This is a very optimistic book. In it, Bruce Gilley sticks his neck out and insists that a democratic China is an inevitability. It may happen tomorrow, or it may happen in 20 years' time, but happen one day it surely will.
Enemies of this view, he writes, are either mystical "Orientalists" who believe that China is somehow different from other countries, or "Manichaeans" who think that the Communist Party's apparatus of control is far more sophisticated than he believes.
Against the view that China is somehow a special case, Gilley argues that Asia has already spawned viable democracies in India, Japan, Thailand, South Korea and, most
significantly of all, Taiwan. China is no more "different" than anywhere else in the region. And
liberal democracy, he believes,
following Francis Fukuyama, has now become the accepted "best pattern" for social and political
organization world-wide, a fact sometimes disguised by the
triumphalism of the West.
In support of this optimistic analysis and set of predictions, the author argues that change from the current one-party system in China is most likely to come in the form of a "young Turks" take-over by people quite highly placed in Beijing's
government, rather than by a
revolution from below such as was attempted with such catastrophic results in Tiananmen Square in June 1989. "It remains a singular fact," he insists," that one of the world's biggest, dynamic and
culturally rich societies continues to be ruled by a corrupt and
repressive dictatorship.
"The departure of the Chinese Communist Party will be simply the passing of yet another Chinese dynasty, he argues, albeit also one of the most important events of the 21st century. He goes on to assert that it's quite possible the CCP will limp along through the first couple of decades of this century, but that this will have little effect on its ultimate destiny.
By Bruce Gilley,
297 Pages,
Columbia University Press.
"Diplomatic vitriol from Beijing," he writes, "and the narrow business and academic interests of those involved in China have exerted a strong influence in curtailing the debate. But doing so ... risks leaving the world unprepared to deal with this major event."
How will such a change come about? Gilley mentions several scenarios -- the official reversal of the party-line on Tiananmen, a "southern tour" by a leading reformer in the style of the one Deng Xiaoping took in order to announce his economic reforms -- but both of these would merely be the outward and visible signs of something deeper. Somehow the moment has to happen when those holding power acquiesce in surrendering it to others. Many such moments
elsewhere are studied, but all are
different, the author points out, and influenced by local conditions.
What would the effect be on Taiwan of such a development? Gilley is cautious here. This would not automatically be good news for Taipei, he argues. Three disaster scenarios for an attack on Taiwan are offered. First comes a last-ditch move by a tottering CCP. Second is an early gambit by a newly-installed democratic leadership in Beijing to prove its patriotic credentials. And third is "a sudden policy decision in later years as China's democracy enters its troubled youth."
He therefore concludes it will be of paramount importance for
whoever is in charge of the central government in Taipei not to use the democratization of China as the occasion to make a bid for



