Jonathan Lethem’s fat, hip and garrulous new essay collection, The Ecstasy of Influence, is self-consciously in the tradition of books like Norman Mailer’s Advertisements for Myself and John Updike’s Hugging the Shore, brilliant grab-bag volumes that blended criticism, journalism and introspection. So it makes a kind of sense that Lethem debated, he tells us, calling this book either Advertisements for Norman Mailer or, even better, Shugging the Whore.
In an impish way, Shugging the Whore would have been perfect. It gets across Lethem’s anti-authoritarian streak, his instinctive distrust of preapproved canonical worthies like Updike, Saul Bellow and Thomas Pynchon. He’s a novelist who has spent a lifetime creating his own subversive pantheon, a jumpy CBGB’s of the literary soul.
Lethem’s crowded pantheon, The Ecstasy of Influence includes Marvel comic books and misfit writers like Philip K. Dick, J.G. Ballard, Shirley Jackson and Charles Willeford. It includes improvisational filmmakers like John Cassavetes, little-known bands like the Go-Betweens and rumpled, bohemian critics like Manny Farber. Lethem is all about the underdogs, and he counts himself snug among their number.
“Most of my heroes,” he declares, “are partly or entirely out of print.” Mailer gets a hall pass because he is, like Lethem, from Brooklyn, and because he took a grizzled interest in things like “graffiti, underground film, marijuana and space travel.”
Like almost everything Lethem has written, The Ecstasy of Influence is a reflection of, and a pixelated homage to, those whose work he fetishizes. If this book has a thesis, it’s this: For an artist, influence is everything. “Wasn’t the whole 20th century,” he writes, “a victory lap of collage, quotation, appropriation, from Picasso to Dada to Pop?” My iTunes and bookshelf, c’est moi.
Lethem’s fullest and wittiest explication of this idea arrives in this volume’s now famous title essay, which appeared in Harper’s Magazine in 2007. A cosmic response to Harold Bloom’s seminal book The Anxiety of Influence (1973), Lethem’s essay argues for the eager plundering of earlier art to make new art. Even better, he makes this argument in a seamless piece of prose that, you discover at the end, is almost entirely plagiarized from other sources. This is a lovely trick shot, a think piece with its head happily up its own kazoo.
The bummer — for me, although perhaps not for you — about most of Lethem’s riffs on his idols is that his tastes and mine, plotted on a Venn diagram, would hardly overlap at all. A little Philip K. Dick, J.G. Ballard and John Cassavetes, for me, go a long way. And about the whole Marvel comics thing, I’m with John Leonard, who observed about Lethem in The New York Review of Books in 2003: “It is time this gifted writer closed his comic books for good.”
His tastes aren’t mine. Who cares? Not me, not usually. I like reading Lethem’s sentences, and I concur with H.L. Mencken, who wrote that the best critics “make the thing charming, and that is always a million times more important than making it true.” Yet lionizing underdog after underdog often leads Lethem to oversell their stuff, doing no favors to them or to him.
In an essay reprinted here about the novelist Thomas Berger, for example, he seizes the opportunity “to shout that Thomas Berger is one of America’s three or four greatest living novelists.” To which anyone who has been paying attention — no disrespect at all to the gifted Berger — can only reply: Dude, please.
Several of the essays here marinate in the fish sauce that is literary gossip. One is a short account of Lethem’s time at Bennington College in the 1980s (he dropped out during his sophomore year), where he knew Donna Tartt and Bret Easton Ellis. He had a falling out with Tartt and, tongue slightly in cheek, wonders if she based the murdered Vermont farmer in her novel The Secret History on him.
About Ellis, he writes: “Bret stood perfectly for what outraged me at that school, and terrified me, too, the blithe conversion of privilege into artistic fame. It was inconvenient that I liked him.” On the morning of 9/11, Lethem confesses, he was sleeping off a hangover after a decadent night in Manhattan with Ellis. He compares Ellis to a child star, unable to grow up. “I still found him a figure of sympathy, like rooting for Jose Canseco or Barry Bonds.”
This same essay includes a drive-by tasering of Jonathan Franzen, about whom he declares, “His fame, then and now, had a Chauncey Gardiner quality, seeming called into being by a novelist-shaped vacancy on the cover of Time.”
In an essay called “My Disappointment Critic,” Lethem zeroes in on The New Yorker’s book critic, James Wood, who reviewed his novel The Fortress of Solitude less than positively in 2003. Lethem used to feel that Wood was “the most apparently gifted close reader of our time.” Not so much anymore.
For a sneaker-wearing boy from Brooklyn like Lethem, suddenly Wood’s “air of erudite amplitude veiled — barely — a punitive parochialism.” Wood, he says, writes like “an aristocrat who never really expected those below him to understand the function of the social order.” Another snooty writer, fired from Lethem’s canon.
This feisty, freewheeling book also includes a very funny essay about being on a high-level book tour in America, about being whisked from radio and TV stations to lavish nightly meals. One problem, Lethem says, is that there’s rarely time to perform certain ablutions.
Thus when you listen to writers being interviewed on some radio shows, he says, “you must know this: They are holding in a bowel movement.” Can our eyes unread that sentence? Can we ever listen to Terry Gross the same way again?
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located