Over the next three months, the Lebanese artist Rabih Mroue will stage his new performance piece in Paris, Rome and the capitals of Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt. But he will not present it here, for the audience with whom it might resonate most.
This week, an Interior Ministry censorship board banned performances of the piece, How Nancy Wished That Everything Was an April Fool's Joke, which was to have received its premiere this weekend.
For Mroue, the outright ban is a first. And he says it bodes ill for an art scene that gestated during a period of precarious peace but is now squeezed by the government's fear of renewed civil war.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
"The margin of freedom is getting smaller and smaller," he said during a break from his day job as an illustrator for a Lebanese television station. "The vision is becoming so narrow, and there is no more room for different voices."
Written by Mroue with Fadi Toufic, Nancy presents an episodic history of Lebanon's 15-year civil war through the experiences of four fighters who served in different militias. For the duration of the performance, Mroue; his wife, Lina Saneh; and two other actors sit on a couch meant for three. Above each actor's head, like speech balloons in a comic strip, are a microphone and a screen projecting posters of the "martyrs" and militias that are common to this day on the streets of Beirut.
The four characters tell stories of contradiction that ricochet off one another. They will adhere to an ideological position and then change it. They pledge loyalty to a political leader and then betray him. They make allies and then forsake them. They switch sides and get lost.
In each story they tell they are killed in battle, only to come back to life again in the next round, like irrepressible players of video games.
The various and competing narratives weave a dense web that gives a sense of how conflicts play out over the years in any city - Beirut, Baghdad, Sarajevo, Belfast - riven by sectarian strife.
Mroue, 40, belongs to a tight-knit generation of artists, writers and filmmakers that has put Beirut back on the cultural map since the end of the civil war in 1990. They have learned to maneuver on the margins of mainstream society, striving to create works of formal precision and political insight with as little interference as possible from Lebanon's fragile, divided government.
But that space is indeed shrinking. Since the late 1990s, Mroue had eluded the censors by ignoring them. He didn't bother to clear his scripts. The price, he said, was that he could perform each piece for a few nights only, he could not accept a fee, and he relied on art spaces that are slightly off the radar.
But after he staged Who's Afraid of Representation - a piece incorporating the true story of a civil servant who killed some of his colleagues when he was fired from his job - in late 2005, officials from Lebanon's Interior Ministry called him in and demanded that he eliminate portions of the performance.
Since then, performance spaces have been reluctant to stage anything without previous approval from the censorship board. So this summer Mroue decided to take his chances with the censors.
After a weeklong struggle with Mroue over parts of the script, the censorship board banned the performance Aug. 14.
"I expected to have to cut from the text," Mroue said. "But I didn't expect it to be stopped in such a violent way."
He appealed the decision and was rebuffed. The censors would not provide an explanation. When he started receiving offers of political cover from various factions, he said, he knew that the fight he had on his hands was no longer his own, and that the performance risked being used anyway.
How Nancy Wished That Everything Was an April Fool's Joke was to have been presented on Saturday at Art Lounge, a fashionably disheveled gallery that doubles as a bar and boutique on the outskirts of the city in the drab Karantina industrial district.
Reached by telephone, the owner of the space, Nino Azzi, said he was relieved. "It's better to sort out all the legalities in advance," he said. "It's a bit delicate right now."
A year after fighting between Israeli troops and Hezbollah in Lebanon, the country remains on tenterhooks. The lingering specter of the long civil war is reinforced by a standoff between pro-government and opposition parties, and by continued fighting between the Lebanese army and Islamists in the north.
Mroue and his contemporaries were once considered part of a postwar generation, but they have not entirely escaped Lebanon's cyclical violence. Mroue is more aware of that than most.
"We know we are in the midst of a cold civil war," he said. "There may be no fighting, but we know the fighters are there. Even the younger generation is ready to fight."
Born in Beirut in 1967, Mroue studied theater at the Lebanese University, where he met Saneh, his wife and frequent collaborator.
When they were in their early 20s, the couple created a stage adaptation of The Journey of Little Gandhi, a novel by the Lebanese writer Elias Khoury. Since then they have collaborated formally and informally on an ever more multidisciplinary body of work that includes videos and installations combining photography, text and sculpture.
Yet theater remains the spine of their art. Few of the theater directors who were active in the 1980s are staging plays in Beirut now. Mroue and Saneh have helped sustain Lebanese theater by pushing it into the realm of performance art.
With a string of formally inventive, astringent performance pieces to their credit, they are to Beirut what the Wooster Group is to New York: a blend of avant-garde innovation, conceptual complexity and political urgency, all grounded in earthy humor.
"Rabih is a thinker," said Walid Raad, one of Lebanon's best-known artists. "There are concepts, plays, figures, texts and forms - and Rabih has something to say to, and about, them. At the same time, it always seems as if his dialogue is in the service of the present and future, in Lebanon and elsewhere."
In Mroue's view, a Beirut audience would have implicitly understood the genesis of his latest piece. "It came out of a real fear of another civil war," he said.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless