The long, drawn-out and much maligned campaign to amend the Broadcasting and Television Law (
While the crux of the act sets out to rid broadcast-media of its political bias, the revisions are also aimed at ridding the nation of radio frequency monopolies and establishing more public television channels. Regardless of party affiliation, these moves are considered by many as pivotal to the democratization of Taiwan's broadcast media.
"It is an odd situation in Taiwan, as so many broadcast media outlets are either owned or run by active members of the nation's political parties. The situation is still very much like it was during KMT one-party rule," said Tony Lu (
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
The government currently owns 75.04 percent of Chinese Television System (CTS, 華視), 47.39 percent of Taiwan Television (TTV, 台視), finances Hakka TV (哈客TV) and runs four radio stations -- Police Radio System (警察廣播電台), Fu-Hsing Broadcasting (復興廣播電台), National Education Radio (教育廣播電台) and Voice of Han (漢聲廣播電台).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) media assets include 35.6 percent of China Television Company (CTV,
The government made de-politicizing of the media its goal four years ago, but it wasn't until last year that party-affiliated media moguls began to feel the pinch. In September, President Chen Shui-bian (
As a result, 12 DPP legislators resigned their posts within the media. But the actions of others, such as the DPP's Huang Chao-hui (
"Taiwan has so many television channels that people can watch news and national issue-related programs almost 24 hours a day. The dangers of political influence are at an all-time high and there is a now a genuine need for media openness and non-partisanship," said Hsu Rong-chi (
If passed, the revised law will see the biggest shake-up within the local broadcast media since the inception of cable television in the mid-1990s. The end goal is to create at least eight new public television channels and to clear the monopoly of radio airwaves to allow for the establishment of more publicly owned radio stations.
"It is very important for the future of Taiwan's media. I think the Legislative Yuan will resist making the changes at first because there will be a question of where the money to do this will come from," said Professor Chang Chin-hwa (
Several options
While the government plans to adopt a gradual approach to the nationalizing of CTS and is still weighing the possibilities of either nationalizing or commercializing TTV and CTV, it has already taken the first steps in its bid to de-monopolize the nation's radio frequencies.
By the end of 2005, all four government-run radio stations will have been nationalized or sold off into the private sector. The government hopes that shortly thereafter, upwards of 30 new local radio stations will be established on the frequencies once owned by the BCC.
The BCC has already agreed to return 14 frequencies by year's end, but the station remains at loggerheads with the government over its demand that the station return to the public domain all 69 frequencies that were given it by the KMT over a period of 50 years.
"[The BCC's] monopoly is undemocratic and means that the number of legal stations is very limited. The monopoly is the reason why there are so many pirate radio stations operating in Taiwan," said Hsu.
"For such a small country, the number of underground radio stations is phenomenal. By opening these frequencies it will enable more people to establish legal radio stations and pave the way for free radio."
According to the most recent government report, there are at least 200 pirate radio stations operating at any given time in Taiwan, as opposed to the 175 legally licensed stations. The government's request that the BCC return all 69 frequencies might be seen by some as one more step on the road to democratization, but it has left the BCC with the impression that the move is nothing less then an encroachment on media freedom.
"I can't understand why the government wants to take back [the BCC's] wavelengths. If we haven't made mistakes and we've abided by the law, then why should we have to give [frequencies] back?" asked Bobby Chong (
In a recent press release, the station alleged that the government had ignored the problem of pirate radio for the reason that "most of the them are supporters of the ruling party."
Not everyone, however, views the BCC's monopoly in the same light, and still others feel the station is suffering from an acute case of paranoia.
"Party or government ownership is a big problem and Taiwan needs more independent media. I think the BCC should get rid of its party ownership and take a more open direction with regard to programming and management," said Chang. "You have to ask the question: Who do these channels serve if they are all owned by a single political party?"
High hopes
The government's plan to reclaim the airwaves looks set to begin in earnest early next year, but its lofty proposal to establish at least eight new public television channels could take a little longer. At present, Taiwan's sole public television channel, Public Television Service (PTS,
If all goes according to plan, it is hoped that by late next year the newly established public television networks will include an open university channel, an Aboriginal channel, a macro-digital channel for overseas Chinese and a children's channel. According to Ching Swen (
"Public television is different from other networks, as it has to cater to many different groups -- Aborigines, the handicapped, children. There has to be something for everybody, which is difficult with only one channel," she said. "As a ban on commercials during prime-time viewing hours hasn't been ruled out, I don't think there will be any problems financing the new channels."
These new channels will reportedly cost the government somewhere in the region of NT$4 billion to create and operate. This hefty sum of money has left some believing that instead of creating a series of channels, the government should concentrate on nationalizing CTS and allow TTV and CTV to remain commercial.
"It would be easy to nationalize CTS, as the government owns a majority stake in the company, but I don't think such a scheme would work with TTV and it's still not clear what [the government's] intentions are towards CTV. It will certainly cost far too much money to change them all to public television channels," said Lu.
"I think it would make much better sense to concentrate on creating one new public television channel and divide programming to cater to the different groups," he said.
Although the final revisions are yet to be put before the Legislative Yuan, the GIO is hopeful that work on deconstructing years of politically owned broadcast media can begin in earnest in mid-2005, when it tenders out to the public domain the channels once owned by the BCC.
Whether the government's lofty scheme pays off or not, the president of Voice of Taiwan, which has been broadcasting as a pirate radio station since its inception in 1993, has no intention of applying for a license to broadcast legally. Nor does he believe that any move by the government to de-politicize the broadcast media will work.
"I won't be applying for a license. I don't see the point," he said. "They talk about giving the media back to the people, but I think there'll always be an element of political control and even bribery somewhere along the line in Taiwan, regardless of good intentions or whatever party is in power."
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s