Militarized Modernity and Gendered Citizenship in South Korea -- what a title! The subject matter is relatively simple when you separate it out, however, which is not to say the book itself is easy reading.
What it sets out to show is how the post-Korean War state on the south of the peninsula established itself as modern, that is to say industrialized, and at the same time became a bulwark against Communism. This involved the maintenance of strong military forces and the suppression of a large number of human rights.
In the process the expected roles of men and of women became polarized. Men were encouraged, some would say forced, to be dominating, overbearing, "courageous" and frequently disdainful of the other sex. Once out of the forces, they were told they were Nature's breadwinners. Women, on the other hand, were taught to be docile and family-centered, even though various campaigns to encourage birth-control also characterized the post-war era.
This period following the end of the Korean War in 1953 was also a time of cruel authoritarian repression in South Korean society. Protesters were fired on and suspected Communist-sympathizers trailed and sometimes disposed of. But a period of democratization and freeing-up followed. The continuing effects of the earlier repressive style of government is one of the things examined by Seungsook Moon, an Associate professor at the US' prestigious Vassar College.
What is exceptionally interesting for readers in Taiwan is how closely Taiwanese conditions, in our case from 1949 to 1987, mirrored those of South Korea, but how extravagantly different the two societies are today. Indeed, one of the most extraordinary features of the modern history of East Asia is how quickly and apparently easily Taiwan shook off the vestiges of authoritarian rule and became, almost overnight, a flourishing libertarian democracy. South Korea is also now a democracy, but if this book is to be believed conditions there remain rather different from those in Taiwan.
The first thing that will strike someone picking up this book may well be the photos. One of these, for instance, shows 10 male figures face downwards on the ground, with their hands tied behind their backs, supporting themselves on the tips of their toes and the crown of their skulls. The caption reads, "Military-style punishment on a college campus, 1995." A college campus? In 1995? That anything remotely similar could have happened in Taiwan at that date is laughable.
Other pictures show "military confrontation between riot police and unionized workers of Daewoo Automobile Co, 2001" where there are approximately the same number of military as there are workers in the photo, one side pushing against a steel barrier, the other resisting. Another shows "the first Women Workers Festival in Seoul, 1988," with six women standing on what looks like the stage of a smallish school. Just imagine the gaudy display that would have attended any such gathering in Taiwan, even at that date!
This is an academic book and as such unlikely to be read by even quite enthusiastic Korea-watchers. It is not addressed to them, however, but to the author's fellow-academics interested in refining such concepts of modernity and evolving gender-roles. Even so, there is much interesting material here if the reader has the patience to unearth it.
During the 1970s, for instance, long hair for men and short skirts for women were forbidden, and police went around with scissors and tape-measures, cutting the offending men's hair in public as a lesson to others. Middle-managers in the Hyundai factories were subjected to kicks to the knee by their superiors for perceived faults. Dissidents were subjected, in this author's words, to "extremely violent punishment" by intelligence agencies prior to 1987 (as significant a year for South Korea as it was for Taiwan). And author Hwang Sok-yong was sentenced to solitary confinement for five years for attending a conference in the North as recently as 1993.
Even so, the country has in the last decade experienced many of the developments seen in Taiwan. During that time South Korea, according to Seungsook Moon, has witnessed a decline in the kind of confrontational, anti-capitalist agitation provoked by former hard-line policies, and the growth of such things as legal organizations pursuing improvement in the quality of everyday life, and the education of the public in such things as rights for workers, women, rural farmers, migrant laborers and sexual minorities, and the pursuit of peace (and eventual reunification) on the peninsular, together with environmental protection and opposition to nuclear weapons.
It is probably taken for granted by most observers that one day North Korea will collapse and the Korean peninsula will be reunited, if only because the model of Germany is inevitably in everyone's mind. Things may not be that simple, however. China is not showing the signs of weakness that the Soviet Union did in the late 1980s, though it appears to be pioneering the resolution of the issue of North Korea's nuclear weapons, something that makes the North a potentially more belligerent hornet to deal with than East Germany ever was.
This book, however, does not concern itself primarily with such issues. Its interest is historical and sociological. It wants to demonstrate that there are more ways than one in which modernization can take place and gender consciousness be manipulated -- in South Korea's case as part of a military state that could on occasion massacre its citizens in a way that in Taiwan, whatever other abuses existed, didn't happen after February 1947.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would