Brokeback Mountain is the resident, talked-about/blogged-about movie of the moment. With its excess of critical praise (including mine), Golden Globe nominations and box office record (highest per-screen gross of any non-animated movie in history), it's being touted as the film that'll take over the Oscars.
But that's not what people are talking and blogging about. In the midst of all the Brokeback brouhaha, men seem to be going out of their way to say they won't see it -- and then dispensing a really good reason why.
Some say Ang Lee's cowboy love story is not their cultural cup of tea. They hate romances of any kind. Or they hate cowboy films.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
"I'm not really all that interested in cowboy life," Houston poet Eric Blaylock told me. "It's just something [African-American males] don't relate to."
Others say they're resisting a liberal media trying to guilt-trip them. On his blog, Vanity Fair columnist James Wolcott called out several such guys, including Slate's Mickey Kaus, who invoked the name of liberal media king Frank Rich of The New York Times in his statement of contempt.
"When the film's national box office fails to live up to its hype and to the record attendance at a few early screenings," Kaus writes, "prepare to be subjected to a tedious round of guilt-tripping and chin-scratching by Frank Rich and every metropolitan daily entertainment writer who yearns to write about What the Movies Say About America Today. (Wild guess: They say we're still homophobic!) ... Maybe if we all go see it, Rich won't write about it!"
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
And James Lileks (at www.lileks.com) complained about Entertainment Weekly's giving the cover to Brokeback Mountain (plus an inside story to Transamerica) over The Chronicles of Narnia, as if the editors felt that they needed to "encourage movies about cowboys in love, because somewhere in some small town a gay youth looks at the box office grosses, and decides to stay in the closet out of fear he will be eaten by a computer generated lion who manifests the stigmata. Or something like that." (For the record, the magazine did its next cover story on Narnia.)
Leave it to Larry David, co-creator of Seinfeld and star of the HBO sitcom Curb Your Enthusiasm, to boldly go where no straight man would even think about going: He said he's afraid the movie might turn him gay.
In a New York Times op-ed piece headlined Cowboys Are My Weakness, David describes himself as a "susceptible" person -- "easily influenced, a natural-born follower with no sales-resistance."
"If two cowboys, male icons who are 100 percent all-man, can succumb, what chance to do I have, half to a quarter of a man, depending on whom I'm with at the time?" David writes.
Later, he admits that there are perks when you are part of "the gay business": "I know I've always gotten along great with men. I never once paced in my room rehearsing what to say before asking a guy if he wanted to go to the movies. And I generally don't pay for men, which of course is their most appealing attribute."
David's piece was funnier than nearly all of Curb's recent season. But you can't deny that there is some truth in it. After all, in this country, some people think homosexuality is an epidemic -- scarier than Communism, folks! -- and some even consider Brokeback a recruitment film.
If anything was more predictable than the hype for Brokeback, given its credentials and strategic release, it's the backlash. And the backlash is bubbling away.
Baltimore Sun critic Michael Sragow recently revisited Howard Hawks' 1948 western Red River, starring John Wayne and the notor-iously closeted Montgomery Clift, and called it a more striking gay cowboy movie than the "all-too-sane and tasteful" Brokeback. In LA Weekly, writer/critic/gay historian David Ehrenstein called Brokeback a "saddle-packing same-sex equivalent of Guess Who's Coming to Dinner."
Ehrenstein also clocks off a list of truly groundbreaking "queer films," including works by gay filmmakers Gus Van Sant (My Own Private Idaho), Todd Haynes (Velvet Goldmine) and Gregg Araki (Mysterious Skin). It's similar to what New York Press critic Armond White did when he slammed Brokeback and gave shout-outs to lesser-known films such as Son Frere, A Thousand Clouds of Peace and last year's Loggerheads, made by North Carolina filmmaker Tim Kirkman.
True, there are films that are more captivating and compelling when it comes to capturing gay culture (and thus never get seen, much less hyped). But you've got to give Brokeback props for getting people talking. Hey, I don't see people debating all over the place about Cheaper By The Dozen 2.
Films with touchy subjects are meant to be debated, discussed and dissected -- by the people who see them, of course. If there is a film you don't want to see, like Cheaper by the Dozen 2, it doesn't necessarily mean you hate kids or families or Bonnie Hunt or whatever. It just means you're not interested in seeing it, and you might not be equipped to join the discussion.
And remember, no film is going to single-handedly destroy the moral, traditional fabric of our country. (That's been gone for quite some time now, and for those of you who still think there's one, you're just as in the closet as the two cowboys in the movie.)
Besides, a friend of mine, a man who has been married for 10 years, saw it, liked it and is just fine about the whole thing.
However, he does keep telling me he wishes he knew how to quit me.
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and