“I don’t know what I was thinking.”
So said Anthony Weiner in a news conference moments after finally admitting that he had sent naughty photos of himself to women he had met on the Internet.
The married former congressman, who resigned Thursday, 10 days after that confessional news conference, might not know what he had been thinking — but scientists have an idea or two.
Photo: AFP
Scholars were studied brain architecture and chemistry long before Weiner pinged photos of his unmentionables into cyberspace. And their research — some of it subject to dispute — suggests that physiology played a role in Weiner’s digital dalliances.
“Most people who get as far as he’s gotten are high-testosterone people,” said Helen Fisher, the biological anthropologist and a member of the Center for Human Evolutionary Studies in the anthropology department at Rutgers. “Along with that ambition comes a high sex drive. Testosterone’s linked with both of them.”
According to some, seeking prominence is part of an inborn survival strategy.
“Men, particularly successful men, have an evolutionary history of polygamy,” said David Geary, curators’ professor in the department of psychological sciences at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Men who pursue politics are also pursuing power, Geary said, and “from an evolutionary perspective the whole goal of men striving for power is to increase their access to sexual opportunities.”
But in an era of easily followed digital footprints, the chances of catting around and being caught are greater than ever. So why cheat and tweet?
One possible answer: There’s a correlation between testosterone and risk-taking.
“If you asked one of these guys ‘What are the chances of you getting caught?’ you would see an underestimation of the risks,” Geary said. “And the severity of the consequences is underestimated.” Women, on the other hand, said Geary, “tend to focus on the potential harm of the consequences.”
(Studies about subjects other than sex — like money — have also reported a link between testosterone and overconfidence.)
According to Fisher, women have on average more long-range neural connections than most men. As a result, she said, men tend to narrowly focus on the here and now instead of potential long-term consequences.
A convenient excuse for philandering? “I’m not going to excuse this guy or any of them,” Fisher said, referring to Weiner, “but when he says ‘I don’t know what I was thinking,’ he probably literally was not seeing or evaluating or weighing properly all of the outcomes for this. He was focused on the short term.”
Gender generalizations are a dangerous area. Men and women are more alike than different, and their neurological differences have historically been used to justify sexism. Among the most notable: women were once considered less intelligent than men when studies showed their brains weren’t as big.
Critics also contend that many neurological gender studies have too-small subject groups, or other design flaws.
And it’s not always clear how or whether neurological differences translate into specific behavior. Our actions are shaped by other factors as well, like personal experiences, culture and genetics.
Bianca Acevedo, a National Science Foundation postdoctoral researcher fellow in the department of psychological and brain sciences at the University of California, Santa Barbara, explained in an e-mail: “For example, individuals that need to exert much control in their daily lives [such as powerful politicians] may have less cognitive resources to regulate their behavior in other life domains.”
That said, studies that have nothing to do with gender differences still underscore just how powerless someone — male or female — can feel in the grip of sexual desire.
Brain areas involving desire are activated in the blink of an eye — less than 200 milliseconds, according to research by Stephanie Ortigue, an assistant professor at the psychology department at Syracuse University and at the University of Geneva in Switzerland, and Francesco Bianchi-Demicheli, also of the University of Geneva.
Even before you realize that some detail about a person has caught your eye, be it in an online photograph or while passing on a sidewalk, your unconscious brain knows that person will activate your reward system, and your brain begins to anticipate the reward.
“People have this urge and there’s a loss of control,” said Ortigue, who studied desire and the brain by putting electrodes on the heads of college students and monitoring them while they observed photographs of men and women in swimsuits. The urge washes over people in a moment between unconsciousness and consciousness, a moment that Ortigue calls the sexual zone, or S-zone. “There in the S-zone, at this moment in time, their attention is suddenly focused on that reward,” she said, “and everything else around them suddenly doesn’t exist anymore.”
In the S-zone, patients report losing track of time. The future (i.e. having to resign from your job as a congressman) is not a consideration. Incidentally, when asked if this myopic euphoria happens with nonsexual cravings — like a yen for a buttery croissant — Ortigue said yes.
“You lose track of time and there is nothing but the croissant in your life,” she said. “Afterwards, you think about all of the bad consequences of that, and you regret, and you feel guilty.”
Scholars say the decision to act on a desire depends on past positive associations that a person has between a particular stimulus and a behavior. For instance, after numerous online interactions with women, Weiner likely discovered that such encounters were guaranteed to deliver pleasure.
And those feelings are reinforced by the brain chemical dopamine, which is also triggered by novelty — which in Weiner’s case may have taken the form of new electronic liaisons. (Some scholars say novelty is yet another evolutionary strategy: varied genetic combinations are optimal for survival.)
Most people are capable of loving someone and yet cheating on them with someone else, according to Fisher. Referring to Weiner, she said: “He’s probably deeply attached to his wife. He’s probably still in love with his wife. This is basically not about his wife.”
Women, mind you, don’t appear to be angels, either. Under age 40, women cheat about as much as men, according to Fisher. There was a time, though, when scholars thought women were very different from men.
Consider the words of the neurologist Charles Dana, who in the early 1900s opposed women’s suffrage partly because of the structural differences between male and female brains and bodies. As he wrote in the New York Times 96 years ago this month: “They point the way to the fact that woman’s efficiency lies in a special field and not in that of political initiative.”
Then again, perhaps he was on to something. At a time when the nation’s politicians include the likes of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Newt Gingrich and Weiner, “political initiative” has an entirely new meaning.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would