Terrifying techno thrillers or grisly horror flicks are the more familiar face of South Korean cinema today, but one of its star directors, Hong Sang-soo, in the French capital this week to give a master class, looks instead at daily banalities and their cruel and comical details.
“Life is too complicated to be interpreted in an ideological way,” he said in an interview ahead of his class at Paris’ Cinimatheque, which is holding a retrospective of his work this month and screening his 10th feature, the Cannes-winning Ha Ha Ha.
“Most conclusions are lies,” he said, explaining the absence of political talk or context in his films, often set in or around Seoul and focused on fraught emotional relationships between thirtysomething writers, artists, businessmen and teachers.
Photo: EPA
“It is always a tiny but concrete thing from reality that shakes my convictions, and it is precisely this discovery in itself that interests and stimulates me the most,” Hong said.
For Hong, 50, truth is in the details. “Preconceived ideas feel like an oppression,” he said.
In 2005, the Cinimatheque — the main hub of film culture in Paris — devoted a season to South Korean cinema, touting it as “one of the most dynamic in the world. Everyone is talking about it. No cinema attracts as much attention.”
The surge started in the 1990s when South Korea also created an international film festival in Pusan, a clear sign that the national industry had serious ambitions to become a rival to Hollywood.
Since then hits have followed one after the other, not only at screens in Asia but also in Europe and North America, with the likes of Bong Joon-hoo’s The Host, Im Sang-soo’s The Housemaid and another Cannes success from 2010, Lee Chang-dong’s Poetry.
International critics tend to read into South Korean films a symbolism related to the country’s recent history: Japanese occupation, partition and the civil war.
Yet Hong rarely brings these elements into his movies, and dismisses attempts to see Pyongyang as weighing heavily on his psyche or that of his characters.
Yes, people talk about North Korea, “but they have become blase,” he said.
He avoids generalizations, insisting “every human being is different and I have no idea what an archetype of the average South Korean is.”
“The important thing for me is to discover the small things in daily life. This motivates me the most, it is what gives me the courage to live,” Hong said.
Hong was born in Seoul in 1960 and spent eight years studying film in California before returning home to shoot his first feature, The Day a Pig Fell into the Well in 1996.
He does not think of himself as part of a broader movement, which critics call the South Korean new wave. “I do not see myself as being imprisoned in a single category,” he said.
The diversity of work coming from South Korea is indeed striking, from stylized horror, black comedy, sexual psycho-thrillers, and Hong’s own radically banal domestic sagas.
One consistent factor in his working method is the lack of one: he has no time for rules, formats or predictable narratives. And while he injects drama in his films — outbursts of anger, emotionally-charged sex scenes, shocking cruelty between lovers — it is never melodrama.
The director also avoids cliches. He never, for example, shows the landmark sights of Seoul nor tries to beautify his country’s landscape or present it as exotic.
When his characters walk to a temple, we never see them arrive. A stunning cathedral is partly cut out of the frame when a couple meet for the first time, the camera focusing instead on a bush of violet, bee-infested chrysanthemums.
Freewheeling to the core, he even finds a notebook restrictive so carries loose file cards to jot down his ideas. A notebook must stay together “whereas with these cards I can just throw one away,” he said.
Similarly, he is known for finishing a day’s script only half an hour before the cameras start to roll, and constantly changes the trajectory of his characters depending on the personality of the actor playing the role.
He — like many in South Korea’s efflorescent filmmaking generation — does not offer comfortable portraits of the nation but reveals unexpected truths about human relationships today.
“It’s the small details that keep me fresh!” he said.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless