It’s plentiful, portable, durable, and so simple that even a child can use one. It’s the Avtomat Kalashnikova, or AK-47, the assault rifle that Josef Stalin gave to the world and that long outlived the Cold War.
Named for the man credited with its invention, Mikhail Kalashnikov, and the year the Soviet Union adopted it, 1947, the AK-47 is an in-between weapon — lighter and shorter than previous infantry rifles yet more accurate and powerful than a submachine gun. C.J. Chivers, in his exhaustive and bleak history The Gun, concludes that the weapon will have a strong influence on armed conflict for decades to come.
The AK-47 had fewer moving parts than typical automatic rifles, and those parts were loose-fitting and massive, making a dirty gun less likely to jam. The Soviets gave these durable machines to just about anyone who might advance their goals, and even helped their neighbors — including China — build their own AK factories. The world is awash in AKs and their progeny.
“These weapons began as a means to equip standing armies,” Chivers writes. “But the nations that made them lost custody of them, and then control, and now in much of the world they are everyman’s gun.”
Small arms were the weapon of choice in 46 of 49 major conflicts in the 1990s, in which 4 million people died, Chivers says, citing a UN report. AKs and AK knockoffs were the primary rifles used.
Flags and vodka
Today they appear on flags and as props in terrorist videos. US Marines practice breaking down and reassembling them, “just in case.” There’s even a Kalashnikov vodka.
Chivers, a New York Times senior writer who served in the Marine Corps in the Gulf War, combines a soldier’s experience with an historian’s skepticism. You probably won’t be able to trade a chicken for an AK, as is sometimes asserted, he says; one can be had for a few head of cattle. More tellingly, he shows how the price of an AK is a barometer of how dangerous a place has become.
His tale starts in the 1860s with inventor and businessman Richard Gatling and proceeds to Hiram Maxim, the sadist and possible trigamist, Chivers says, who developed one of the first viable automatic weapons.
When you fire a rifle, it recoils and releases a burst of gas. Automatic weapons harness that wasted energy to eject the spent cartridge and push back a bolt. The bolt then bounces off a spring and smashes into the next cartridge, setting the process in motion again. After Maxim, automatics grew smaller and deadlier, culminating in the abattoir that was World War I.
Creature of propaganda
The life of Kalashnikov himself is obscured in Soviet secrecy and mendacity. He may have been the resourceful tinkerer of popular myth. Yet according to Chivers he was also the willing creature of a propaganda machine that gave him more credit than he deserved for the work of many hands.
Kalashnikov, who celebrated his 90th birthday in November last year, seeks credit when his gun is put to uses he likes — such as defending the motherland — and disavows responsibility for the destruction it causes elsewhere.
“I have always tried to knock down that annoying stereotype: if you are a weapons designer, you are a murderer,” Chivers quotes him as saying.
Chivers contrasts the AK with the American-made M16, which he says was issued to US troops in Vietnam before it was ready for jungle duty. It corroded and jammed, sometimes with fatal consequences. Some soldiers would abandon their M16s in favor of captured AKs. Though the American weapon has since been improved, the damage was done.
The greatest strength of The Gun lies in the stories told by rank-and-file gunfighters. Chivers devotes space to child soldiers in Uganda, Marines in Southeast Asia and Kurdish bodyguards in northern Iraq. One by one, they describe what it’s like to shoot, and be shot by, this killing machine, a device that can unload hundreds of bullets in a minute.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless