This novel is currently on offer in Taiwan in two different paperback editions, one costing only NT$300. Here is a must-read, the book trade seems to be saying. It was the unexpected winner of the 2005 Man Booker Prize for fiction, and for a decade and more people knowledgeable about contem-porary literature have been claiming John Banville as a true master. So, what is this seduc-tively short novel all about?
Essentially, it's a monologue about old age. You could truthfully say it was about youth and age, but it's mostly about age nonetheless. Banville's narrator, Max, is a retired art historian supposedly at work on a book on the French painter Pierre Bonnard, though you can be sure it's a book that'll never be finished. Following the death of his wife, Max returns to the Irish coast, scene of a childhood holiday, and eventually moves into an isolated beach-side hotel that was then the holiday home of a family, affluent compared to his, the Graces.
In the manner of the boy in L.P. Hartley's 1950s classic The Go-Between, Max ruminates about that summer long ago when he observed adult events he didn't fully understand. His mind wanders between three time-zones -- the present in the stultifying hotel, the illness and death of his wife, and the summer vacation back in his early teens. Now only death awaits him, of which the sea is an ancient symbol -- featureless, numbing, all-embracing.
What could be seen as the characteristics of old age inform the narrative -- aches and pains, addiction to memory, a tendency to mull over familiar territory, a preference for food over sex, and a general sense of lethargy and inertia. And here lies the essence of this novel's problem, divisible into two parts.
First, age is not a very exciting subject. We may all have it to look forward to, but most of us prefer not to contemplate the prospect just yet. And secondly, it's hard for an author engaged on such a project to disentangle his own concerns from his narrator's. Does Banville himself feel he's over the hill (he's currently only 61), or is he exercising a still insightful vigor on dissecting what characterizes the old in general? Either way, as any dramatist could have told him, when your chosen form is the monologue, it's hard to keep up the distinction.
"A person of scant talent and scanter ambitions, greyed o'er by the years, uncertain and astray and in need of consolation and the brief respite of drink-induced oblivion" -- this is Max's self-description. It's certainly not Banville's, but the implicit weariness nevertheless pervades his text.
Many of Max's concerns, too, are surely Banville's as well. Max is professionally interested in painting, and Banville has featured art experts and painters in several of his previous novels, notably The Untouchable (about the UK curator and spy Anthony Blunt) and The Book of Evidence (about a stolen painting). Furthermore, Banville's absent-minded speaker is endlessly quoting and half-quoting English literature. Banville, who spent many years as Literary Editor of The Irish Times, is surely also someone whose mind echoes with phrases like "exterminate all the brutes" (Conrad), "that is not it at all" (Eliot), "I did not mean to but I did" (quasi-Larkin), "darkness visible" (Milton), and many more.
There's an even greater apparent indebtedness, or, if you prefer, unconscious self-fashioning on the part of the narrator. The ghost of Samuel Beckett hovers over the proceedings. It isn't only a remembered lost love, as in Krapp's Last Tape, or the insistent use, common in Beckett's novels, of a character stumbling for words ("if that is the way to put it," "I think they were called," "that is the word, surely"). There are also whole sentences where Beckett's tone is unmistakable, such as, "I do not know what was the matter, I mean other than what is usually the matter." And finally Max coins an aphorism about God in a manner that's not very characteristic of him but is eminently Beckett-like: "Given the world that he has created, it would be an impiety against God to believe in him."
As for the novel's characters, they're little developed. There's the overblown father, Mr. Grace, the motherly mother (for whom the narrator as a boy develops an erotic attraction), the casually cruel children (the dominant girl and her deaf-mute brother), and their governess, who we're destined to learn more about later. Then there's the narrator's dying wife (unlike him, stubbornly independent) and his unmarriageable daughter. None are portrayed full-length, but presumably the world of ghosts, artistic and literary, that inhabit the speaker's mind are intended to make up for them.
The style is suitably mannerist for a failed art-critic, and the colors it characteristically evokes -- pewter, umber, pale lavender, burgundy, "the deepest imperial purple" -- are also appropriate enough. But the cult of obscure words such as "caducous," "mephitic," "crepitant," though certainly intended as geriatric pontification, is sleep-inducing nonetheless.
But at his best John Banville is a supremely fine novelist. The Untouchable is for me one of the really great books, endlessly re-readable, and his historical novels on Copernicus and Kepler (there's another on Newton) are also fascinating.
What The Sea lacks is energy. This was a danger implicit in the original conception, and in the event the narrator's near-aim-lessness also characterizes the book itself. In this novel Banville the master-stylist sets himself a difficult literary task -- how to make old age interesting -- and fails to find an answer. Maybe the sad truth is that there isn't one, unless, as Shakespeare does with Lear, you turn your character into a monster and let him discover a new purpose in raging against a world he used to love.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s