They came from the cotton fields of Mississippi, the plantations of Georgia and the tobacco farms of North Carolina and Kentucky. \nFugitive slaves, fleeing America's southern states, seeking freedom in Canada, Mexico or the "free" northern states, in the years before and during the American Civil War of 1861to 1865. \nTens of thousands of runaway slaves made the dangerous journey, with the help of an informal network of abolitionists and safe houses that came to be known as the "Underground Railroad." \nThe story of those early activists has often been lost in the telling of the history of the American slave trade, but a US$80 million museum that celebrates its grand opening this weekend -- The National Underground Railroad Freedom Center -- aims to rectify that oversight. \n"We want to provide a powerful experience that demonstrates how the conviction, dedication and passion of some very diverse people changed the world 150 years ago," said Spencer Crew, the museum's executive director. \nThe center sits on the Ohio River in downtown Cincinnati, across the river from Kentucky, a former slave state. \nThis southern Ohio city has had its share of race relations problems in recent years, but during the 1850s and 1860s, Cincinnati, and Ohio, were at the crossroads of the "Underground Railroad" -- a circumstance owing as much, if not more, to geography as to politics and community values. \nThe state's 200km of river frontage with Kentucky and 250km border with western Virginia made freedom only a river's width away for slaves from those states and others who reached them from the Deep South. \nOne study concluded that nearly 3,750km of escape routes zigzagged across Ohio. \n"In the Ohio River Valley, there was a virtual war going on over the issue of the Underground Railroad helping fugitive slaves get their freedom," said Crew. "Historically, we've earned our bones." \nThe center's defining artifact is a two-story slave pen, recovered from a Kentucky farm where it once was used to hold slaves awaiting transport to auctions. \nOther signature displays include possessions of abolitionist Frederick Douglass and Uncle Tom's Cabin author Harriet Beecher Stowe, as well as films narrated by talkshow host Oprah Winfrey and actor Danny Glover. \nThe exhibits seek to paint a picture of the abolitionists and free blacks who acted as "conductors" on the railroad, risking fines and worse -- people like Levi Coffin. \nA white Quaker who became one of the nation's best-known anti-slavery leaders and is sometimes called the "president of the Underground Railroad," Coffin is credited with ushering nearly 3,000 fugitives over the Ohio and Indiana lines. \n"I soon became extensively known to the friends of the slaves at different points on the Ohio," wrote Coffin, who sometimes concealed fugitives for weeks in his home or in the dry goods store that he operated in downtown Cincinnati. \nCoffin and his comrades-in-arms in the Underground Railroad, which was neither a railroad, nor underground, may have helped anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 slaves slip their bonds, according to the best estimates of scholars. \nAs highly organized in some places as it was spontaneous in others, the Underground Railroad was by nature amorphous and secretive, especially after the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act allowed slave owners or their agents to pursue and seize fugitive slaves in free states and territories. \nFugitives were called passengers or cargo, those who guided them over the circuitous routes were conductors, and the homes, barns or other hiding places where they found shelter along the way were referred to as depots or stations. \nIn Ohio, they encountered a state with sharply discriminatory laws and widespread racial bias. "Black Laws," among other things, required blacks to post US$500 bonds to establish residence and prohibited blacks from testifying against whites in court. \nBut most could at least take comfort from the knowledge that their new conditions, however unenviable, were generally a vast improvement from the often inhumane circumstances that they left behind in southern locales where they were treated as private \nproperty. \nThe center opened to the public earlier this month, but its formal dedication is scheduled for today, the day the UN has singled out to commemorate the abolition of slavery.
Scott Saulters wasn’t sure if his film had just taken one of the two top prizes at a recent film competition. Although Saulters has been in Taiwan for 15 years and is proficient in Mandarin, the award ceremony for the inaugural “Bi Tian Iann” (眯電影) short film contest was conducted entirely in Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), a language he can’t speak. “I thought I heard it, but I didn’t want to look too excited,” he says. Despite his limited command of the tongue, Saulter’s entry, Wu Yu Tzu (烏魚子, mullet roe), took first place in the amateur category of the
Since its launch in 2014, the Taiwan Season has increasingly become a “must-see” at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. So, when this year’s three-week Fringe became an early casualty of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, Chen Pin-chuan (陳斌全) was determined that the Taiwan Season must continue in some form. Chen, director of the Cultural Division of the Taipei Representative Office in the UK, says that he and Taiwan Season curator and producer Yeh Jih-wen (葉紀紋) had been thinking of ways of growing and adding value to the season anyway. The crisis and the cancellation of the live performances brought those ideas forward as
The Taiwan of yesteryear was dominated in whole or in part by the Dutch, Spanish, Qing Empire and Japanese. But is the Taiwanese name for a popular edible fish derived from the Portuguese language? Cheng Wei-chung (鄭維中), an associate research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Taiwan History, says yes. The fish in question is the narrow-barred Spanish mackerel, which was listed in early 18th century Qing local gazetteers as Taiwanese specialities alongside milk fish and mullet, according to Cheng’s paper, “Mullet, narrow-barred Spanish mackerel and milkfish: Multiple contextual developments of three certified seafood specilaities in Taiwan, from the
In the regular drumbeat of arrests of alleged Chinese spies, one case last month stood out. It did not involve the US or another rival of China, but Russia, whose security services accused a prominent arctic scientist of selling classified data on technologies for detecting submarines. Meanwhile a court in Kazakhstan in October convicted the Central Asia nation’s preeminent China specialist of espionage, a move widely interpreted at the time as a warning against increased meddling by the superpower next door. Both men maintain their innocence and if China is spying on Russia, Moscow is surely doing the same. Even so, the fact