With many electronics manufacturers around the world once again playing catch-up to Apple’s innovations, it is no surprise that Nokia has announced its first touch-screen mobile, which is more than a little similar to Apple’s iPhone.
“If there is something good in the world, then we copy with pride,” Anssi Vanjoki, Nokia’s Executive Vice President, said when asked about similarities between the new Nokia 5800 XpressMusic and the iPhone. While the words “iPhone clone” are now being used to describe almost anything with a touch screen, the new 5800 has certainly been inspired by the iPhone. Nokia, which previously was openly against touch-screen products, has now changed direction and after 18 months finally responded with its first ever touch-screen handset, the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic.
However, the Nokia 5800 is certainly not directly aimed at the iPhone market. It costs a fraction of the price of an iPhone, offers many different features and ships with a huge built-in collection of music. Quite clearly Apple has started a trend and this is only just the beginning of Nokia’s attempt at winning some of the market. Their future touch-screen products within the N-series range of phones are more likely to be direct competitors to the iPhone in terms of price and hardware.
Ironically, it is not the hardware as such that competes with Apple’s business model — Nokia doesn’t yet need to worry about Apple’s tiny bite into the mobile market; what concerns the company more seems to be the iTunes Store.
Apple’s iTunes Store currently holds around 90 percent of the digital music market, which represents more than 5 billion songs sold worldwide to date. Nokia’s new “Comes With Music” contract, launched in London last week, is clearly what threatens Apple the most, since it allows users to download as much music as they like for free within a 12-month period — provided they purchase the new 5800 handset from Nokia, which was priced at US$230 at its recent UK release. Apple will undoubtedly suffer from this new package since people will be able to download their tunes for free, rather than being forced to use the iTunes store or resort illegal downloads. Indeed, this is the first initiative in the world that has the potential to compete with music piracy. Illegal music downloading represents 15 percent of the market, according to Nokia’s UK managing director Simon Ainslie, who said, “It is better for music companies to receive something for their music than nothing.” With piracy laws becoming more militantly enforced in many countries, illegal music downloaders are bound to feel somewhat drawn to a package that essentially allows legal piracy for the price of an inexpensive, iPhone-like handset.
So what is the 5800 actually like in comparison to the now iconic iPhone? The most major difference is the way the touch screen works. The 5800 allows only one finger to be used when touching the screen, meaning none of the more human gestures of the iPhone are present. This includes things like “pinching” an image with two fingers in order to zoom in or out. Immediately Apple will be rubbing its hands at this inferior touch screen, which is presumably because the 5800 is a budget phone with a competing contract designed to go head-to-head with iTunes rather than the iPhone itself. Perhaps only time will tell, but this one-handed design could make the phone less cumbersome than the iPhone, which often requires two-handed operation. However, if Nokia truly intends to encroach on the iPhone market, then it is surely planning a multi-finger touch screen for the future.
Of course, Nokia’s legacy allows it a step-up on Apple immediately, as its core expertise has long been in creating mobile phones and doing it well. The 5800 includes a superior camera with a Carl Zeiss lens, 3x digital zoom, autofocus, dual-LED flash and the ability to record video at 640x480 resolution with 30 frames per second. It also has a secondary camera for video conferencing. Comparatively, the iPhone is quite weak on the camera front with no Carl Zeiss lens, no digital zoom, no autofocus, no flash and no recording of video or video conferencing.
The 5800 also boasts other features that are lacking on the iPhone: voice recognition; the ability to send MMS picture messages; file sharing via bluetooth; and a replaceable battery. Some of this can be rationalized: a flash can drain the battery faster; digital zoom is essentially a gimmick; video conferencing is rarely used and requires a second camera; voice recognition is not commonly used; and MMS can be achieved using e-mail instead. Some other omissions, though, are quite unforgivable — no built-in video recording is an amazing elision, especially with the iPhone’s link to YouTube, which contains millions of cellphone-submitted videos. Imagine the frustration of having an iPhone on you when you see something that just needs to be recorded for YouTube! This could be one reason why people may prefer the 5800. Also, the iPhone has no ability to send SMS text messaging to multiple contacts, which is a bizarre oversight. The lack of Adobe Flash support on iPhone also makes no sense and reduces the usability of YouTube dramatically since iPhone users are restricted to YouTube videos encoded in H.264 format.
Although Apple’s iPhone and the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic are comparable, at least on first glance, Nokia’s answer appears to be a much less expensive and more feature-rich handset — and it comes with a sublime package if you are a music lover. The iPhone, however, has a more advanced touch screen and of course the beauty that comes with a product designed by Apple. It is worth remembering also that many of the iPhone’s flaws can be removed by purchasing software from Apple’s App Store.
— Gareth Murfin is a freelance developer and consultant
(www.garethmurfin.co.uk)
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless