Harry Potter films have been with us for a decade now, and since Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was released in 2001, the movies have grown in sophistication while remaining fundamentally much the same. And although Dave Yates’ third bite of the Harry cherry is in many respects a superior film — and certainly a more complex one — compared to Chris Columbus’ effort (Sorcerer’s Stone), something of the magic has evaporated from the franchise. Perhaps Harry has outstayed his welcome with everyone but loyal fans of the books.
As the beginning of the end of the Harry Potter series, the release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 might lay some claim to being an historic cinema event, but you would never have guessed that from the jejune mood of the crowd gathered for the press and industry preview in Ximending earlier this week. This was just another big budget release, and it wasn’t even in 3D.
The title alone, with its “part one” suffix, puts it on par with a television series and promises potential viewers they will be underwhelmed. After all, you already know, before stepping into the cinema, that there will be no denouement at the end of the film. At the press screening, the momentary appearance of James and Oliver Phelps (who play the Weasley twins, minor characters with only a couple of minutes screen time), raised a few half-hearted cheers.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros
On the way out, this reviewer overheard more than one comment about how the film had failed to excite. People couldn’t understand what was going on. This is hardly surprising, for given the length of the later Harry Potter novels, it has been impossible for director Yates, who came in on the fifth movie, to incorporate the increasingly elaborate background that is required to make any real sense of J.K. Rowling’s novels.
Yates has proved the best of the directors to take on the Harry Potter challenge, though Alfonso Cuaron’s work on Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was impressive. Although Yates has proven outstanding in grounding these fantasy films in contemporary issues, he has always erred on the side of faithfulness in following the novels. It is this loyalty to the original material that can disappoint.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is far from being the best of the Harry Potter novels, and even at their best the books fall well short of any claim to literary distinction. When considered in the narrow arena of teen fiction, Deathly Hallows still reads more like a scenario for a role-playing game than a novel.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros
There are seven objects that Potter must destroy in order to overcome his nemesis, and one by one he needs to seek them out and find a way of dispatching them. These items are “Horcruxes” and I would challenge anyone not familiar with the books to understand what they are and their significance just by watching this film.
With the significance of the central objects of the movie so obscure, it is hard for their discovery and disposal to provide much in the way of dramatic tension. Indeed, Part 1 ends with three Horcruxes still to be destroyed. Staying tuned for Part 2 means hanging on for more Horcrux search-and-destroy episodes until this time next year. That’s a long wait for what will likely be a measly payoff.
To be fair, Deathly Hallows is a fine product for those who have followed the series, with outstanding performances by the central characters. We have watched Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger) and Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) mature significantly as actors over the past decade.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros
This film has left the cloistered world of Hogwarts behind and sees our three heroes out in the great yonder, on the brink of sexual awakening. Yates handles this aspect of the film particularly well, reflecting his enormous experience in TV drama. He treats sexual jealously and associated issues seriously, but also with a gentle knowing humor that gives this big film a few moments of real intimacy.
There is a touristic aspect to Deathly Hallows and the young protagonists run from their pursuers through some of the most scenic areas of British wilderness, where we can see Yates striving for the effects that generated such a huge response in Lord of the Rings. These rural settings are not Yates’ forte — he works much better in the domestic and political arena.
There is much to criticize in the overall realization of The Deathly Hallows Part 1, and much to praise in the details. The fine performances from Radcliffe and Watson, along with the film’s extraordinary ensemble cast of minor characters, are worth the price of admission. As a total cinematic experience, however, it does not really register. This is not much more than a visual, and somewhat superficial, representation of a mediocre book.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s