You don’t have to be rich to collect art. All that’s required is a lot of passion and a willingness to work a second job to earn some extra money. This is the central premise of Invisibleness is Visibleness: International Contemporary Art Collection of a Salaryman — Daisuke Miyatsu, currently on view at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei (MOCA, Taipei).
Miyatsu, born in 1963, has become the stuff of legend in Japan’s art circles since the first exhibit of his collection, Why Not Live for Art?, was showcased at Tokyo Opera City Art Gallery in 2004. Known for his keen collector’s eye and compulsive research when deciding which works to buy, the salaryman is so obsessed with art (which MOCA, Taipei calls an “addiction”) that he’s had artists ink tattoos onto his body.
He commissioned 2002 Marcel Duchamp Prize winner Dominique Gonzalez-Foerster to design his “dream house,” a “work in progress” modernist structure located in a Tokyo suburb. It features a bathroom and wallpaper by Shimabuku, sliding screen doors by Yoshitomo Nara and a full-length mirror by Yayoi Kusama, among other objects, fixtures and designs by high-profile artists. The exhibit devotes a section to this house, complete with a model.
Photo Courtesy of Ota Fine Arts, Tokyo
“He’s a good student of art. He studied English for the express purpose of talking to artists overseas. During the weekends he goes to several exhibits and art openings because this is the time that you can meet artists and establish relationships with them — understand who they are and if they are in it for the long haul,” said Natasha Lo (羅健毓), the exhibit’s curator.
Lo added that Miyatsu “doesn’t go to art fairs — like Art Basel or the Venice Biennale — because his thinking is, ‘Why spend money on a plane ticket when the money can be used to buy a work of art?’” It should be noted that Miyatsu does go to international art fairs, but only when he’s invited to give a speech (as he will at the forthcoming Art Taipei, on Aug. 27 from 2:30pm to 4:30pm).
The MOCA, Taipei exhibit comprises 61 works by 51 artists from the 300-plus pieces in the collection amassed by Miyatsu, who started buying artwork in 1994 when he was 30 years old. Over the past 17 years, he’s spent NT$10 million (US$350,000) on art.
Photo Courtesy of Project Fulfill Art Space
While Miyatsu’s collecting habits may deserve an entry in the weighty Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“compulsive art collecting disorder,” say), there is no doubt that he is a boon to galleries and artists.
So, before going any further, let’s address the tricky business of a public art museum hosting an exhibit for a private collector — an enterprise that will probably boost the collection’s value.
As a March article in the New York Times by Judith H. Dobrzynski pointed out, single-collector exhibits raise several issues that pose a threat to their legitimacy.
“When the collectors are trustees or provide financing for an exhibition, it looks as if the museum is selling out to vanity shows or renting its galleries. If museums show a collection without the promise of a gift, they are seen as endorsing the art and elevating its value. If museums display art that comes with a gift, they seem — unless it is the entire collection — to be using a questionable fund-raising tool at best, or exacting a quid pro quo at worst. The question always arises as to who is making the curatorial decisions, museum or collector? And when collectors sell art after the exhibition, the museum looks as if it has been used.”
The exhibit largely avoids such criticism. MOCA, Taipei doesn’t have a permanent collection and is funded partly by the Taipei City Government and partly by the sale of museum tickets, catalogues and souvenirs. Critics, however, could point to the fact that the show’s curator operates Agora Art Project x Space (藝譔堂), a gallery that represents one artist in the show. Perhaps a bigger criticism revolves around the museum’s relinquishing of curatorial control to Lo and Miyatsu. Two things here: Are the curators transparent about these decisions and is the show worthwhile? For this reviewer, a resounding yes on both counts.
There seems to be agreement among art professionals (artists, curators and educators) that bureaucrats interfere too much in the decision-making process at public art institutions. The thinking goes that government officials in positions of power too often believe that these publicly funded institutions are their fiefdoms. There has recently been a vocal backlash over this issue, as the recent resignation of Taipei City Cultural Affairs Commissioner Hsieh Hsiao-yun (謝小醞) over controversies at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum (TFAM) illustrates.
In any event, Invisibleness is Visibleness deserves to be seen. It begins with a room-cum-shrine devoted to Miyatsu’s beloved Yayoi Kusama, and includes Infinity Dots, his first collected work (which, according to the collector’s chronology, was in 1994), as well as Infinity Net, his most valuable. (Lo said Miyatsu couldn’t afford to buy the latter work outright, so he arranged a two-year payment plan with the gallery.)
There is also a small section on conceptual art, featuring a 1972 visual installation by Vito Acconci (Untitled Project for Pier 17) and a 1996 sculpture by Jan Fabre (Krijgers Rozenkrans Warrior’s Rosary).
But the exhibit stands out mostly for its display of new media art, particularly by emerging video artists. Often this medium appears an amateur mix of music video and ad kitsch, and there are some videos here that are like that. But Takagi Masakatsu’s Tidal is a luscious and ethereal video of girls and women moving fluidly through space, celebrating the pleasures of youth, beauty and romance. Miyatsu certainly has a good eye.
However, as is often the case with exhibits at MOCA, Taipei, there is too much of a good thing. While watching Apichatpong Weerasethakul’s sumptuous video My Mother’s Garden, I was constantly distracted by Tadasu Takamine’s video God Bless America, a humorous, if screechy (the title song is sung throughout), take on American cultural imperialism, in the middle distance and the din of squealing pigs in Wu Chang-jung’s (吳長蓉) kaleidoscopic Documentary IV — Little Mince Cloth beyond. The 11 videos crammed into the second floor audiovisual space didn’t make for the best viewing experience.
Regardless, Invisibleness is Visibleness serves as a powerful argument to allow single-collector exhibits into the museum space — though with caveats — and proves its thesis that collecting art isn’t as exclusive a pastime as is sometimes thought.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located