Darren Higgins was all set to be a doctor. It made sense. He had always liked science. And for the son of a career military man, medicine was a good match for Higgins. It was regimented, hard work, for the good of others. There was just one problem. Higgins loved bacteria. Salmonella fascinated him. Shigella was a turn on. He could spend hours thinking about pathogenic neisseria, the cause of bacterial meningitis. And then there was listeria, a deadly, but largely overlooked, food-borne pathogen that under the right circumstances can kill more people faster than anthrax.
As a student, Higgins saw them all under the microscope and got hooked on the detective work required to determine one from another. He scrapped medical school plans and devoted himself to learning how pathogens make a living, get inside cells, replicate, spread disease and sometimes death, and what scientists can do to stop them.
It worked out for him. Still just 38, Higgins is an assistant professor of microbiology and molecular genetics at Harvard Medical School. He is, according to colleagues, a rising star. And his latest work, recently published in the journal Science, has created something of a buzz among other bacteria lovers.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
The study looked at how listeria infects the cells of a fruit fly. But instead of focusing on the pathogen, Higgins and his team decided to focus on the cell. They wanted to know what genes allow the infection to get inside in the first place.
"No one had ever done this before," Higgins said recently from his office overlooking the quad at Harvard Medical School. "We say it's a two-way street, a two-way interaction. The pathogen has to interact with the host -- has to get something from the host -- to be able to do these things. We wanted to know what the host was bringing to the table."
Higgins has been thinking differently ever since he was a child, moving from city to city and sometimes country to country, following his father and the call of the US Air Force. Constantly the new kid, Higgins learned early on that he couldn't wait for others to befriend him. He had to go to them.
"I was always the outsider," he said. But not for long. He learned to be outgoing, forced himself to talk to others, made friends, and these days he considers his nomadic childhood a good thing. He is a scientist, but not a wallflower. And although new acquaintances may not immediately understand what Higgins does for a living, he has a way of putting it just so.
"I love what I do," he said. "It's a profession and it's a hobby. Not that I'm so socially inept that I don't do other stuff. But routinely, I'd rather do stuff in the lab than sit around on the couch all day doing nothing."
On this, his colleagues agree. Vic DiRita, a microbiology professor at the University of Michigan and Higgins' mentor during his doctoral studies there, called Higgins one of the hardest working scientists he knows. "That trumps everything in science," DiRita said. And apparently, the hard work is paying off.
In his fruit fly study, Higgins and his team identified some 270 genes that cells don't need to survive and how the bacteria interacts with them. Now, with further studies, he hopes to isolate which genes allow the infection to actually get inside the cell and spread. If it's one of the genes not needed by the cell, it could be blocked, Higgins said, stopping the spread of listeria and, perhaps, other bacteria.
The work that could have far-reaching effects, he explained. Perhaps most importantly, it could reduce our reliance on antibiotics to stop bacteria. And while that may not make for the most exciting cocktail party conversation, it's making a name for Darren Higgins.
"It's immensely cool," he said.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless