VIEW THIS PAGE Following in the footsteps of Kirsten Dunst, who managed to turn the fall of the house of Bourbon into a teenage coming-of-age romp in Marie Antoinette (2006), albeit one that ended in a beheading, Keira Knightly has stepped up to the block by taking on the role of Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, the lady of another great house who had a less than delightful time in her marriage. Unfortunately, it also means a less than delightful time in the cinema, despite all the splendid clothes and long, lingering shots of the sumptuous interiors of great Georgian houses.
Georgiana, after her marriage to the peculiar William Cavendish, 5th Duke of Devonshire, became known for her advanced social views and unconventional domestic arrangements. She was one of those grand hostesses of Georgian England who played a significant behind the scenes role in greasing
the wheels of political and social intercourse.
Unfortunately, the director Saul Dibb seems utterly unable, or at least unwilling, to go beyond the topic of sexual intercourse. There was also a good deal of that going on as well in the second half of the 18th century, both inside and outside the facade of respectable marriages, but the fact that a marriage into the immense wealth and political power of the Cavendish family was motivated not by love but by political and financial considerations, seems to outrage the director.
Is Dibb trying to draw parallels with another unhappy marriage that was dealt with
in The Queen (2006), an infinitely superior film. Georgiana was a member of the Spencer family, as was the late Diana, Princess of Wales, and was also much loved, though not by her husband.
Knightly is perfectly competent in the role of Georgiana. She showed some talent in the period drama Pride and Prejudice (2005) — before losing herself in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise — but in The Duchess she is not given adequate tools to work with, and to a large extent ends up a mere clotheshorse. Make no mistake, this is a sumptuous production and the outfits are really splendid. The one actually erotic scene, not surprisingly, focuses more on clothes than on bodies.
Apart from a few throwaway lines intended to suggest Georgiana’s interest in the world around her and canny intellect in interpreting what she sees, the qualities that made her a force in society are never revealed. And even in the gentlemen around her, one gets almost nothing other than doe-eyed indignation at thwarted love by characters such as Charles Grey (Dominic Cooper), one
of the most forceful politicians of his age, and vaguely flirtatious behavior from Charles James Fox (Simon McBurney), another formidable member of the political elite. These peripheral figures are relegated to nothing more than a bewigged backdrop for Georgiana’s victimization at the hands of an abominable husband, who goes so far as to make a mistress of his wife’s best friend, and who expected the two women to live amicably under the same roof. It is something that the historical duke in fact achieved, but The Duchess gives us little insight into the social context in which such an arrangement could be realized.
The production is given some backbone by Ralph Fiennes as the Duke, who as one of the most powerful and richest peers in England had little need to concern himself with the opinion of others. His utter weirdness is remarkably convincing, as are the attitudes of Charlotte Rampling as Georgiana’s mother. Their efforts lift The Duchess slightly, but ultimately the director’s belief that a second rate romance dressed up in crinolines makes a historical drama is the production’s undoing. If you like gorgeous clothes, spectacular hats and resplendent architecture, there is plenty to enjoy in this film, but don’t expect much more.VIEW THIS PAGE
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless