Tue, Sep 11, 2007 - Page 16 News List

Risks and ethics trouble living organ donors

As the number of organ donations directed to strangers increases, so do ethical concerns

By JANE E BRODYNY  /  Times News Service , New York

The possibilities include personality or emotional disturbances like depression, low self-esteem, an abnormal desire for attention or a desire to become involved in the recipient's life. Or the person may simply want to repay a kindness to society, perhaps because a loved one's life was saved by an organ from a deceased donor.

But when the motive is suspect, transplant teams are supposed to assess the reasons and prohibit donations that raise serious concerns.

HELPING STRANGERS

Recently, there has been an increase in organ donations directed to strangers who may advertise their need for transplants through the news media, the Internet and even on billboards. Although there is nothing illegal about soliciting a donor organ, the practice is inherently unfair and raises the possibility of buying and selling organs, which the medical community considers highly unethical. Donated organs are considered a "gift of life," not a commodity to be bought and sold.

There is a national list of people awaiting transplants, and those who are the sickest, though rarely the wealthiest, are at the top. But when donations are directed to strangers, potential recipients "who have the most compelling stories and the means to advertise their plight tend to be the ones who get the organs, rather than those most in need," said Truog.

There are other possible wrinkles in donations directed to strangers. The donor may insist that the donation not go to a recipient of a particular race, religion or ethnic group. One case, in which a white brain-dead donor had specified that his organs go just to white recipients, prompted Florida to pass a law prohibiting patients and families from restricting donations in this way.

Another case was less clear-cut. A Jewish man in New York learned of a Jewish child in Los Angeles who needed a kidney and said he would donate a kidney to help this child. This is clearly a discriminatory donation, even though it would enable those below the child on the transplant list to move up a notch. On the other hand, if the donation was not allowed, no one would benefit, because the man would not offer his kidney to anyone else.

DONOR SWAPS

Pressure is mounting to establish a national registry of live donors, people who were willing to donate organs to relatives or friends but were not good matches.

Through such a registry, patients anywhere in the country could "swap" one of their donors who is not a match for a donor who is. Such programs have the potential to increase significantly the donor pool and the success of transplants, because the surgery can be done before the patient is deathly ill. In recent years, small donor exchange programs have been established by the Johns Hopkins Medical Center, the New England Organ Bank and the Ohio Paired Donation Consortium.

This story has been viewed 1723 times.
TOP top