The poets who came of age in the years before, during and after World War II were faced with a giant Freudian dilemma: How were they to come to terms with the
gigantic legacy of the preceding generation -- the great Modernists such as T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens and Hart Crane? How were they to absorb the lessons of those masters and yet discover original voices of their own? How were they to avoid being crushed by the weight, solemnity and critical reputation of their esteemed predecessors?
In his eloquent and astute new book, the critic Adam Kirsch looks at some prominent US members of that post-modernist era -- Robert Lowell, Elizabeth Bishop, John Berryman, Randall Jarrell, Delmore Schwartz and their slightly later cousin Sylvia Plath -- and examines how, in wrestling with the anxiety of influence, they helped redefine the boundaries of contemporary verse, pioneering a new level of autobiographical exposure while giving voice to a more informal sort of writing that expanded poetry's range of diction, tone and subject matter.
Most of the poets discussed in this volume began writing under the umbrella of modernism and the then-dominant school of "New Criticism," which enshrined the modernist dogma of impersonality, symbolism and obscurity, and its dense, allusive language.
In their early years, they tended to write poems that dutifully hewed to their mentors' strictures, but in time each tried, in his or her own way, to break free from the styles and subjects that modernism had deemed suitable.
"In Jarrell's dramatic monologues and Schwartz's family epic, Bishop's tense plainspokenness and Berryman's jagged comedy, the values of Modernism are tested, resisted, and transcended," Kirsch writes. "As Schwartz wrote in 1954, `What the [old] literary methods exclude from all but the privacy of the journal or the letter is brought to the surface and exposed to direct examination by the new method."
Kirsch, the book critic for the New York Sun, does a wonderfully nimble job of conveying each poet's individual achievement and the evolution of his or her style, as apprenticeship gave way to maturity, as new techniques and language were invented to accommodate new ideas and material.
Writing in a manner that is at once erudite and accessible, Kirsch proves equally adept at dispensing the sort of close readings of individual poems championed by the New Critics and at explicating correspondences between a poet's life and art in a fashion that would have been anathema to the high modernists.
Like Martin Amis writing about novels, he writes about the poets in this volume as a fellow practitioner; his poetry collection The Thousand Wells won the 2002 New Criterion Poetry Prize. He uses his firsthand knowledge of the craft to make the hydraulics and verbal magic of a given poem thoroughly palpable to the reader.
In addition, his easy familiarity with the complete oeuvres of his subjects enables him to convey authoritatively -- and succinctly -- the arc of each writer's career, while revealing the hard-won knowledge (the underwater part of the iceberg, as it were) that lies beneath the innovations of later years.
In fact, it is one of Kirsch's central arguments that the "discipline, seriousness and technical sophistication" that these poets acquired during their modernist apprenticeships enabled them to produce poems about newly intimate subjects that possessed the rigor and shapeliness of lasting art -- poems that stand in sharp contrast to the outpourings of earnest but flabby "confessional" verse produced from the 1960s on, in the wake of Robert Lowell's epochal book Life Studies.
While that book's revelations of mental illness and familial strife opened the floodgates to poems about madness, marital grief and emotional dysfunction, he argues, Lowell's best work was not catalyzed by therapeutic or penitential motives, but by more purely aesthetic ends.
"What gives the poems of Life Studies their enduring value," Kirsch writes, "is not their honesty about Lowell's personal life, but their artistic form; the poet's experiences are not simply revealed but shaped through rhythm and symbol and tone, into works of art. Lowell could not have written poems like Waking in the Blue and Sailing Home From Rapallo without the formal mastery he acquired during his rigorous New Critical training."
Kirsch makes a similar argument about John Berryman's harrowingly intimate Dream Songs, the strongest of which did not so much transcribe his own traumatic experiences as transform and ironize them.
Because of the dramatic evolution of Lowell and Berryman's poetry (which moved from imitative Modernist formality to dramatic and vernacular self-exposure) and the comparative weight of their literary achievement, Kirsch's essays about them stand as the centerpiece of this volume.
Some of the other chapters in The Wounded Surgeon are decidedly less illuminating. The argument can be made that Elizabeth Bishop does not really belong in the group of writers Kirsch has selected: Her poetry, after all, was less explicitly autobiographical than that of the others and far more reliant on symbols. Sylvia Plath, too, seems like something of an anomaly in this literary constellation. She belongs to a younger generation, and the complex mythologizing dynamic between her life and work eludes the somewhat narrow and didactic analysis presented in these pages.
These, however, are quibbles. In The Wounded Surgeon, Kirsch has not only succeeded in communicating the achievement of six remarkable American poets, but in doing so, has also established himself as a poetry critic of the very first order.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would