What is the difference between Mozart and Elton John? Of the many possible answers, the one that interests historian Tim Blanning is the gulf in their social status during their respective lifetimes. Mozart, a hired hand of the archbishop of Salzburg, was seated with the valets and cooks at dinner. Elton, on the other hand, is hugely rich and hobnobs with the royal family. The process by which musicians climbed the respectability ladder — from servants to superstars — is the subject of this fascinating book.
At first, patronage meant exclusivity, harshly enforced if necessary. Bach was slung in jail for trying to leave the
employment of the duke of Weimar in 1717. Haydn’s contract with his master, Prince Esterhazy, determined that he would “be under permanent obligation to compose such pieces of music as his Serene Princely Highness may command, and neither to communicate such new compositions to anyone, nor to allow them to be copied, … nor shall he compose for any other person without the knowledge and gracious
permission of his Highness.”
When Esterhazy died, Haydn moved to London, just as “a massive expansion of music printing and publishing” was under way. Handel was an encouraging model, having become what Blanning calls “the first composer and musical impresario who made a fortune from a paying public.” But Haydn’s new freedom also had artistic consequences. The financial drain of full-time salaries for the musicians in Esterhazy’s exclusive employ had meant that Haydn composed symphonies for only 14 players. In London, there was a “much larger pool of professional musicians who could be hired by the season or even by the concert,” and so he began to write for orchestras of 50 or 60.
On the other hand, there was a new necessity to please a paying public, which contrasted in Haydn’s mind with his previous freedom to be “original.” Such ambivalence towards the multiple and often fickle paymasters that composers faced is a recurring theme. Once the musician has evolved from salaried artisan to expressive Romantic genius, thanks to the examples of Beethoven, Paganini, Rossini and perhaps especially Liszt (who also benefited, Blanning points out, from the new art of lithography, which could disseminate his good looks far and wide), he is increasingly tempted to think of those who do not understand
the latest extrusion of his genius as “philistines.”
Blanning also traces the material developments that helped spread the influence of music and its practitioners. He observes the changes in musical architecture, from the first dedicated concert houses to the opulence of the Paris Opera (designed mainly around the huge staircase where the rich could show off their jewels and furs), which is contrasted with the austerity of Wagner’s Bayreuth. (There is a beautiful interpolation here on John Coltrane’s A Love Supreme, which Blanning relates persuasively to the apotheosis of Wagnerian Romanticism in Parsifal.) On we hurry, to London music halls in the 19th century and then cinemas, with their Wurlitzer organs on which snatches of Wagner could be played to accompany a cavalry charge in a western.
Technology, of course, has an important place in the story, evoked in the euphonious chapter title From Stradivarius to Stratocaster. Before the advent of recording, the single most important technological innovation was probably the invention of the piano, which reproduced in middle-class homes like a virus. Also important was the invention of valves for brass instruments, as Blanning amusingly notes: “As anyone who has had the misfortune to be drafted into a military band of bugles will know, although it is easy to extract a sound from a mouthpiece attached to a coil of brass ending in a bell shape, making that sound euphonious is a different matter.”
Acknowledging, too, Adolphe Sax’s saxophones, Blanning moves on to gramophones, jukeboxes and Leo Fender’s solid-body electric guitar: the Broadcaster, quickly renamed the Telecaster. “Anyone aspiring to emulate the popular music of the swing era needed a high degree of musical training and very expensive instruments,” Blanning writes. “In the post-Fender era, a group could be assembled for little money and less expertise: three chords and they were in business.”
In a late chapter on “liberation,” he explores music’s relationship with nationalism (La Marseillaise, Rule Britannia, Smetana’s musical Bohemia, the Eurovision song contest), its place in the US civil rights movement and the fact that famous musicians quite often have a lot of sex. In a way, the theme of the book is now reversed: for most of the time, it has been an argument about the external factors that helped music’s rise to dominance; here Blanning is instead discussing what music did for other realms, and his claims can be rather ambitious (one may doubt that the faux-gay girls of Russian pop group t.A.T.u. really advanced “the acceptability of lesbianism” in any serious way).
When Blanning reaches his conclusion, his subtle cultural demonstration of how music triumphed modulates, slightly unnervingly, into triumphalism, as he attempts to demonstrate that music now is superior to all other art forms, which are apparently in decline. Literature? Forget about it: “The gap between Charles Dickens and, say, Martin Amis is better described as a chasm.” (Don’t say Martin Amis, in that case.) Cinema? Well, “music can exist without the moving image, but the moving image cannot exist without music.” Tell it to the Coen brothers, who used no music in the sound track to No Country for Old Men.
This is an unnecessarily combative finale to a very fine book. Blanning says, after all, that he does not intend to defend the quality of all the vast quantities of music in which the modern world is soaked, but simply to explain the form’s cultural pre-eminence. In the same way, music as a whole does not need the sort of crabby defense offered it here, in which other media are casually denigrated by means of loaded historical comparisons. Prince is not engaged in a contest with Don DeLillo; J.M. Coetzee is not looking over his shoulder at John Tavener. Music is not in competition with other art forms. If it is true that the other arts constantly aspire to its condition, music need take no heed.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su