Christine Stuart, a communications professor at Pennsylvania State University (Penn State), stood at the chalkboard and taught her students strategies for mingling at their forthcoming class party.
"Don't monopolize," she said cheerfully. "You need to get around the room." She listed the three easiest forms of conversation - cliches, facts and opinions - on the board and urged students to make index cards with opening lines for starting conversations: "Gee, this sangria is great, don't you think?" or "Sure is humid today."
Although one student let out a little snort when asked to think of every conversation as having an "intro," "body" and "conclusion," most of the class quietly wrote down everything on the board.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
When Stuart asked a question, she got, at best, monosyllabic answers uttered at low pitch. The nervous tension in the room seemed tangible as students handed in their homework, a detailed list of their personal goals for the semester: talk to a stranger, go to professors' office hours, sound more confident on the phone, offer three opinions in class, greet an authority figure, learn to enter conversations.
"Sometimes I'm like, 'Wait, how old are we?'" said Elena Kashkan, a sophomore, after class. She had avoided seminars her first year, opting instead for large lectures where she would never have to speak. "I need to learn to care less about what other people think of me," she said. "It's not like I want to be that quiet girl in the corner."
Although the class, Speech Anxiety, sometimes resembles therapy, it serves a practical purpose: helping students graduate. Penn State's first "reticence course," taught in 1965, consisted of 16 students who were going to drop out rather than take the university's required speaking course. Today, there are three courses a semester with some 20 students each, and more than a dozen other institutions have adopted or designed similar programs.
Because speaking well is often crucial to getting a job - and to sounding educated - nearly half of American colleges and universities require a public speaking or communications course, according to the National Communication Association. Even universities without a requirement have put more emphasis on speaking in class, developing courses labeled "speaking intensive" in departments not associated with class participation.
A CRUCIAL SKILL
Speech Anxiety, which fulfills Penn State's requirement, allows undergraduates to ease their way into public speaking, first in groups, then in front of the professor and finally in front of the class; on rare occasions, students can bring friends to stand next to them for support. To be admitted to the course, students must demonstrate in an interview the extent of their reticence, defined as "chronic silence due to a fear of foolishness." If they waltz into the interview, hold out their hand, smile and introduce themselves, they're usually deemed not right for the course.
Some students are simply shy or experience stage fright; others are paralyzed in social situations. In extreme cases, an instructor might suggest a visit to university health services. Communications professors are not equipped to provide counseling, and they make an effort to avoid talking about their students' feelings. They don't try to identify the root of a student's anxiety. Instead, they focus almost exclusively on behavior.
"These are the quietest classes you'll ever be in," says Beau Bingham, an assistant lecturer at the University of Wyoming. The reticence course he teaches, which covers social conversations, group discussions and public speaking, began seven years ago because of concerns students would drop out.
"There's a whole population of students out there who go through their college career and don't get their degree because they can't bear to take public speaking," he says. He lets people into the class based on their scores on the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension, a widely administered test that asks students to rate their identification with statements like "Ordinarily I am very tense and nervous in conversations" or "While giving a speech, I get so nervous I forget facts I really know."
CALMING TECHNIQUES
Some campuses hold speech labs to teach calming techniques, like deep breathing, positive visualization and systematic desensitization. In the last five years, more than 20 campuses, including Hamilton College, Randolph-Macon College and Arizona State University, have opened labs where students practice speaking and receive individualized feedback.
"I've had students stop speeches halfway through because they're sobbing or vomiting," says Meg McConnaughy, director of the Communication Assessment and Learning Lab at Arizona State University. "If you're too scared to speak, you're not going to get your ideas across, and that's an absolute tragedy."
McConnaughy and others in the field maintain that speaking anxiety can be as debilitating as any formally recognized learning disorder. According to research published in the academic journal Communication Quarterly, the average college GPA of students with communication apprehension is a half-point lower than that of students without it.
NO ONE IS PERFECT
In Speaking Confidently, a class for reticent students at the University of Nebraska, Omaha, classmates look one another in the eye before speeches and repeat scripted positive statements: "No one is perfect or fully competent in all aspects of life," "They can't feel my heart beat," "I can be myself."
Some experts question whether it's really possible, or necessary, to ease the anxiety of highly apprehensive speakers. A new branch of thinking, called communibiology, argues that the problem is one of nature, not nurture. "For most people, there is no solution," says James McCroskey, a professor at the University of Alabama, Birmingham. "Except maybe for gene replacement," he adds with a laugh.
A leading scholar in the study of communication apprehension, he says forcing students to talk in public can be counterproductive. His research, he adds, shows that students nervous about speaking learn less if they anticipate having to communicate in class. Rather than paying attention, they fret about whether they'll be called on and what they will say.
John Daly, a professor at the University of Texas, Austin, teaches a 500-student lecture class on interpersonal communication. He says the benefits of talking in class are overstated. "There's a theory in this culture that class participation is the way to learn, and I don't know if I buy that completely," he says. "Unless you can make a really strong argument that the ability to talk about the topic is vital to understanding, you're doing this population of students a real disservice, causing them incredible discomfort."
And yet, students clamor to get into the reticence courses - this year, Penn State had to close interviews two days early because all openings were filled - and many describe the class as a turning point in their time at college.
"It was much easier to learn to talk when I was in a big room of people who had my problem," says Nathan Belanger, a junior at Penn State. He used to lose track of his thoughts, fall silent for periods of time and contemplate giving up and walking out of the classroom. He says his grades have improved.
"Not being able to voice my own opinions really hurt," he says. "I never figured out what I'm so afraid of. I'm just relieved I found a way to get around whatever it is."
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
The following three paragraphs are just some of what the local Chinese-language press is reporting on breathlessly and following every twist and turn with the eagerness of a soap opera fan. For many English-language readers, it probably comes across as incomprehensibly opaque, so bear with me briefly dear reader: To the surprise of many, former pop singer and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) ex-lawmaker Yu Tien (余天) of the Taiwan Normal Country Promotion Association (TNCPA) at the last minute dropped out of the running for committee chair of the DPP’s New Taipei City chapter, paving the way for DPP legislator Su
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist