greenhouse gases, which contribute to climate change, when compared with plastics made from petroleum.
But he said the source of the plant materials was important in assessing the environmental impact.
Hershkowitz said that using agricultural waste products, like corn stalks or other materials left over from farming, was better than using crops, such as sugarcane or corn that are grown specifically for plastic production.
Growing crops for plastic “causes a lot of land conversion, it affects the price of food, it uses a lot of fertilizers,” he said.
Pepsi has said it will use agricultural waste products, such as corn husks, pine bark or orange peels, to make its plastic bottles. Vitters said that Coke might use a variety of materials, including wastes and crops grown for plastic production.
Regardless of how they are produced, Hershkowitz said that plant-based plastics still create litter and solid waste problems. He said companies like Coke and Pepsi should endorse legislation that would require the food and consumer products industries to finance recycling operations, in order to greatly increase the amount of plastic recycled.
Both Coke and Pepsi have broad initiatives to make their operations more environmentally friendly, taking steps to cut back on factors such as water and energy use.
But the companies played down the potential marketing benefits inherent in being the first to the market with an all-plant bottle.
“We don’t feel it’s a race,” Lefebvre said. “We feel like were all working together to do better for the environment and also to make good business sense.”
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist