The work of Carl Andre, one of the only minimalists to accept the term, is often as barely there as sculpture can get. In the first book to survey his ascetic half-century career, a maximalist doorstop published this month by Phaidon, the art historian Alistair Rider relates the story of a German artist who enthusiastically sought out Andre’s work at a gallery in 1967, only to become confused when he couldn’t find it. This was because the work, 100 square plates of hot-rolled steel arranged in a rectangle almost completely covering the gallery entryway, was directly beneath his feet. He had mistaken it for the flooring.
For more than two decades Andre, who turns 76 this year, has been almost as spectral a presence in the art world as his most inconspicuous floor pieces. He has shown regularly, at the Paula Cooper Gallery in New York and around the world; but he rarely appears in public and speaks for the record even less than he did when he was young, which was not a lot. So it was disconcerting to meet him one recent afternoon in the hallway outside his Greenwich Village apartment, where he was waiting on the other side of the elevator door; he smiled, stuck out his hand and said, “Hi, I’m Carl Andre,” pronouncing his last name with a flat “a,” in contrast to the broad “a” (“bahthtub,” “auhnt”) he carries conspicuously from his youth in Quincy, Massachusetts.
Andre still dresses in the bib overalls that have been his uniform for decades, the sartorial stamp of an unorthodox lifelong Marxism. He also still lives in the same 34th-floor apartment, in a nondescript 1970s tower near New York University, where his life changed instantly and irrevocably one early morning in 1985, when his third wife, the promising Cuban artist Ana Mendieta, fell to her death from a bedroom window after an argument with Andre, who later told the police he was not in the room when she fell. After a highly publicized trial three years later he was acquitted of second-degree murder, but the death cast a shadow over an already difficult career, greatly reducing his visibility as a pioneer of one of the most important art movements of the postwar period.
The Mercer Street apartment became the symbolic locus of a deep divide in the art world between Andre’s friends and supporters and those who believed — and still believe — he was responsible for his wife’s fall, some of whom took up her death as a feminist cause at a time when female artists were struggling mightily for greater recognition.
Andre and his fourth wife, the artist Melissa Kretschmer, invited a reporter to the apartment for a rare yet wide-ranging conversation about the Phaidon book, Carl Andre: Things in Their Elements, and about a retrospective being planned by Dia:Beacon for 2013, which will be the first US survey of his work since a 1970 show at the Guggenheim Museum. The new show and the publication seem to suggest a slowly growing separation between views of Andre’s life and his work, beginning to occur as he has all but stopped traveling and making new work. Until relatively recently he insisted that pieces could be made only by him, on site, in response to the space where they would remain.
One of his last major permanent pieces — a long-planned outdoor work for the Chinati Foundation, the shrine to minimalism in Marfa, Texas — was installed last year based on his plans but without his presence. Called Chinati Thirteener, the work covers a courtyard space of a U-shaped former Army barracks. It is formed of a bed of brown gravel, atop which 13 separated rows of steel plates sit, evoking the railroad tracks that run conspicuously through the heart of Marfa — though, strictly speaking, Andre’s works aren’t supposed to evoke anything other than the materials from which they are made and the space they occupy.
During a reporter’s visit to Marfa in the spring, the plates, which had originally been a flat gray, had begun to bloom with what Rob Weiner, Chinati’s curator at large, called “chrysanthemums of rust,” bright orange arcs and triangles formed by moisture on the metal.
Sitting at a dining table in the one-bedroom apartment in New York, furnished with a hodgepodge of filing cabinets and bookshelves and a few of Kretschmer’s pieces, Andre said he was happy to hear about the weathering, which in the context of his work can seem to be an almost painterly effect, though he said he was equally happy that nature, and not he, had created it.
“I’ve never made one stroke of a brush that convinced me of anything,” he said.
In person Andre is slightly less daunting than his work, doctrinaire but energetically talkative and witty in a bone-dry New England way. The work of almost all the artists in the 1960s whose work came to be labeled minimalist — Donald Judd, Dan Flavin, Anne Truitt, Robert Morris —can look positively flamboyant next to his, which is mostly made from a small range of industrial metals, along with granite, wood and brick.
Manifest Destiny, a work installed permanently at 101 Spring Street in Manhattan’s SoHo neighborhood, which was Judd’s home and studio, is composed solely of eight Empire bricks, stacked vertically on their sides.
Writing in the New York Times in 1970 about the Guggenheim show, the critic Peter Schjeldahl wrote that Andre’s works present themselves to the viewer “with an aggressive air of completeness and finality, as if each were the only, or anyway the last, work of art in the world.” With dry understatement, he added, “Andre is not much fun.”
Looking back on his work Andre does not disagree, but he insisted: “I’m not a zealot. I’m only a zealot subjectively, for myself.”
“I have found a set of solutions to a set of problems in sculpture, and I work within those parameters,” Andre said. “But it is limits that give us possibilities. Without limits nothing really good can be accomplished. I feel I’ve been liberated by them. I can’t tell you the number of awful ideas I’ve had in my life.”
The story of the evolution of his one big idea (though he shies away even from a word so indefinite, insisting, “There are no ideas hiding under those plates — they’re just plates”) has taken deep root in the lore of minimalism over the years. Andre and the painter Frank Stella befriended each other in New York in the late 1950s, and Andre was deeply influenced by Stella’s rigidly pared-down parallel-line paintings.
As Andre tells it, on one occasion he was carving a Brancusi-inspired vertical wood sculpture with recesses suggesting the spaces between ladder rungs, when Stella took a look at the plain, un-carved back of the sculpture and remarked that it was good sculpture too. What he had apparently meant was that Andre might consider carving that side as well, but Andre understood the words differently, that perhaps the untouched flat side of the timber was better than what he had carved. And he decided that Stella was right. “I had been thinking about using plain units of material anyway,” he said, “but that absolutely crystallized it.”
He began, in a formulation that became the bedrock of his work, to think of sculpture not as cuts in materials but as cuts in space formed by materials. Or as he also put it, with a Delphic flair that has marked his writing and a large body of word-based work he has made throughout his career, “A thing is a hole in a thing it is not.”
More than those of almost any 20th-century sculptor, his pieces have commanded space not vertically but horizontally, along the ground, which he describes as partly a practical matter.
“Art is about seizing and holding space,” he said. “And it was always easier to do that by putting 144 pieces along the floor than by stacking them up.” (He laughed when it was suggested that, in a sense, his works own the air rights above them.) But the flatness is also quintessentially American; he considers roads, he said, to be ideal sculptures.
The narrow road that Andre set for himself as an artist, one from which he has rarely strayed, has never been easy, even before the Mendieta case. Only over the past decade has he been able to live off the proceeds of the sale of his work, according to Rider, the art historian. For a time in the 1960s he paid the bills by working as a freight brakeman and conductor on the Pennsylvania Railroad.
Andre’s father, a marine draftsman, typified the reaction of many viewers and even a good share of art critics well into the latter part of his son’s career.
“When I was starting to get a little international recognition, he said, ‘Oh, Carl, you can always talk a good game, can’t you?”’
The Phaidon book does not address the questions surrounding Mendieta’s death head-on but acknowledges that it remains difficult to separate from his career. “Reputations, it should be emphasized, never exist outside time,” Rider writes.
Asked about the effect the death has had on him, Andre spoke forthrightly, if only briefly.
“It didn’t change my view of the world or of my work, but it changed me, as all tragedy does,” he said. “But I have people who love me and believe in me.”
In the twilight of his career he seems to have little interest in memorializing it. Though he agreed to be interviewed to promote the Phaidon monograph, he declined to be photographed for this article and referred to the book almost dismissively on Phaidon’s Web site as a thing “assembled by others from fragments of my work,” like a “geological core sample.”
Of the Dia:Beacon retrospective, he said — over Kretschmer’s chiding — that he had informed the curators, “I can’t stop you from doing it, but don’t expect me to do anything to help.” He allowed that he might go to see it, but would not go so far as to say that he might enjoy it.
“I’m a rather phlegmatic person,” he said conclusively, at the end of a three-hour interview. “I can’t really experience a thing until I’ve experienced it.”
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and