Bald statistics, such as those derived from research by the Millennium Cohort Study last week, will have done little to alleviate the stress of the relatively new parent.
According to widespread interpretation, a nine-month-old who is not yet sitting up, crawling or capable of accurately picking up objects using coordinated fingers and thumb may struggle at school at age 5. They don’t share as much — ergo are more antisocial — and fall behind their classmates. On an already overcrowded checklist, the results provide one more worry for anxious parents who could conclude their young offspring, perhaps slow to reach such milestones, are doomed.
This is not the intention of the survey’s researchers, though it certainly made for fear-inducing headlines. The unique study, which follows in the footsteps of the UK’s Mass Observation, is following up to 19,000 children born at the beginning of the 21st century and is being carried out by the Center for Longitudinal Studies at London University’s Institute of Education. It is charting children up to the age of 11, monitoring the impact of poverty, parenting, education and health to establish how these factors can affect their later years, and should deliver invaluable information to parents, healthcare specialists and policy-makers.
The study did conclude that those children who did not reach certain developmental achievements at 9 months, which was one in 10, did less well in their first year at primary school. Social factors did not seem to affect this finding. Other factors influencing children’s behavior in their first year at school include those growing up in “persistent poverty” performing less well than “those in families who had never received means-tested benefits.” The study also found that a good mother-child relationship “significantly benefits the cognitive and behavioral development of children in poor families.”
There are no data, as yet, on the impact of this developmental delay beyond 5 years to determine whether such children do eventually catch up. What this report has done, however, is draw attention to the fact that developmental delays can, and should, be assessed early.
By no means, its authors have pointed out, is it proof that children will be forever developmentally disadvantaged.
“Some children grow more slowly than others,” Professor Heather Joshi, the study group’s director, told BBC Radio. “We are saying there could be a cause of concern, not that there must be a cause for concern. The biology of it would need to be investigated.”
Other findings indicated that three-year-olds whose parents read to them every day were two months ahead of their peers in the first year of primary school, not only in language and literacy, but also in math. However, there was no “significant” decline for those at the same age who watched TV for two or more hours a day.
The education of the mother also emerged as a significant factor at the age of 5. Those whose mothers had fewer than five A-Cs at GCSE trailed far behind those born to mothers with degrees: They lagged by 6.5 months in math and 6.6 months in literacy.
Results from the MCS always provoke debate. These latest were drawn from the third sweep of the sample, which took place between early 2006 and early 2007. A fourth sweep, of the children at 7, finished in December 2008, and a fifth sweep will take place in 2012.
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and