Watching the designer Randolph Duke as a commentator for ABC describing what a wonderful impact dressing an Oscar-nominated actress for the red carpet has on a designer's career, it was hard not to wonder how he ended up so far on the wrong side of the velvet rope, speaking from a perch so distant it had to be called the Fashion Skyway.
You could imagine Sally Kirkland running him over in the skyway's HOV lane with her loopy butterfly getup — she called it "a rabbi and a reverend" — that she claimed was made by her cabala teacher.
If this is what designers have to look forward to, it may be the year to re-evaluate whether their rumored deals to dress actresses are really worth all that money, what with Giorgio Armani, who put on an extravagant fashion show in Beverly Hills the night before, among the celebrities making the rounds on the red carpet this year.
PHOTOS: AGENCIES
Like a good number of the Oscars that were considered locked up weeks before the event, the generally frumpy, overly beaded fashion picks offered such a diminishing return of suspense or variety that the event could have been mistaken for a repeat.
Penelope Cruz made her entrance in a pale pink bustier gown by Versace with a full skirt of tiered ruffles dragging behind her that was almost a duplicate of the pale blue Dior dress Charlize Theron wore two years ago.
Then Nicole Kidman turned up in a red halter dress tied up with a gift-wrapping bow at the neck so enormous that one could not help but think of Theron's big-bow Dior dress from last year. Theron, annually drubbed by the fashion police, should be entitled to some retroactive style points for instigating a theme of holiday dressing. And the knockoff artists will be thrilled, as Duke pointed out.
There was also a clear trend of gaudy jewelry built into the dresses, beginning with Jennifer Lopez, caged in five chains of metallic rhinestones on top of her ruched empire-waist Marchesa gown, and followed by Rachel Weisz in a gold Vera Wang dress. As if the crystal bow at its bodice and the crystal tiers sewn into the hem of its train were not sparkling enough, Weisz added what looked like a Christmas ornament from Cartier around her neck.
"I don't know where to look," Duke cried.
Cate Blanchett, duly ornamented, was among the nominees who attended Armani's fashion show on Saturday, when she indicated she would wear a dress by the designer to the awards, as she did. She wore a silver one-shoulder mesh gown, overlaid with a veil of flowers made of jet black paillettes; her hair up, she was basically the picture of prepackaged elegance, though she said she is not an actress who concerns herself with the opinions of fashion critics.
“I think the fashion has probably gotten a lot safer,” Blanchett said. “But if you are dressing to impress other people, then I think you're going to get in trouble.”
What else could explain the endless chain of strapless dresses this awards season in Hollywood that have made actresses, once they are all seated, look practically naked? I would concede that Jada Pinkett Smith in a gold Carolina Herrera strapless dress looked sublime, and Reese Witherspoon's layered black dress by Olivier Theyskens of Nina Ricci should sufficiently broadcast the designer's name to the far reaches of the planet before he has even had his first fashion show for the French house. (Until last season Theyskens was the designer of Rochas.)
The Oscars offered some respite to the strapless trend, though, in a few shapes that were interesting without being potentially offensive to mainstream tastes. Gwyneth Paltrow, for example, wore a pink Zac Posen dress with articulated seams that stretched across her torso like a spider web, and Maggie Gyllenhaal's black and blue Proenza Schouler gown, tipped in hundreds of black feathers at the hem, was held up by a strap that slashed provocatively across her shoulder. You could imagine any of these designers having a bright future in television.
But it seems that no matter how many stylists and designers become involved in the process, something goes haywire.
Perhaps the biggest surprise leading up to the awards was the attention lavished on the supporting actress nominee Jennifer Hudson, who proudly wears a size 12, by a roster of international designers who do not usually offer such sizes in their stores.
Hudson, taken under the wing of Andre Leon Talley, the editor at large of Vogue, had her choice of dresses and selected a brown ruched one by Oscar de la Renta. The dress cleverly had hidden pockets, so Hudson, who was visibly nervous, could hide her hands when she was talking on television and, most thankfully, spare the audience another remark from a celebrity about wearing a dress so that people could not see her knees shake. Seriously, do Celine Dion and Jessica Biel share a publicist?
It was a shame, then, that Hudson topped the look with a metallic python bolero jacket that seemed designed to protect her from the prying ears of invading space aliens.
Meryl Streep, too, has already taken heat last night for the papery black silk radzimire coat she covered with a hodgepodge of dancing coral and turquoise jewelry, but the broadcasters neglected to mention that Streep, one of the few actresses who refuses to hire a stylist, was in on the joke. Nominated for her role as the icy fashion editor in The Devil Wears Prada, Streep did, indeed, wear Prada.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless