Fri, Jul 15, 2011 - Page 16 News List

Movie review: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Though he neglects to tie up several loose ends, director David Yates has got fully to grips with the main points of the narrative in the grand finale of the Harry Potter franchise

By Ian Bartholomew  /  Staff Reporter

Photos courtesy of Warner Bros Entertainment

It was a remarkably satisfying conclusion to the Potter franchise earlier this week at a 3D press screening at the Showtime Cinema on Linsen North Road in Taipei, but the excitement among the crowd of media and movie industry workers was considerably more muted than the very palpable anticipation of the much more massive crowds that were present for the first screening of Transformers: Dark of the Moon last month.

As has been pointed out more than once, those invested in the Harry Potter series will not want to miss this final installment, but given the serpentine intricacy of a plot developed over eight long feature films, those who aren’t probably couldn’t care less. The release in 3D for this last installment was an unnecessary piece of froufrou that was wholly inadequate to capture the interest of those whose only interest is in witnessing the latest cinematic spectacle.

So, disposing of the 3D issue, for anyone who has given the Harry Potter series any attention over the past decade, the finale has everything that one might hope for. It is conceived on an epic scale, and climbs on the shoulders of the more pedestrian and difficult Deathly Hallows: Part 1, drawing the story to a conclusion that is suffused with melancholy. Many characters who played major roles in previous films are given cameos, almost as if taking their curtain call, and many details of the plot are explained.

With its wealth of detail and picking up themes from many of the earlier installments, this final chapter is likely to get many people returning to the series to follow it through once again from the beginning.

The film is unabashed about leaving behind anyone who hasn’t boned up on their Harry Potter lore, diving into the complex endgame of the story with a minimum of preamble. This has been the policy of David Yates since he took over with the fifth Potter movie (Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix in 2007), and on the whole it has paid off, giving him more time to craft an appearance of depth and body to J.K. Rowling’s convoluted mythologizing. For newcomers, it makes the film all but incomprehensible. It must be said, that with its oodles of Gothic atmosphere, high melodrama and some clever effects, the film provides a visual feast that helps carry the audience along even when aspects of the narrative may be far from clear.

The three main characters, Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), for all the hype that surrounds them, have been given parts that are underwritten, and Potter’s charisma is not particularly evident in Radcliffe’s rather shuffling performance. There are, of course, the romantic resolutions, and the big kissing scene between Potter and Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright), and also that between Ron and Hermione, seem unearned and cheesy. Yates is better with the dark side of the conflict, and doesn’t shy away from showing the death of much-loved characters as the cost of victory.

A few cameos put the still immature talent of the stars in a startling and not particularly welcome perspective. An early scene with John Hurt as Ollivander, the maker of wizarding wands, provides some exposition about the importance of a certain magical artifact. It is a rather thankless role that Hurt manages with superb conviction, and even playing a shriveled old man, his screen presence overwhelms Radcliffe’s heroic efforts. It is splendid to see Maggie Smith letting her hair down as a re-invigorated professor Minerva McGonagall, but other fine actors, Ciaran Hinds and Kelly Macdonald in particular, are little better than extras.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top