Edward Said published his highly influential polemic Orientalism nearly 30 years ago, and Robert Irwin, a British specialist in the history and culture of the Middle East, has been fuming ever since. Dangerous Knowledge is his belated two-pronged response: a point-by-point rebuttal of Said, folded into a history of Western scholarship devoted to the Middle East.
Irwin delays his direct attack until the penultimate chapter but throws down the gauntlet early. Orientalism, which indicts the entire field of Eastern studies as racist and imperialist, he characterizes in the introduction as "a work of malignant charlatanry."
Its distortions are so funda-mental, its omissions so glaring, that the first order of business, as Irwin sees it, is to offer a dispassionate account of what Western scholars did and did not do. The exercise is worthwhile, he argues, because Said's book "has been surprisingly effective in discrediting and demoralizing an entire tradition of scholarship."
A survey course in West-East encounters follows, beginning with the scattered observations of the ancient Greeks and Romans, and the first attempts by Christian thinkers to make sense of Islam, a religion they interpreted as a new form of Christian heresy. Irwin points out that throughout the Middle Ages and well into the Renaissance, Muslims, to the extent that they were thought about at all, were often regarded as pious, austere and a reproach to lax Christians. Saladin, in particular, was elevated to heroic status.
"The Arabs and Turks were not regarded as barbarians, nor were they consciously regarded as non-European, for there was little or no sense of any kind of European identity in this period," Irwin writes.
The Orient, initially regarded as a land of marvels, gradually turned into an object of study, and with the Frenchman Guillaume Postel, born in 1510, the first genuine Orientalist appears on the scene. Postel, a linguistic prodigy, learned Arabic so quickly that his teacher in Istanbul thought he might be a demon. He produced the first grammar of classical Arabic in Europe and, in other works, introduced Europeans to the life of Muhammad, the history of Islam and the culture of the Ottoman Turks. An admirer of all things Eastern, he was also, Irwin remarks casually, "a complete lunatic."
The Orientalists described by Irwin do seem to be a colorful bunch. The field attracted eccentrics, obsessed misfits and colonial administrators driven nearly mad by boredom. Edward Palmer, a Victorian Orientalist, poet and spy, embarked on a secret government mission to bribe Bedouin tribesmen near the Suez Canal but was unfortunately murdered for the gold he carried. He reportedly cursed his killers in eloquent Arabic before being shot.
At Oxford, Irwin studied with an Orientalist who once bicycled naked through the town, pursued by the police, whom he escaped by ditching his bicycle and swimming across the Cherwell River.
More often than not, the scholars Irwin describes took an enlightened view of the peoples and the cultures they studied. "There has been a marked tendency for Orientalists to be anti-imperialists," he writes, "as their enthusiasm for Arab or Persian or Turkish culture often went hand in hand with a dislike of seeing those people defeated and dominated by the Italians, Russians, British or French."