Leah Missbach Day, 52, a photojournalist in Chicago, likes designer labels like Balenciaga, Alexander Wang and Dries Van Noten. But not next to her skin. “I cut them out because they’re scratchy and they bug me,” she said. “I’ve got a whole drawer full of tags.”
Though clothing designers and manufacturers may sweat the graphics and placement of their signature labels, many of their customers, armed with tiny sewing scissors and seam rippers, toil just as avidly to remove them. On the Web, several sites demonstrate how it’s done without leaving telltale holes.
But lately there’s been a trend toward subtlety and comfort in clothing labels. Big tags with blaring logos sewn inside garments are seen by many as passe (and forget about crocodiles and polo ponies stitched on the outside). More designers are downplaying or even disguising their labels, which can lend cachet, like a club with an unmarked door.
photo: BLOOMBERG
So-called “tagless” labels, printed directly onto clothes, are also more widely used, as are transparent plastic labels that are almost invisible. The result is a change in the way clothes look and feel.
Some people, like Day, find labels uncomfortable, while others object to having another person’s name or corporate logo on their clothes. Still others think tags detract from the attractiveness of garments, particularly when they show through something sheer or flip up so they are visible above a collar or waistband. (All the more distressing when strangers, or your mother-in-law, tuck them back in for you.)
TAG OUT
photo: BLOOMBERG
Susan Fisher, 56, of New York, who wears designer clothes by Donna Karan, Carolina Herrera and Jil Sander, uses nail scissors to snip the stitching around labels and tweezers to pull out the threads. “Why leave them in there when they’re only going to annoy you?” she said. “The washing instructions are meaningless to me because I err on the side of caution and dry clean everything, and I don’t really care who made it as long as it looks good on me.”
Those who are sensitive about their size may also be quick to cut out labels. Rozlind Power, 27, an events planner in Houston who used to sell clothes in a high-end boutique, said it’s common for people to remove labels if the size is bigger than their self-image. “It’s understandable when sizes vary so much,” Power said. “I wear an XS at Banana Republic but have a bridesmaid’s dress by Betsey Johnson that is size 10, which I would probably cut out if I had to look at it all the time.”
Zak Graff, 34, a marketing consultant in Los Angeles, said he likes the cut and fit of the Spanish brand Zara, but “the labels drive me crazy because they are 2 to 3 inches long and stacked one on top of another.” (Any clothing sold in the EU must have attached labels translated into every member country’s language.)
photo: BLOOMBERG
Graff keeps a seam ripper in his dopp kit to remove such aesthetic and potentially allergenic offenses. “I take out the labels when I cut off the hanging price tag,” he said. “It’s this whole process after I buy something new.”
But before he can remove a label, he has to actually see it. Some brands, like the French active-wear line Aigle, as well as Elie Tahari and Josie Natori have within the last three years begun using clear labels. Made of flexible plastic, these are usually in the side seam.
“It’s very much about comfort,” said Ilse Metchek, president of the California Fashion Association, which represents the state’s apparel manufacturers. “But it’s also a reflection of fabric being expensive and plastic being cheap, and there’s no sewing edges of the plastic label. Just a laser cut. Easy.”
NEW LABELS
Tagless labels, which first appeared a decade ago but have become more prevalent within the last two to three years, involve either stamping or ironing text onto the garment. “People really have issues with labels,” said Rick Elmore, vice president for product development at Hanesbrands, one of the first companies to feature tagless labels. “We were hearing it again and again.”
Athletic-wear brands including Nike, Adidas, Reebok and Puma soon followed, and now tagless labels can be found on garments made by many top brands including Banana Republic, J.Crew, Gap, Ann Taylor and H&M.
While there were early complaints that the ink used in tagless labels flaked and became prickly after several washings, the technology has improved. “The digital presses are more precise so we use less ink and it settles into the garment, so it doesn’t look as plasticky and it’s softer,” said Shawn Neville, vice president for retail branding at Avery Dennison Corp, which develops and makes labels. “That’s why you see more well-known brands going tagless these days.”
SECRET LOVE
But tagless labels can fade over time, according to Scott Schuman, who writes the Sartorialist fashion blog. “And then you end up putting on your T-shirt backwards, which is a total pain,” he said. He believes labels are an important design feature that denote quality and even add value like an artist’s signature on a print. Indeed, vintage clothes with intact labels sell for higher prices than those without. “We all like to complain about labels but we secretly love them,” Schuman said.
Nontraditional designer labels can be a mark of distinction. Consider Martin Margiela’s blank white label, Stella McCartney’s delicate metal chain, Peggy Jennings’ bit of lace and Rick Owens’ two slim, parallel gray ribbons.
Ken Downing, fashion director at Neiman Marcus, said, “With many designers less intrigued with the idea of logos, the artistic tag begins a new conversation with the consumer,” serving as an “insiders’ inside message.”
Owens described his label as an artisanal gesture. “It was always important to me that there be a personal, intimate connection between what I did and whoever responded to it,” he said.
And even Graff in Los Angeles leaves the iconic plaid tag in his Burberry suit because he thinks it’s a “unique design element.”
Marcia Sherrill, 50, a handbag designer in New York, said she has a “moment of bonding” looking at the designer labels in her clothes before getting dressed. “To see the Givenchy and Yves Saint Laurent brands is a reminder that this little girl from Alabama made good,” she said.
That doesn’t stop her, though, from putting a Band-Aid over them to keep them from scratching.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would