Thu, Jan 12, 2006 - Page 15 News List

The conceptual artist as vandal

Last week a neo-Dadaist attacked Marcel Duchamp's `Fountain' and once again challenged conceptual art's foundations

By Alan Riding  /  NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE , PARIS

Marcel Duchamp's Fountain in the Dada exhibition, at the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris. Pierre Pinoncelli, 77, a French performance artist was arrested last week after taking a small hammer to the work.

PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE

The Dada movement made its name in the early 20th century by trying to destroy the conventional notion of art. Taking literal inspiration from their exploits this week, a latter-day neo-Dadaist took a small hammer to Marcel Duchamp's Fountain, the factory-made urinal that is considered the cornerstone of conceptual art.

The assailant, a French performance artist named Pierre Pinoncelli, was immediately arrested after his act of vandalism last week, during the final days of the Dada exhibition at the Centre Georges Pompidou. The porcelain urinal was slightly chipped in the attack and was withdrawn to be restored.

Pinoncelli, 77, who urinated into the same urinal and struck it with a hammer in a show in Nimes in 1993, has a long record of organizing bizarre happenings. Police officials said he again called his action a work of art, a tribute to Duchamp and other Dada artists.

Indeed, Fountain itself was rejected for being neither original nor art when Duchamp offered it for the first exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists in New York in 1917. That version of the urinal, displayed upside down and signed "R. Mutt," was subsequently lost. The Pompidou's Fountain is one of eight signed replicas made by Duchamp in 1964.

After the attack last Wednesday, Pinoncelli was held by the police overnight. He was released the next day and ordered to appear in court Jan. 24 to answer charges of damaging the property of others. As in 1993, he could face a prison term or a fine. (After the first urinal attack, he was jailed for a month and fined the equivalent of US$37,500.)

The Centre Georges Pompidou said it was too early to know the cost of restoring the work. (Curators said a different Duchamp urinal was already scheduled for inclusion in the version of the show traveling to the National of Gallery of Art in Washington, Feb. 19 through May 14, and to the Museum of Modern Art in New York, June 18 through Sept. 11.)

The vandalism raises the persistent question of how valuable works of art can be protected in museums that log millions of visitors each year.

Many paintings on display today are shielded by glass. At the Louvre, the Mona Lisa, which was stolen in 1911 and struck by a stone in 1956, is now in a sealed enclosure behind thick glass.

Pinoncelli's attack also refocuses attention on the perennial question of what defines art. The question, playfully yet provocatively raised by the Dada movement nearly a century ago, has been refreshed since the 1980s by succeeding waves of conceptual, installation and performance art.

Like this week's case, such protests are often waged by artists themselves.

In 1999, for example, two Chinese artists, Yuan Cai and Jian Junxi Ianjun, jumped on My Bed, a work by the British artist Tracey Emin comprising an unmade bed accompanied by empty bottles, dirty underwear and used condoms, that was on view at the Tate Britain. The next year, the same two artists urinated on the Tate Modern's version of Fountain, noting that Duchamp himself said artists defined art.

A British artist, Michael Landy, held what he called Break Down in an empty department store in London in 2001: in this event, he destroyed all his possessions, including art donated by friends. Two other British artists, the Chapman brothers, were accused of vandalism in 2003 when they added the faces of clowns and puppets to the 80 etchings in an edition of Goya's Disasters of War that they had purchased.

This story has been viewed 4972 times.
TOP top