[ART JOURNAL] An exhibit fit for a master

VIEW THIS PAGE

Few masters in the history of modern Taiwanese art underwent the kind of dramatic aesthetic transformation experienced by Chu Teh-chun (朱德群). The stages of this transformation provide the framework for a retrospective that features more than 100 of his canvases, calligraphy and ink paintings and is currently on view at Taipei’s National Museum of History (國立歷史博物館).

The museum and the exhibit’s curators should be commended for producing one of the year’s most outstanding shows. From the arrangement of the paintings — mainly chronological but, somewhat mischievously, here and there disrupting the timeline so as to show contrast with his different artistic periods — to the explanation of the works themselves, the exhibit admirably reveals why Chu, 88, is regarded as one of Taiwan’s preeminent masters of abstract expressionism.

Chu’s early representational paintings of Taiwan’s rugged mountains and the expansive horizontal lines of its coasts greet viewers as they enter the exhibit. These seven formative canvases, which use broad brushstrokes and a liberal application of paint to capture the stark beauty and vibrant color of Taiwan’s natural scenery, are placed here as much as a testament to his early work as to show the remarkable contrast between these realistic landscapes and what was to come later.

Had Chu remained in Taiwan, he would probably be known as a proficient chronicler of Taiwan’s natural scenery, as these relatively small canvases show a painter in love with the graphic depiction of landscapes and seascapes, in works that are reminiscent of the style popularized by Canada’s Group of Seven.

The popularity of his first Taiwan solo exhibition in the early 1950s, however, convinced Chu to leave the island and further his studies in France. He never looked back, both in terms of where he chose to reside and his style of painting. The traditions of Chinese calligraphy and a love of landscapes that informed these earlier works, however, have remained constants throughout his long career.

As with many artists, a date can be assigned for when Chu had an epiphany that would change his style. In 1956 he visited a retrospective for abstract artist Nicolas de Stael at a museum in Paris and promptly abandoned representational painting. The geometric slabs of impasto color, which are hallmarks of De Stael’s abstract paintings, soon began to influence Chu’s work.

In one of the exhibit’s more ingenious flourishes, Fantasia (幻想曲), a post-Taiwan work done in 1958, and Seascape (海景), completed in 1954 just before Chu moved to France, are placed side-by-side. Rather than separating the two pictures or offering commentary, the museum allows the viewer to contemplate the differences between the layered color and horizontal brushstrokes of the latter and the sparse pigment and conservative use of oil with black vertical lines in the former.

Although De Stael remained a formative influence, it is clear during this early French period that Chu was also experimenting with a tradition outside the Western canon. The addition of stark black lines is evidence that Chinese calligraphy was becoming an important part of his visual vocabulary.

Another noticeable difference between these two works — differences that become more apparent with time — is the size of the canvas. Small canvases using copious amounts of paint mark Chu’s Taiwan period, which one museum official attributed to Chu’s poverty. Perhaps, but it also seems that the increasingly larger canvases are a hint that Chu was becoming more confident as an artist.