“You’ve been in the sun,” a woman remarked when she saw me last month, a hint of disapproval in her voice.
“No,” I was pleased to be able to reply. “I just use a tinted face cream and makeup to match.”
You see, I’ve learned my lesson, sort of. I’ve had four precancers (medically, actinic keratoses) removed from my face in recent years, the consequence of decades of unprotected exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun. From my teens through my 30s, I devoted hours to baking in the summer sun coated with baby oil, not sunscreen.
So far I’ve been fortunate — no skin cancers yet and minimal facial wrinkles at age 68. But I decided awhile back not to push my luck. I would rather not be the one in six Americans who eventually develops skin cancer. So I apply a facial moisturizer with sunscreen several times a day, and in spring through fall I minimize my time in the midday sun. I also wear sunglasses with full UV protection both for comfort and to protect against cataracts.
But I admit to two failings. Despite the admonitions of my dermatologist, who gives his patients guidelines called “Confessions of a Pale Dermatologist,” I don’t wear hats even though I know I should don one with a 10cm brim when walking or working outdoors. And I still love that tan look.
Now, though, I can acquire a summery glow far more safely from a tube.
ATTITUDES ABOUT TANS
A walk through pharmacy aisles attests to the popularity of two kinds of products: potent full-spectrum sunscreens that protect against cancer-causing sunburn and wrinkled leathery skin, and artificial tanning lotions, creams and sprays. When used correctly, these tanning products can safely provide natural-looking color (not the orange tinge of products past) without the risks of UV radiation.
Sunless tanning products are hot sellers despite the push of some fashionistas, like Simon Doonan, creative director of Barneys New York, who insists that the bronzed look “is very ’80s porno star, unhealthy and kind of sleazy.” In the current issue of The Skin Cancer Foundation Journal, Doonan cites examples like Tilda Swinton, Michelle Obama and Lucy Liu to show that what is now in fashion is “healthy, natural glowing skin” — the “color you were born with.”
Still, a summer tan seems to be coveted by many Westerners, whose values spread easily to others. Despite the traditionally prized porcelain skin of Asian cultures, in a survey of 546 Asian Americans published last month in The Archives of Dermatology, Emily Gorell and colleagues at Stanford University School of Medicine found that the more westernized the respondents, the more positive their attitudes toward tanning and sunbathing, and the more negative toward the use of sun protection.
And according to a 2006 report in Pediatrics, only minimal progress has been made in persuading American teenagers to adopt sun-protective behaviors.
In two nationally representative surveys, conducted in 1998 and 2004, Vilma Cokkinides, an epidemiologist at the American Cancer Society, and colleagues found that in both years, about 70 percent of teenagers reported having been sunburned during the summer. There was a significant decrease in sunburns among younger teenagers and an overall increase (to 39 percent from 31 percent) in those who said they regularly used sunscreen. But there was little change in time spent outdoors during the peak sun hours of 10am to 4pm and an increase in days spent at the beach.
In the 2004 survey, only one in three teenagers reported using sunglasses, one in 20 said they wore wide-brimmed hats, and two-thirds agreed or strongly agreed with the statement, “I look better when I have a tan.”
ADDING COLOR WITHOUT SUN
Those seeking a safe tan have a choice of products called sunless tanners and bronzers, including daily moisturizers, brush-on powders and sprays that gradually add a tan to the skin that washes off over time. These products use a color additive — a colorless sugar called dihydroxyacetone, or DHA — that darkens the skin by reacting with amino acids in the dead cells on the skin surface. The sun, in contrast, affects the deepest layers of the skin.
It is important to note that most of these products do not contain sunscreen ingredients and will not protect you from harmful UV radiation. Nor will the resulting tan protect you. You still will need to use sunscreen with an SPF value of 15 or higher (preferably 30 or higher in the summer). The most effective products contain a micronized form of titanium dioxide, which provides excellent protection without leaving you white as a ghost.
Tanning products that lack sunscreen must contain a warning on the label; consider it a word to the wise: “This product does not contain a sunscreen and does not protect against sunburn. Repeated exposure of unprotected skin while tanning may increase the risk of skin aging, skin cancer and other harmful effects to the skin even if you do not burn.”
In choosing a product, pay attention to the shade. If you are light-skinned, look for products marked for light to medium skin tones. Those marked dark work best on people with naturally darker complexions who tan easily.
If you use a spray-on sunless tanner, be sure to follow the package directions. Keep the spray away from your eyes, mouth and mucous membranes. The risks of inhaling or ingesting DHA are not known.
To avoid uneven color, first wash with a soapy washcloth to remove dead cells that are ready to flake off. You may also apply a moisturizer to your skin before spraying. Apply very little of the product to dry-skin areas like knees and elbows, which take up more of the color. And be sure to wash your hands before touching your eyes.
Dead skin cells are sloughed off or worn off every day, and your entire epidermis is replaced every 35 to 45 days. In most cases, the color from sunless tanners is gone within a week. So most products require reapplication about once every three days to maintain the color.
The US Food and Drug Administration warns against the use of tanning pills. These contain large amounts of a color additive called canthazanthin, which can settle in various parts of the body and damage the retina of the eye. The pills can also cause nausea, cramps and diarrhea.
The Skin Cancer Foundation has produced many helpful brochures, which can be ordered through its Web store, www.skincancer.org.
Benjamin Chen (陳昱安) didn’t know how intense a hackathon could be. “You literally work non-stop. You don’t eat breakfast, you don’t eat lunch because you really need to finish the product,” the 10th-grader from Taipei American School says. “You feel the adrenaline rushing… It’s refreshing, I was like a new person.” Chen became fascinated by these round-the-clock competitions to create technology or software products, and participated in 10 more before he decided to start one that focused on his twin passions of economics and technology. He says there are many hackathons that delve into social and environmental issues, but few have
The town of Baolai (寶來) is located along the Southern Cross-Island Highway in the upper reaches of Kaohsiung City. After suffering a devastating setback at the hands of Typhoon Morakot, the town’s tourism industry is finally showing signs of recovery. While the town itself has many commercial hot spring offerings for tourists, the adjacent Baolai River also has at least five different wild hot springs available to those with a more adventurous spirit. SHIDONG AND WUKENG Just before entering the town of Baolai, make two right turns to reach the bridge across the Baolai River. Immediately after crossing this bridge, there is
Jan. 25 to Jan. 30 It was the beginning of the end when Dutch sergeant Hans Jurgen Radis walked out of Fort Zeelandia and surrendered to the besieging army of Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga). The Dutch had already been trapped in the fort for nine months, and they were sick, hungry and in despair. After one defection during the early days of the siege, Dutch commander Frederick Coyett set up checkpoints around the fort’s perimeter, in what is today’s Tainan. Radis told his bunkmate he was going hunting, but by the time they realized where
In October of 2002 the James Ossuary exploded into the public consciousness. The artifact, a burial box in which bones were interred, was announced at a press conference in Washington prior to undergoing any form of scholarly authentication. It had an inscription that read in Aramaic: Ya’akov bar Yosef akhui di Yeshua (“James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus”). Its promoters presented the thing as the first real concrete link to the historical Jesus. It was an obvious fake, and at that time I was administrating two enormous discussion groups devoted to early Christian history, which hosted numerous scholars in