The CO4 exhibition showcasing Taiwanese avant-garde arts opened Friday at the Huashan Cultural and Creative Industry Center. When it closes this January, so will Taipei's largest experimental art venue. The center will reopen next year, but how much of its original architecture will be preserved after NT$8 billion is spent on renovations has become a searing debate between local artists and government officials.
In theory, both sides have the same vision: an environment for artists to exhibit their work and attract a wider audience -- but their approaches are different and only complicated by rumors and limited dialogue.
PHOTO COURTESY OF BEN ZULLO
In early November, the Council for Cultural Affairs (CCA) released a press statement indicating it would not renew its current management contract with L'Orangerie International Art Consultants so that it could establish its own foundation to run Huashan.
PHOTO COURTESY OF COUNCIL FOR CULTURAL AFFAIRS
The news triggered a series of public demonstrations led by artist Tang Huang-chen (
Margaret Lai-Huang Shiu (
Minister Chen Chi-nan (
The area currently in use occupies only 12 percent of the 7.21 hectares owned by the central government. According to Chiao Lin (
Because it was declared a cultural site, however, it cannot be sold to a commercial developer. Although Lin could not give any exact figures, he said the land would be valued similar to that in the Zhongxiao East Road district, which is estimated at NT$1 million per ping (3.3m2).
In an attempt to prevent the site from going to waste, the CCA, under Chen, intends to "turn it into a landmark of contemporary culture in Taiwan," Lin said.
"We believe that providing a creative-industry center for artists to showcase their work will give birth to a new contemporary culture in Taiwan. We are desperately in need of a space to establish this culture and there is no need to congest it in the small space being used now," he added.
Chen defines a creative-industry center as "a special site for artists from many media including performance arts, visual communications, architecture, textiles and design to exchange ideas and work on joint projects."
The CCA's blueprint plan does not alter any of the three heritage sites, but instead proposes to build three additional buildings among the old ones. These will include an international hostel to house visiting artists, a performance hall to hold some 2,000 people, and a high-rise building with floors for studio and exhibition space, a coffee shop and bookstore and administration office space for the CCA.
Demand in Question
Shiu questions the CCA logic that suggests if they build it, people will come. As an avant-garde artist with a background in economics, she said: "Why build these enormous facilities until we are sure there is a demand for them? There should be research first to see if there is a need for such a creative industry park in Taipei city. If not, we will end up with three beautiful empty buildings that cannot be maintained by taxpayer money. And then what is stopping the CCA from selling the public space off to developers?"
Tang, the Huashan activist, is equally concerned about whether a bigger venue will attract a large audience.
"The most important thing is to first have quality performances that attract people and then if there is enough demand, expand the site," she said.
Tang and members of the Golden Bough Theater (
For the next five years, Shiu and former minister of the CCA Tchen Yu-chiou (
Before renovations could get started, plans were brought to a stop, not because of sensationalized and unfounded reports of drug parties, which made headlines in newspapers in mid-2002, but because in June Tchen was replaced by Chen, the new minister with a new vision.
Under the "Creative Taiwan: Creativity and Culture Industry Development Project" (
Five months later, Chen replaced Tchen, but plans to "revitalize the space and make it more appealing to the general public" were maintained, he said.
In 2003, he opened bidding on a management contract and in January this year, the CCA tenured out a one-year contract to L'Orangerie. That contract ends in January.
During the past year, Huashan has changed immensely and most will agree it's exterior is easier on the eye. Internal changes have also emerged with more commercial exhibits, in addition to a gift store and retail coffee shop.
At present Huashan operates at 90 percent government and 10 percent commercial funding. Rose Hsu (
Hsu's idea is to have roughly 65 percent or less government funding, with the rest coming from the private sector. This does not mean the site will be overrun by retail chains, she said.
Accessibility
Hsu agrees with Chen that to reach a wider audience it is necessary to establish spaces separate from the arts, such as cafes, bookstores or independently run shops by local artists and designers.
"Experimental arts do not have a large following, but if we can attract people with a nice environment then hopefully it will let more people know about avant-garde art in Taiwan," she said.
Hsu doesn't agree with Chen, however, that a venue with full government funding will give freedom to the artists to experiment. "If the government controls too much do you think the arts will be able to criticize the government? Huashan should not become a showcase for the government," she said.
When asked if the CCA would be in charge of appointing the employees of the proposed Huashan Arts Foundation that will run the center starting next year, Chen was firm. "That's a ridiculous idea. We are administrators. We don't have the qualifications to determine who is best to run this facility. We just provide the space and resources."
He did not, however, provide any confirmation on who or how the CCA's foundation will be formed.
Shiu and Tang said the best way to manage the site is to first establish a board composed of the CCA, artists and corporate officials who elect a chairperson, as was done at the wildly successful Esplanade Cultural Arts Center in Singapore.
As far as external renovations are concerned, the proposal for three new buildings is part of a long-term plan that includes removal of the dilapidated buildings along Beiping Road (behind Huashan) to create a large park. There is no set date for completion of the plan, but more than 10 architects have been invited to see the space.
Before any major construction begins, by law the CCA must open bidding to the public on the contract.
Huashan will close its doors this winter, but who will run the venue as part of the new Huashan Arts Foundation when it reopens remains a point of heated debate, although the similarities of both sides' wishes for the site suggest that if the parties were to engage in dialogue about the issue then it might not be a major issue at all.
Facts and fictions about Huashan:
★Fiction: The CCA will build a 28-floor government office building
★Fact: This is not in the proposal, although there is a plan to erect a high-rise (10 floors) that will include studios and an exhibition floor for public art projects. One floor will also be used for the CCA administration.
★Fiction: The CCA will build three new buildings on top of the three heritage buildings.
★Fact: There are three new buildings in the proposal, but in no proposal blueprint are they shown on top of existing buildings. Before any development takes place, a bidding on the contact must be open to the public.
★Fiction: Huashan will become a commercial theme park for tourists.
★Fact: Chen stressed that Huashan will not be a commercial venture with franchise shops and restaurants. Whether retail chains will be permitted to open on-site will be left to the management.
★Fiction: Huashan will be run by government employees under the pretext of an arts foundation.
★Fact: Yes, a new arts foundation will be established by the CCA. According to Chen, it will run independently of the government. He has not said how or who will elect this foundation.
★Fiction: Huashan is one of five creative industry art parks to be established by the CCA over the next few years
★Fact: There are no plans to turn the other four cultural heritage sites into creative industry centers. When asked about the issue, Chen replied: "There is not enough interest in Taiwan to sustain five."
For further information on the debate, check online at www.happyart.idv.tw and www. CCA.gov.tw.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
Peter Brighton was amazed when he found the giant jackfruit. He had been watching it grow on his farm in far north Queensland, and when it came time to pick it from the tree, it was so heavy it needed two people to do the job. “I was surprised when we cut it off and felt how heavy it was,” he says. “I grabbed it and my wife cut it — couldn’t do it by myself, it took two of us.” Weighing in at 45 kilograms, it is the heaviest jackfruit that Brighton has ever grown on his tropical fruit farm, located