His mantra of “winning” has taken the Internet by storm — more than 2 million people follow him on Twitter — but for Charlie Sheen, the obvious question is: has he completely lost the plot?
The troubled star’s sacking from the hit TV show Two and a Half Men on Monday came after the 45-year-old hurled himself into what Warner Brothers called his “self-inflicted disintegration” over the past two weeks.
In almost daily media outbursts he railed at his former bosses on the TV series, drawing accusations of anti-Semitism and mutterings that — like Mel Gibson before him — he would never work in Hollywood again.
Photo: Reuters
On Monday, Warner Bros Television announced his sacking “effective immediately,” while a lawyers’ letter referred to his “dangerously self-destructive conduct.”
“Now, the entire world knows Mr Sheen’s condition from his alarming outbursts over just the last few weeks,” it said, lamenting “the public spectacle of his self-inflicted disintegration.”
That spectacle has included repeated claims by Sheen that he is “winning,” because everyone else would love to have his life of money, women and drugs, and that his critics are just jealous losers, whose life he despises.
Public relations experts say that Sheen could still emerge victorious from his public relations crisis — partly by making money from his own online activities, including attracting sponsorship for his hugely-successful Twitter feed.
“Charlie wants to capitalize on his current fame and publicity as much as he can right now because the future is uncertain and because he’s without a job,” said public relations expert Dan Shawbel.
“He will leverage his Twitter feed, Ustream.com channel, and other online outlets to monetize his personal brand,” he added, referring to the live streaming show, Sheen’s Korner, which aired over the weekend on Ustream.com.
Another Hollywood public relations professional, Jerome Cleary, added: “If I was Charlie Sheen I would immediately do a deal for a reality show to begin filming this week with E! or HBO or Showtime.
“I think Charlie is with it and happening and I think it’s great that he is using Twitter and UStream initiatives and I would encourage even more.”
Monday’s sacking could certainly be a turning point: Some had argued that Sheen was playing a clever game, pressing CBS to get a better deal — in one outburst last week he said wanted US$3 million an episode, up from US$2 million.
That is clearly no longer realistic. The TMZ celebrity Web site reported that Sheen would follow through on a threat to sue Two and a Half Men producer Chuck Lorre and Warner Brothers over his dismissal.
And it cited Sheen himself as saying: “This is very good news. It is a big day of gladness at the Sober Valley Lodge,” the ironic name he has given his home outside Los Angeles.
Whatever happens in the coming days, Sheen follows in a grand tradition of Hollywood stars going off the rails. Other recent examples include Mickey Rourke, Robert Downey Jr, Britney Spears, and Lindsay Lohan.
Gibson’s career has never recovered from a 2006 drunk driving incident in which he was reported to have made anti-Semitic remarks, fueling a slide that has also included allegations of domestic abuse.
One major difference, of course, is the explosion of social media.
In a world of Twitter, Facebook and easy ability to livestream anything you say or do, Sheen has the power to broadcast his own message, without the need for huge budgets, or the filter from traditional media.
Public relations expert Cleary said Sheen’s sacking from Two and a Half Men won’t necessarily be a bad thing.
“I do not think it adds to the damage because the public obviously loves it. He pushed Miley Cyrus, Lindsey and Britney right off the front pages and stole all of their thunder with his new vocabulary and zaniness,” he said.
“Charlie does not care and now the door is wide open for either reality TV or another TV show to grab him up. He’s talented, funny, provocative. I do not think Charlie cares if he gets fired.”
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and