The path to a portly tummy is paved with good intentions: empty promises of pre-work yoga, lunchtime running, evening gym sessions. Our homes are riddled with twice-worn swimming costumes, barely broken-in trainers and sports bras graying glumly at the bottom of the knicker drawer. We are united by its abandoned sportswear, common ambition to make it to the gym, and a collective excuse: “I didn't have time.”
If the government could raise a tax on this phrase, it would probably have enough cash to buy every single adult his or her own personal trainer.
Meanwhile, we try and make our own amends. Really, who needs shouty people in Lycra when there are desk-squats, stair-climbs and walking to the shop to fit into a busy morning?
Don't pretend you don't understand what I'm on about. All those attempts to make up for our gym slackness: running up escalators, doing a bit of Pilates-lite while lying in front of the TV, two hours enthusiastic disco dancing at that wedding last weekend (which got especially high-impact when Wham! came on).
The problem is, none of us really knows if all this covert exercise action is having any effect. We have no ammunition when our binge-exercising colleagues belittle our efforts and scoff at our brags of extra-curricular ambling. Surely, every little helps?
raising the bar
Asker Jeukendrup, professor of exercise metabolism at Birmingham University, England, has some cheering news. “It all depends on what your goal is,” he says. “To get the health benefits, there is no need to do sport or go to the gym, just being physically active is enough.”
But, it transpires, there's active, and there's active. “Millions of years ago,” says Jeukendrup, “humans' physical activity levels were really high. Now we think activity, like the Tour de France, is totally extreme. But then, it would have been normal.”
So while the average office worker burns about 2,300 calories a day, our ancestors would have been using around 5,500. You are unlikely to make up the difference by getting off the bus a couple of stops early. Or even 4km early.
Thankfully, Jeukendrup reckons office workers only need to up their daily energy expenditure by 500 calories: “That's probably an hour's worth of walking. But you could do half-an-hour of walking, and then be more physically active, instead of sitting down and watching television.”
Doesn't sound too grueling, does it?
Ken Fox, professor of exercise and health sciences at Bristol University, England, says: “We are not in trouble because people aren't going to the gym and playing sport — the reason we're in trouble, is we've stopped being active in our general routines.”
Almost any movement is helpful — and for those of us with rather more than our fair share of tummy, walking is one of the best things we can do as it uses our own body weight.
But while that means a stroll round the shops can be good for you — although a brisk trot would be far more beneficial — you have not necessarily “earned” that piece of cake and glass of wine at the end of an exhausting afternoon. “It is dangerous if the reason you are increasing your activity is for energy balance,” says Fox. “You can overestimate how much activity you've done, and underestimate how much you've eaten. The equation is always unbalanced — it gets biased towards what people want to hear.”
Damn those exercise boffins, always trampling on our fitness plans. “We should be building exercise into our lives, and accepting it as part of our daily routine,” Fox says.
Steady as you go
You don't need to do it all at once — 10-minute bursts of activity are effective too. Half-an-hour of digging or shoveling in the garden can burn 250 calories, with 105 for weeding and 100 for raking. Moderate vacuuming, or mopping, will burn 160 calories an hour. Even clothes shopping is good exercise, especially when trying on different outfits — you can expect to burn around 100 calories an hour; 20 to 25 minutes washing and waxing the car can also dispose of 100. You'll also improve flexibility and upper body strength. And, of course, there's sex — half-an-hour of which can use up 120 to 180 calories. Kerry McCloskey, who wrote a book on the subject, claims she sometimes even clears the 350 calorie mark. “This is roughly the equivalent of briskly walking, running, or lifting weights for 30 minutes,” she says.
But you do need to keep these things in check. Two hours of dancing on a Saturday night after downing your own body weight in booze, will not give you the figure of a dancer. Lucy Banfield is a member of the ensemble for the London show, Dirty Dancing — and if you want be as fit as she is, you'll have to work hard. “When we're rehearsing we usually start at 10am and finish at 6pm. It will be learning a new dance and going over it again, and again, so rehearsing can be harder than doing a show,” she says. Even when she's performing in the evening, Banfield will attend dance classes and keep up with her Pilates.
So while it is perfectly possible to stay healthy and fit, without ever having to enter a gym — so long as you actually do walk to work, rather than just thinking about it — we shouldn't start closing down fitness centers quite yet. For a start, if you're looking to improve muscle tone, or add bulk, using specific gym equipment will be the most effective way. Second, the reason why we joined in the first place — to force ourselves to exercise more — is still an important factor. “At the gym there are more performance markers, so you can see your improvement because you can do something for longer, or do it better,” says Jeukendrup. “It's a way of motivating yourself.”
Signs of improvement are not so obvious in everyday life. Many sports scientists are reluctant to give average calorie-burning statistics on, say, vacuuming, as they differ wildly according to each person.
Be reassured, however, that panting up and down the office stairs — 15 to 20 minutes = around 100 calories — bottle of water in each hand, is in no way a waste of time.
See you in the top-floor meeting room for some quick star jumps.
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and